Pakistan-India Trade:
Pakistan-India Trade: Pakistan-India Trade:
What Can India and Pakistan Do To Maximize the Benefits from Trade? KALPANA KOCHHAR AND EJAZ GHANI India and Pakistan, South Asia’s two largest countries (they have a total population of 1.4 billion people), share a common border, culture, and history. Yet despite their proximity, the two countries barely trade with each other. India’s trade with Pakistan accounted for less than half a percentage point of India’s total trade in 2010, and Pakistan’s trade with India was less than 5 percent of its total trade. This is about to change. In 2011, Pakistan decided to grant Most Favored Nation (MFN) status to India, reciprocating India’s granting of MFN status to Pakistan in 1996. India now plans to liberalize visa and investment regimes to boost trade and business-to-business contacts. By extending MFN status to India, Pakistan will replace a positive list with a negative list of goods and services to be traded with India (that is, it will switch from a list of goods and services that can be traded to a shorter list of goods that cannot be traded). As of this writing, the negative lists of both countries were to be eliminated by December 2012. After the transition to MFN is completed, the plan is that sensitive lists will be further liberalized. 1 Both India and Pakistan will gradually phase out all tariffs on traded goods, with an expectation of zero tariffs by 2016, as required by a fully implemented South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA). What will be the gains from trade for India and Pakistan? Which industries are likely to benefit? How important is it for the liberalization of trade policy to be accompanied by other reforms to improve infrastructure, connectivity, and logistics? Our ongoing research shows that for Kalpana Kochhar is chief economist for the South Asia Region (SAR) of the World Bank. ejaz Ghani is an economic adviser for SAR. | 97 |
Kalpana Kochhar and Ejaz Ghani trade liberalization via the granting of MFN status to generate the greatest gains for India and Pakistan, it is critical that there are accompanying reforms of trade facilitation and connectivity. Trade facilitation reforms will lead to the reduction of behind-the-border barriers, and decrease the cost of trading across borders. These reforms could include improvements in infrastructure, institutions, services, procedures, and regulatory systems. The results of general equilibrium simulations (described in detail later on) suggest that Pakistan’s granting of MFN status to India will generate larger trade benefits only if it is supported by improved trade facilitation and connectivity. In other words, the net economic impact of improved trade facilitation would be larger for both Pakistan and India, and eventually would lead to stronger economic growth for the region. What is remarkable about South Asia is that it is the second fastest growing region in the world, but it is also the least integrated region. The region has integrated with the world, but not with its neighbors. This low level of integration has implications for prosperity and the pace of poverty reduction in South Asia. Two of the poorest South Asian countries, Afghanistan and Nepal, are land-locked. Several lagging regions of the larger South Asian countries of Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan are located in border areas. Out of the 14 states in India that have borders with neighboring countries, 12 have per capita income levels at or below the national average (Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura, Manipur, West Bengal, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, and Rajasthan). In Pakistan, per capita income is lower than average in the border provinces of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Baluchistan, and rural Sindh. In Bangladesh, the border districts tend to have per capita incomes lower than the national average. Typically, these sub-regions have poor connectivity with markets in neighboring countries. This in part explains why the poverty mass in South Asia is concentrated in the lagging regions, many in the border regions, while economic mass is concentrated in the leading regions. South Asia’s coming demographic transition, and the fact that traditional advanced country partners may have entered a prolonged slowdown, provide new momentum for local and regional integration. Improved peace and stability, the demographic transition, and better trade facilitation will make domestic markets even larger. Increased regional trade could be the catalyst that attracts global production centers to | 98 |
- Page 56 and 57: BoX 2: The new (old) road to Kashmi
- Page 58 and 59: Pakistan’s Trade with India: Thin
