You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Perspectives from <strong>India</strong><br />
<strong>Pakistan</strong>. The losers would really be the Japanese or other exporters. But<br />
it is very important to be clear about that.<br />
The second thing that I learned, from the Sri Lankan businessman,<br />
was that the FTA allowed him and his business peers to have a certain<br />
amount of economies of scale so they could test their products outside<br />
Sri Lanka. Consider, for instance, their expansion into South <strong>India</strong>, particularly<br />
Tamil Nadu, with tea. Twenty years ago, you would never have<br />
thought of having Sri Lankan tea in <strong>India</strong>, because we were one of the<br />
biggest exporters and producers of tea. Now you do see that. Sri Lankan<br />
tea growers have now moved into the neighboring <strong>India</strong>n state of Tamil<br />
Nadu, and established their brand names. So the economies of scale afforded<br />
by an FTA really do offer an opportunity for a smaller country to<br />
test its markets, and develop a little bit of skill, which then allows it to go<br />
out and compete in a totally different market.<br />
So these are two things, I would submit, that <strong>Pakistan</strong>is have to be<br />
aware of, and see how they can use. In the case of Sri Lanka, they also<br />
used the opening to increase tourism from <strong>India</strong>, and this could also<br />
conceivably apply to <strong>Pakistan</strong>. The point is not that tourism per se is<br />
likely to be important in the <strong>India</strong>-<strong>Pakistan</strong> context, but that business<br />
has to be alert and open to all kinds of new opportunities that might<br />
arise, and be ready to grab them. You have to have a positive attitude.<br />
My final point relates to new initiatives. Let me put it in two different<br />
ways. In thinking of any next steps beyond MFN, it will be<br />
useful to re-energize SAFTA (the South Asian Free <strong>Trade</strong> Agreement).<br />
For a long time SAFTA was handicapped by a fundamental constraint,<br />
the asymmetry in MFN status between <strong>Pakistan</strong> and <strong>India</strong>, because<br />
of Islamabad’s refusal to grant MFN to <strong>India</strong>. Once this asymmetry<br />
is removed through effective MFN status for <strong>India</strong> in <strong>Pakistan</strong>, the<br />
foundation will be set for SAFTA to progress with greater speed and<br />
effectiveness. One might anticipate substantial gains from that. And<br />
this would also provide political cover to those who are in favor of<br />
free trade versus those who are opposed in principle to this concept.<br />
SAFTA in a way provides the cover for doing this. As Professor Nabi<br />
(among others) argues elsewhere in this volume, fully implementing<br />
SAFTA could convert South Asia into a true crossroads.<br />
Looking even farther afield, South Asia is a potential crossroads not<br />
only to Central Asia, but also to Southeast Asia. This is a particularly<br />
| 57 |