ETERNITY HAS ALREADY BEGUN - Islamic Books, Islamic Movies ...

ETERNITY HAS ALREADY BEGUN - Islamic Books, Islamic Movies ... ETERNITY HAS ALREADY BEGUN - Islamic Books, Islamic Movies ...

islamicblessings.com
from islamicblessings.com More from this publisher
26.03.2013 Views

38 Who Is the Perceiver? ETERNITY HAS ALREADY BEGUN The brain is a collection of cells made up of protein and fat molecules. It is formed of nerve cells called neurons (above right). It is certainly not neurons that constitute consciousness. When we examine the structure of neurons, we see atoms. (above left) Unquestionably, it is impossible for unconscious atoms to produce consciousness. There is no power in this piece of meat to observe images, to constitute consciousness, or to create the being we call "myself". We can never have direct experience of the "external world" that many people think they inhabit. Here, however, arises a question of primary importance: If we cannot reach the original of any physical object we know of, what about our brain itself? Since our brain is a part of the material world just like our arms, our legs, or any other object, we can never reach its original either. When the brain is dissected, nothing is found in it but lipid and protein molecules, which exist in other organs of the body as well. This means that within the tissue we call "our brain," there is nothing to observe and interpret the images, constitute consciousness, or to make the being we call "ourselves." In relation to the perception of images in the brain, perceptual scientist R.L. Gregory refers to a mistake people make: There is a temptation, which must be avoided, to say that the eyes produce pictures in the brain. A picture in the brain suggests the

Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar) need of some kind of internal eye to see it—but this would need a further eye to see its picture… and so on in an endless regress of eyes and pictures. This is absurd. 6 This problem puts materialists, who hold that nothing is real except matter, in a quandary: Who is behind the eye that sees? What perceives what it sees, and then reacts? Renowned cognitive neuroscientist Karl Pribram focused on this important question, relevant to the worlds of both science and philosophy, about who the perceiver is: Philosophers since the Greeks have speculated about the "ghost" in the machine, the "little man inside the little man" and so on. Where is the I—the entity that uses the brain? Who does the actual knowing? Or, as Saint Francis of Assisi once put it, "What we are looking for is what is looking." 7 The following question appears on the cover of the American science magazine New Scientist, which dealt with the fact that we experience the material universe only as it appears in our minds, in its 30 January 1999 issue: "Beyond Reality: Is the Universe Really a Frolic of Primal Information and Matter Just a Mirage?" This book in your hand, the room you are in—in brief, all the images before you—are perceived inside your brain. Is it the blind, deaf, unconscious component atoms that view these images? Why did some atoms acquire this quality, whereas most did not? Do our acts of thinking, comprehending, remembering, being delighted, and everything else consist of chemical reactions among these atoms' molecules? There is no sense in looking for will in atoms. Clearly, the being who sees, hears, and feels is a supra-material being, "alive," who is neither matter nor an image. This being interacts with the perceptions before it by using the image of our body. 39

38<br />

Who Is the Perceiver?<br />

<strong>ETERNITY</strong> <strong>HAS</strong> <strong>ALREADY</strong> <strong>BEGUN</strong><br />

The brain is a collection of cells made up of protein and fat molecules. It is<br />

formed of nerve cells called neurons (above right). It is certainly not neurons that<br />

constitute consciousness. When we examine the structure of neurons, we see<br />

atoms. (above left) Unquestionably, it is impossible for unconscious atoms to<br />

produce consciousness. There is no power in this piece of meat to observe images,<br />

to constitute consciousness, or to create the being we call "myself".<br />

We can never have direct experience of the "external world" that<br />

many people think they inhabit. Here, however, arises a question of<br />

primary importance: If we cannot reach the original of any physical<br />

object we know of, what about our brain itself? Since our brain is a<br />

part of the material world just like our arms, our legs, or any other<br />

object, we can never reach its original either.<br />

When the brain is dissected, nothing is found in it but lipid and<br />

protein molecules, which exist in other organs of the body as well.<br />

This means that within the tissue we call "our brain," there is nothing<br />

to observe and interpret the images, constitute consciousness, or<br />

to make the being we call "ourselves."<br />

In relation to the perception of images in the brain, perceptual<br />

scientist R.L. Gregory refers to a mistake people make:<br />

There is a temptation, which must be avoided, to say that the eyes<br />

produce pictures in the brain. A picture in the brain suggests the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!