Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Additional <strong>Trade</strong> Challenges: Transport, Transit, and Non-Tariff Barriers<br />
Administering the positive list created several unnecessary hassles for<br />
traders in both countries. The classification codes provided by <strong>Pakistan</strong><br />
for the positive list did not match with the <strong>India</strong>n classifications. Due to<br />
the mismatch in classification, customs officials very often classified items<br />
under the positive list at their own discretion. Additionally, in some cases<br />
the descriptions of items provided in the positive list did not match with<br />
the <strong>India</strong>n classifications, and for some of these a corresponding description<br />
did not even exist. Frequent changes in the positive list created uncertainty<br />
for traders. Permitting imports of certain items from <strong>India</strong> for only<br />
limited periods further created ambiguities in the trading environment<br />
(Taneja 2007). The positive list approach lacked transparency, created uncertainties<br />
for traders, and led to high transaction costs.<br />
Perhaps a major problem associated with the positive list is that a<br />
separate list has been maintained for the road route between the two<br />
countries at the Wagah border crossing. Along this trade route, only 14<br />
of the 1,934 items on the overall positive list are allowed to be traded.<br />
In accordance with the sequencing and timelines for the move toward<br />
full normalization of trade laid down by the two countries in the joint statement<br />
of November 2011, <strong>Pakistan</strong> made a transition from the positive list<br />
approach to a small negative list of 1,209 banned items. In the next stage<br />
(and as of this writing), the negative list was to be phased out by the end of<br />
2012. Until the negative list is abandoned completely, the positive list will<br />
continue to be in operation, though in a much more reduced form.<br />
The ChallenGes of TransPorT and TransiT<br />
The movement of goods between and through the two countries has long<br />
been undercut by inadequate logistical support required for trade. The<br />
road route was closed for several years; rail and air links have been cut<br />
off several times; and the sea trade has operated under a very restrictive<br />
agreement. These impediments have led to high transaction costs of trading.<br />
Since 2005, several measures have been undertaken to improve infrastructure<br />
and to remove restrictions on the movement of goods by road,<br />
rail, sea and air. These policies are likely to bring about a reduction in the<br />
costs of trading. However, for further reductions in these costs, several<br />
new steps need to be taken to achieve the goal of seamless transportation<br />
| 83 |