26.03.2013 Views

building a STRONGER foundation - Cemex

building a STRONGER foundation - Cemex

building a STRONGER foundation - Cemex

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CEMEX, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES<br />

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)<br />

As of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008<br />

(Millions of Mexican pesos)<br />

As a result of ASU 2009-16, beginning January 1, 2010, CEMEX’s accounts receivable sold under its securitization program in Mexico no<br />

longer qualify for derecognition under U.S. GAAP considering that despite the effective surrender of control associated with the trade<br />

receivables sold and that CEMEX does not guarantee or is obliged to reacquire the assets. CEMEX participates on a stand-alone basis in a<br />

securitization program in Mexico and retains certain administrative roles in connection with the collection of the accounts receivable.<br />

Consequently, the condensed balance sheet financial information under U.S. GAAP as of December 31, 2010 includes the reversal of the<br />

receivables sold and derecognized under MFRS for approximately Ps3,617, which were recognized as part of current assets against current<br />

liabilities. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, CEMEX considers there are no material effects that would require<br />

reconciling adjustments in the reconciliation of net income (loss) to U.S. GAAP since the discount granted to the acquirers of the trade<br />

receivables is recorded as financial expense under MFRS (note 5).<br />

(o) Other Disclosures under U.S. GAAP<br />

Asset retirement obligations and other environmental costs<br />

ASC 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations (“ASC 410”), requires entities to record the fair value of an asset retirement<br />

obligation as a liability in the period in which a legal or a constructive obligation is incurred associated with the retirement of tangible<br />

long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development, and/or normal use of the assets. Such liability would be<br />

recorded against an asset that is depreciated over the life of the long-lived asset. Subsequent to the initial measurement, the obligation will be<br />

adjusted at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time and changes in the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation.<br />

MFRS C-9, Liabilities, Provisions, Contingent Assets and Liabilities and Commitments ("MFRS C-9"), establishes generally the same<br />

requirements as ASC 410 in connection with asset retirement obligations. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, CEMEX<br />

did not identify any differences between MFRS and U.S. GAAP in connection with this topic.<br />

In addition, environmental expenditures related to current operations are expensed or capitalized, as appropriate. Other than those<br />

contingencies disclosed in notes 13 and 20, CEMEX is not currently facing other material contingencies, which might result in the<br />

recognition of an environmental remediation liability.<br />

Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities<br />

CEMEX accrues the costs related to an exit or disposal activity, including severance payments, according to ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost<br />

Obligations (“ASC 420”), which basically requires, as a condition to accrue for such costs, that the entity communicate the plan to all affected<br />

employees and that the plan be terminated in the short-term; otherwise, associated costs should be expensed when incurred.<br />

Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees<br />

Under U.S. GAAP, a guarantor is required to recognize, at origination of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation<br />

undertaken. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, CEMEX has not guaranteed any third parties' obligations. Nonetheless, with respect to the<br />

electricity supply long-term contract in Mexico discussed in note 19C, CEMEX may also be required to purchase the power plant upon the<br />

occurrence of specified material defaults or events, such as failure to purchase the energy and pay when due, bankruptcy or insolvency, and<br />

revocation of permits necessary to operate the facility. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, for accounting purposes<br />

under MFRS and U.S. GAAP, CEMEX has considered this agreement as a long-term energy supply agreement for own use and no liability<br />

has been created, based on the contingent characteristics of CEMEX's obligation and given that, absent a default under the agreement,<br />

CEMEX's obligations are limited to the purchase of energy from, and the supply of fuel to, the plant.<br />

Variable Interest Entities<br />

The FASB issued ASU 2009-17, Consolidations (Topic 810): Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable<br />

Interest Entities (FASB Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)) (“ASU 2009-17”) in December 2009. ASU 2009-<br />

17, which amends the Variable Interest Entity (VIE) Subsections of ASC Subtopic 810 10, Consolidation – Overall, revises the test for<br />

determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE from a primarily quantitative risks and rewards calculation based on the VIE’s expected losses<br />

and expected residual returns to a primarily qualitative analysis based on identifying the party or related party group (if any) with (a) the<br />

power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of, or the<br />

right to receive benefits from, the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. ASU 2009-17 requires kick out rights and participating<br />

rights to be ignored in evaluating whether a variable interest holder meets the power criterion unless those rights are unilaterally exercisable<br />

by a single party or related party group. ASU 2009-17 also revises the criteria for determining whether fees paid by an entity to a decision<br />

maker or another service provider are a variable interest in the entity and revises the Topic 810 scope characteristic that identifies an entity as<br />

a VIE if the equity at risk investors as a group do not have the right to control the entity through their equity interests to address the impact of<br />

kick out rights and participating rights on the analysis. Finally, ASU 2009-17 adds a new requirement to reconsider whether an entity is a VIE<br />

if the holders of the equity investment at risk as a group lose the power, through the rights of those interests, to direct the activities that most<br />

significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and requires a company to reassess on an ongoing basis whether it is deemed to be the<br />

primary beneficiary of a VIE. ASU 2009-17 is effective for CEMEX beginning January 1, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2009-17 did not have<br />

a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.<br />

F-78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!