You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Nisha Taneja<br />
removing restrictions on truck type, and permitting <strong>India</strong>n and <strong>Pakistan</strong>i<br />
trucks to move freely on each other’s territory so that there is no need for<br />
transhipment at the border. Similarly, permitting containerized rail cargo<br />
will facilitate trade immensely. These changes should be supplemented<br />
with the two countries granting transit rights to each other.<br />
Finally, <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong> are trying to address the non-tariff barriers<br />
faced by <strong>Pakistan</strong>i businesses in entering the <strong>India</strong>n market. Some<br />
of the measures that can be taken include improving infrastructure for<br />
testing facilities, simplifying procedures, and entering into equivalence<br />
agreements and mutual recognition agreements. However, very often<br />
non-tariff barriers are perceived to exist where they actually do not,<br />
due to a lack of information about each other’s regulatory regimes.<br />
Creating multilevel channels of communication can reduce misconceptions,<br />
bridge the information gap, and generate a significant change in<br />
the business environment of the two countries. These channels can be<br />
effective only if the visa regime is also liberalized.<br />
referenCes<br />
Taneja, Nisha. 2011. “Come Together, Right Now—Over <strong>Trade</strong>.” Foreign Policy (AfPak<br />
Channel), November 17. http://afpak.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/11/17/<br />
come_together_right_now_over_trade.<br />
----. .2007. “<strong>Trade</strong> Possibilities and Non-Tariff Barriers to Indo-Pak <strong>Trade</strong>.” Working<br />
Paper No. 200, <strong>India</strong>n Council for Research on International Economic Relations,<br />
New Delhi. http://www.icrier.org/pdf/Working%20Paper%20200.pdf.<br />
----. 2006. “<strong>India</strong> <strong>Pakistan</strong> <strong>Trade</strong>.” Working Paper No. 182, <strong>India</strong>n Council for Research on<br />
International Economic Relations, New Delhi. http://www.icrier.org/pdf/wp182.pdf.<br />
----. 2005. “Informal <strong>Trade</strong> in South Asia: How to Channelize to a Formal Route?”<br />
Briefing Paper No. 5, CUTS Center for International <strong>Trade</strong>, Economics &<br />
Environment, Jaipur (<strong>India</strong>). http://www.cuts-citee.org/pdf/BP05-REC-2.pdf.<br />
Taneja, Nisha and Pallavi Kalita. 2011. “Most Favored Nation: New <strong>Trade</strong> Opportunities<br />
for <strong>India</strong> and <strong>Pakistan</strong>.” Economic and Political Weekly 46 (49). http://www.epw.in/<br />
commentary/most-favoured-nation-new-trade-opportunities-india-and-pakistan.html.<br />
Taneja, Nisha, Shravani Prakash, and Pallavi Kalita. 2011. “Issues in <strong>India</strong>-<strong>Pakistan</strong> <strong>Trade</strong><br />
Negotiations.” Economic and Political Weekly 46 (30). http://www.epw.in/commentary/<br />
issues-india-pakistan-trade-negotiations.html.<br />
Taneja, Nisha, Rashmi Rastogi, and Sanjeet Rai. 2008. “Examining NTMs/PTMs by <strong>India</strong> in<br />
the Context of SAFTA.” Prepared for the Ministry of Commerce, government of <strong>India</strong>.<br />
| 96 |