26.03.2013 Views

Pakistan-India Trade:

Pakistan-India Trade:

Pakistan-India Trade:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Arvind Virmani<br />

would have to go out of production. He came every year for five years,<br />

and then suddenly stopped coming. So I started wondering whether his<br />

business had disappeared. Well, some years later I read in the newspapers<br />

that dead-burned magnesia is still being produced in <strong>India</strong> and the business<br />

continues to thrive.<br />

The moral of that story is that it turns out that all those who thought<br />

that a reduction in QRs and tariffs would wipe out <strong>India</strong>n industry were<br />

wrong. People like me who were pushing for liberalization inside the<br />

government were right. We expected industry to adapt, adjust, and survive—and<br />

it did, contrary to the fears of 99 percent of the elites, academics,<br />

and economists and other people in <strong>India</strong> who thought <strong>India</strong>n<br />

industry would die. Eventually <strong>India</strong>n industry realized that it could not<br />

only compete with the best but also thrive. So that is one of the main<br />

reasons why <strong>India</strong>n industry today is not apprehensive about the prospect<br />

of expanding trade with <strong>Pakistan</strong>.<br />

The second reason for the attitude of <strong>India</strong>n industry is that in the<br />

states bordering <strong>Pakistan</strong>—for example, Punjab—there is a kind of<br />

historical memory (at least among older people) about the 1950s and<br />

early 1960s. Before 1965 and the outbreak of war between <strong>India</strong> and<br />

<strong>Pakistan</strong> that year, there was normal cross-border trade and economic<br />

relations for mutual benefit. There was no border before 1947, and<br />

so the issue of local—what one might call local and provincial comparative<br />

advantage—was experienced by people on both sides of the<br />

current border. Those of us who think of national issues often tend to<br />

forget that local economies also exist. There is local interaction, and<br />

there are still people in the <strong>India</strong>n Punjab at least and hopefully in<br />

<strong>Pakistan</strong>i Punjab who remember these earlier interactions. One way<br />

to put this more starkly is that even though Punjab is the agricultural<br />

heartland of <strong>India</strong>, the state also is home to small industry, which has<br />

been competing with large industry for decades. So again, there is this<br />

feeling that yes, there will be adjustments, but if you are not complacent,<br />

you can find your comparative advantage.<br />

So that is my perception of why <strong>India</strong>n business, by and large, is not<br />

apprehensive about trade and greater economic interaction with <strong>Pakistan</strong>.<br />

The second point I want to touch on briefly relates to the global<br />

experience. There is now convincing research from Latin America and<br />

other places about the effect of growth poles that shows that a high<br />

| 54 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!