Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Michael Kugelman<br />
its positive list of 2,000 goods that could be imported from <strong>India</strong>, and<br />
replaced it with a negative list of about 1,200 items that could not be<br />
imported (more than 500 of these untradeable items belonged to the<br />
automobile, iron, and steel sectors). Islamabad pledged to eliminate this<br />
negative list entirely by the end of 2012, thereby bringing the two countries<br />
closer to a fully operational MFN regime.<br />
In April, the two capitals launched a new integrated checkpoint at<br />
the Attari-Wagah land border crossing, generating promises from both<br />
countries that trade through this sector would increase tenfold. On the<br />
same day, <strong>India</strong> announced that it would permit foreign direct investment<br />
(FDI) from <strong>Pakistan</strong>. Over the summer, New Delhi removed a ban<br />
on <strong>Pakistan</strong>i businesses setting up operations inside <strong>India</strong>. In September,<br />
the two sides concluded a landmark visa agreement that loosens travel<br />
restrictions. Later in the year, Islamabad announced new measures to<br />
boost capacity on its side of the Attari-Wagah border, including the installation<br />
of additional scanners and weighbridges, and the deployment<br />
of more customs officials to the site.<br />
Many observers believe increased trade will benefit each country’s<br />
economy, but also build constituencies for more cooperative bilateral<br />
relations—in effect opening the door to progress on core political and<br />
security issues.<br />
This is certainly an argument endorsed by Islamabad. Several<br />
months after <strong>Pakistan</strong>’s MFN announcement, <strong>Pakistan</strong>i Foreign<br />
Minister Hina Rabbani Khar stated in a speech at the Lahore<br />
University of Management Sciences (LUMS) that more trade with<br />
<strong>India</strong> would enhance <strong>Pakistan</strong>’s prospects for peace and prosperity,<br />
and “put in place the conditions that will enable <strong>Pakistan</strong> to better<br />
pursue its principled positions” on territorial issues. 3<br />
In 2012, recognizing the significance of trade in the <strong>Pakistan</strong>-<strong>India</strong><br />
relationship, the Asia Program of the Washington, DC-based Woodrow<br />
Wilson Center, with co-sponsorship from the Wilson Center’s Program<br />
on America and the Global Economy, and with generous support from<br />
the Karachi-based Fellowship Fund for <strong>Pakistan</strong>, hosted a conference on<br />
<strong>Pakistan</strong>-<strong>India</strong> trade. The contributions in this volume were originally<br />
presented at this conference.<br />
| 2 |