26.03.2013 Views

Spectral Unmixing Applied to Desert Soils for the - Naval ...

Spectral Unmixing Applied to Desert Soils for the - Naval ...

Spectral Unmixing Applied to Desert Soils for the - Naval ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

such an inference can be made (Ben-Dor et al., 2003; Davis, 2007; Prose, 1985). O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

imagery-derived endmembers corresponded <strong>to</strong> various types of vegetation, rivers, paved<br />

roads, and different mineral depositions. These endmembers were evaluated only on<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir ability <strong>to</strong> be identified within <strong>the</strong> imagery as a method of determining what spatial<br />

extent should be expected and as a comparison <strong>to</strong> where user supplied endmembers were<br />

detected <strong>to</strong> make sure <strong>the</strong>re was no crossover.<br />

Table 3. This table shows <strong>the</strong> depths <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> zunyite features in <strong>the</strong> order of<br />

decreasing feature depth at 500 nm. It is inconclusive how <strong>the</strong> pattern of<br />

feature depth change is associated with different levels of disturbance,<br />

though patterns of change with respect <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> reference endmember 28 can<br />

be seen. These are imagery derived endmembers so <strong>the</strong> level of disturbance<br />

is unknown. Without proper ground-truthing <strong>the</strong>re is no way <strong>to</strong> be sure if a<br />

relationship exists, however <strong>the</strong> similarity between <strong>the</strong>se patterns and those<br />

in <strong>the</strong> clay spectra suggests disturbance can be correlated with <strong>the</strong>se<br />

changes in depth as well.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!