building a STRONGER foundation - Cemex
building a STRONGER foundation - Cemex
building a STRONGER foundation - Cemex
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CEMEX, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES<br />
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)<br />
As of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008<br />
(Millions of Mexican pesos)<br />
24. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEXICAN AND UNITED STATES ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES<br />
(a) Basis of Presentation under U.S. GAAP<br />
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with MFRS, which differ in certain significant respects from generally accepted<br />
accounting principles applicable in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). The term “SFAS” as used herein refers to U.S. Statements of Financial<br />
Accounting Standards. Likewise, the term “FASB” refers to the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board. On July 1, 2009, the FASB instituted a<br />
major change in the way accounting standards are organized by the implementation of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM (“ASC”)<br />
which became the single official source of authoritative, nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. After that date, only one level of authoritative U.S. GAAP<br />
exists, other than guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). All other literature will be non-authoritative.<br />
As detailed in note 2A, until December 31, 2007, the MFRS consolidated financial statements included the effects of inflation, whereas financial<br />
statements prepared under U.S. GAAP are presented on a historical cost basis. The reconciliation to U.S. GAAP includes: (i) a reconciling item to<br />
reflect the difference in the carrying value of machinery and equipment of foreign origin and related depreciation between the methodology set forth by<br />
MFRS B-10 until December 31, 2007 and the amounts that would be determined by using the historical cost/constant currency method. As described<br />
below, this provision of inflation accounting under MFRS did not meet the requirements of Rule 3-20 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the SEC. The<br />
reconciliation does not include the reversal of other MFRS inflation accounting adjustments as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and<br />
2008, as these adjustments represent a comprehensive measure of the effects of price level changes in the applicable countries and, as such, are<br />
considered a more meaningful presentation than historical cost-based financial reporting for both Mexican and U.S. accounting purposes.<br />
Reconciliation of net income (loss) under MFRS to U.S. GAAP<br />
Considering the presentation of CEMEX’s operations in Australia in 2009 and 2008 as discontinued operations under MFRS (note 3B), for<br />
purposes of the reconciliation of net income (loss) to U.S. GAAP, all reconciling items pertaining to CEMEX’s operations in Australia for the<br />
those periods were reclassified and presented in the single line item “U.S. GAAP adjustments from discontinued operations.” For the years<br />
ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the main differences between MFRS and U.S. GAAP, and their effect on consolidated net income<br />
(loss) and earnings (loss) per share, are presented below:<br />
2010 2009 2008<br />
Income (loss) under MFRS from continuing operations .............................................. Ps (16,489) 5,925 226<br />
U.S. GAAP adjustments having the effect of increasing reported income (loss)<br />
from continuing operations:<br />
1. Financial instruments – Fair value measurements (note 24(h)).................................... – – 1,305<br />
2. Employees' statutory profit sharing (note 24(c)) .......................................................... – – 195<br />
3. Employee benefits (note 24(e)) .................................................................................... 36 104 104<br />
4. Other adjustments – Deferred charges (notes 24(c), (h) and (k)) ................................. 1,594 – 225<br />
5. Other adjustments – Discontinued operations financial expense (note 24(l)) .............. – 373 388<br />
6. Impairment of long-lived assets (note 24(j)) ................................................................ – 920 –<br />
7. Hedge accounting (note 24(h))..................................................................................... 1,449 1,763 –<br />
8. Income taxes (note 24(c)) ............................................................................................ 2,911 3,420 –<br />
9. Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes (note 24(d))............................................. 5,279 – –<br />
10. Financing transactions (note 24(f)) .............................................................................. 5,401 – –<br />
U.S. GAAP adjustments having the effect of decreasing reported income (loss)<br />
from continuing operations:<br />
1. Impairment of long-lived assets (note 24(j)) ................................................................ – – (46,077)<br />
2. Income taxes (note 24(c))............................................................................................. (5,442) – (7,861)<br />
3. Hedge accounting (note 24(h))..................................................................................... – – (7,716)<br />
4. Financing transactions (note 24(f)) .............................................................................. (1,627) (2,706) (2,596)<br />
5. Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes (note 24(d))............................................. – (3,473) (1,584)<br />
6. Financial instruments – Fair value measurements (note 24(h)).................................... (42) (1,057) –<br />
7. Financial instruments – Mandatorily convertible securities (note 24(h)) ..................... – (65) –<br />
8. Inflation adjustment of machinery and equipment (note 24(g)) ................................... (213) (224) (272)<br />
9. Other adjustments – Deferred charges (notes 24(c) and (k))........................................ – (6,104) –<br />
Loss under U.S. GAAP from continuing operations .............................................. Ps (7,143) (1,124) (63,663)<br />
Income (loss) from discontinued operations as reported under MFRS......................... – (4,276) 2,097<br />
U.S. GAAP adjustments from discontinued operations (note 24(l)) ............................ – (264) (275)<br />
Income (loss) under U.S. GAAP from discontinued operations ............................. Ps – (4,540) 1,822<br />
Non-controlling interest under MFRS.......................................................................... 27 240 45<br />
Non-controlling interest share of U.S. GAAP adjustment............................................ – – –<br />
Non-controlling income under U.S. GAAP ............................................................. Ps 27 240 45<br />
Controlling net loss under U.S. GAAP ..................................................................... Ps (7,170) (5,904) (61,886)<br />
F-62