- Page 60 and 61: Pakistan’s Trade with India: Thin
- Page 62 and 63: Perspectives from India | 53 | ARVI
- Page 64 and 65: Perspectives from India growth econ
- Page 66 and 67: Perspectives from India Pakistan. T
- Page 68 and 69: Managing India-Pakistan Trade Relat
- Page 70 and 71: Managing India-Pakistan Trade Relat
- Page 72 and 73: Managing India-Pakistan Trade Relat
- Page 74 and 75: Managing India-Pakistan Trade Relat
- Page 76 and 77: Managing India-Pakistan Trade Relat
- Page 78 and 79: Managing India-Pakistan Trade Relat
- Page 80 and 81: Managing India-Pakistan Trade Relat
- Page 82 and 83: Managing India-Pakistan Trade Relat
- Page 84 and 85: Additional Trade Challenges: Transp
- Page 86 and 87: Additional Trade Challenges: Transp
- Page 88 and 89: Additional Trade Challenges: Transp
- Page 90 and 91: Product Code Additional Trade Chall
- Page 92 and 93: Additional Trade Challenges: Transp
- Page 94 and 95: Additional Trade Challenges: Transp
- Page 96 and 97: Additional Trade Challenges: Transp
- Page 98 and 99: Additional Trade Challenges: Transp
- Page 100 and 101: Additional Trade Challenges: Transp
- Page 102 and 103: Additional Trade Challenges: Transp
- Page 104 and 105: Additional Trade Challenges: Transp
- Page 108 and 109: What Can India and Pakistan Do To M
- Page 110 and 111: What Can India and Pakistan Do To M
- Page 112 and 113: What Can India and Pakistan Do To M
- Page 114 and 115: What Can India and Pakistan Do To M
- Page 116 and 117: What Can India and Pakistan Do To M
- Page 118 and 119: What Can India and Pakistan Do To M
- Page 120 and 121: What Can India and Pakistan Do To M
- Page 122 and 123: What Can India and Pakistan Do To M
- Page 124 and 125: What Can India and Pakistan Do To M
- Page 126 and 127: Non-Trade-Related Stakes of the Pak
- Page 128 and 129: Non-Trade-Related Stakes of the Pak
- Page 130 and 131: Non-Trade-Related Stakes of the Pak
- Page 132 and 133: Non-Trade-Related Stakes of the Pak
- Page 134 and 135: Non-Trade-Related Stakes of the Pak
- Page 136 and 137: Non-Trade-Related Stakes of the Pak
- Page 138 and 139: Recent Asia Program Publications Pa
- Page 140 and 141: Recent Asia Program Publications Ch
- Page 142 and 143: Recent Asia Program Publications Th
- Page 144 and 145: Woodrow Wilson Center Pakistan Scho
What Can <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong> Do<br />
To Maximize the Benefits from <strong>Trade</strong>?<br />
KALPANA KOCHHAR AND EJAZ GHANI<br />
<strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong>, South Asia’s two largest countries (they have a total<br />
population of 1.4 billion people), share a common border, culture,<br />
and history. Yet despite their proximity, the two countries barely<br />
trade with each other. <strong>India</strong>’s trade with <strong>Pakistan</strong> accounted for less than<br />
half a percentage point of <strong>India</strong>’s total trade in 2010, and <strong>Pakistan</strong>’s trade<br />
with <strong>India</strong> was less than 5 percent of its total trade.<br />
This is about to change. In 2011, <strong>Pakistan</strong> decided to grant Most<br />
Favored Nation (MFN) status to <strong>India</strong>, reciprocating <strong>India</strong>’s granting<br />
of MFN status to <strong>Pakistan</strong> in 1996. <strong>India</strong> now plans to liberalize<br />
visa and investment regimes to boost trade and business-to-business<br />
contacts. By extending MFN status to <strong>India</strong>, <strong>Pakistan</strong> will replace a<br />
positive list with a negative list of goods and services to be traded with<br />
<strong>India</strong> (that is, it will switch from a list of goods and services that can<br />
be traded to a shorter list of goods that cannot be traded). As of this<br />
writing, the negative lists of both countries were to be eliminated by<br />
December 2012. After the transition to MFN is completed, the plan is<br />
that sensitive lists will be further liberalized. 1 Both <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong><br />
will gradually phase out all tariffs on traded goods, with an expectation<br />
of zero tariffs by 2016, as required by a fully implemented South<br />
Asian Free <strong>Trade</strong> Area (SAFTA).<br />
What will be the gains from trade for <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong>? Which industries<br />
are likely to benefit? How important is it for the liberalization of<br />
trade policy to be accompanied by other reforms to improve infrastructure,<br />
connectivity, and logistics? Our ongoing research shows that for<br />
Kalpana Kochhar is chief economist for the South Asia Region (SAR) of the<br />
World Bank. ejaz Ghani is an economic adviser for SAR.<br />
| 97 |