26.03.2013 Views

Pakistan-India Trade:

Pakistan-India Trade:

Pakistan-India Trade:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Kalpana Kochhar and Ejaz Ghani<br />

trade liberalization via the granting of MFN status to generate the greatest<br />

gains for <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong>, it is critical that there are accompanying<br />

reforms of trade facilitation and connectivity. <strong>Trade</strong> facilitation reforms<br />

will lead to the reduction of behind-the-border barriers, and decrease<br />

the cost of trading across borders. These reforms could include improvements<br />

in infrastructure, institutions, services, procedures, and regulatory<br />

systems. The results of general equilibrium simulations (described in detail<br />

later on) suggest that <strong>Pakistan</strong>’s granting of MFN status to <strong>India</strong> will<br />

generate larger trade benefits only if it is supported by improved trade<br />

facilitation and connectivity. In other words, the net economic impact of<br />

improved trade facilitation would be larger for both <strong>Pakistan</strong> and <strong>India</strong>,<br />

and eventually would lead to stronger economic growth for the region.<br />

What is remarkable about South Asia is that it is the second fastest<br />

growing region in the world, but it is also the least integrated region. The<br />

region has integrated with the world, but not with its neighbors. This<br />

low level of integration has implications for prosperity and the pace of<br />

poverty reduction in South Asia. Two of the poorest South Asian countries,<br />

Afghanistan and Nepal, are land-locked. Several lagging regions<br />

of the larger South Asian countries of Bangladesh, <strong>India</strong>, and <strong>Pakistan</strong><br />

are located in border areas. Out of the 14 states in <strong>India</strong> that have borders<br />

with neighboring countries, 12 have per capita income levels at<br />

or below the national average (Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya,<br />

Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura, Manipur, West Bengal, Bihar, Uttar<br />

Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, and Rajasthan). In <strong>Pakistan</strong>, per capita<br />

income is lower than average in the border provinces of Khyber<br />

Pakhtunkhwa, Baluchistan, and rural Sindh. In Bangladesh, the border<br />

districts tend to have per capita incomes lower than the national average.<br />

Typically, these sub-regions have poor connectivity with markets<br />

in neighboring countries. This in part explains why the poverty mass in<br />

South Asia is concentrated in the lagging regions, many in the border<br />

regions, while economic mass is concentrated in the leading regions.<br />

South Asia’s coming demographic transition, and the fact that traditional<br />

advanced country partners may have entered a prolonged slowdown,<br />

provide new momentum for local and regional integration.<br />

Improved peace and stability, the demographic transition, and better<br />

trade facilitation will make domestic markets even larger. Increased regional<br />

trade could be the catalyst that attracts global production centers to<br />

| 98 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!