chemical physics of discharges - Argonne National Laboratory

chemical physics of discharges - Argonne National Laboratory chemical physics of discharges - Argonne National Laboratory

26.03.2013 Views

396 ‘c erperature, while the present experimental data were obtained at opereti:i; conditions. Noreover, the experimental data were obtained from coals at four different stages of reaction: raw coal, pretreated coal, lw- t emperature gasification residue, and high- t emperature gasification residue. Ash balances were used to put these results on a common basis. The ash balance calculations gave the percent of carbon gasified in each cDal or char. Raw coal was asswed t3 have 0s carbon gasified. 7-L~s Figure 6 shows the general trend of the heat of reaction. Accurate heat-sf-reaction data are given in Table 1. Although the pilot plant data are considerably scattered, the average value is not tm different from that obtained by the other methods. The calorime- try data also show some scattering, which is due to the hetemgeneous nature of the mal, and the characteristics of the calorimeter and the sensiw instruments. Examinations of the temperature measurement, the pressure measurement, the temperature distribution in the calorimeter, the total mass balance, and the calibration results obtained from the cmstant-heat-input method and experimental runs on hydrogen and 2- aecane reactions indicate that the data reported in Table 2 should not ::zve T: deviation greater than 10%. This work is jointly sponsored by the American Gas Association and tile U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Coal Research. Their suppopt is gratefilly acknowledged. Valuable advice and discussions riere provided by Drs. B. S. Lee, S. A. Weil, and C. W. Solbrig of the Institute of Gas Technology. J. R. WSando assisted in the experimen- tal :.:3rl.;.

i Ij EPERENCES CITED 307 HJ7drOgen Mixtures at Eigh Temperatures and Pressures, " Ind. E~P. Chex Process Desim Develop. 4, 134-42 (.1965) April. Huebler, J. and Schora, F. C., "Coal Hydrogasification, Chem. Erg. Prom. 62 87-91. (1966) February.. ,' ' JANAF Thermochemical Tables. Distributed by: Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, Springfield, Va. KaVlACkr V. J. and Lee, B. S., "Coal Pretreatment in Fluidized Bed, he??. Chem. SOC. Div. Fuel Chem. Preprints 10, No. 4J 131-39 (1966 September. Lindentl H. R., "Pipeline Gas From Coal: Status and Future Prospects, Coal Ape 5, 64-71 (1966) January. Pyrcioch, E. J., Lee, B. S. and Schora, F. C., "Hydrogasification of Pretreated Coal for Pipeline Gas 'Production, It her. Chem. SOC. Div. Fuel Chem. Preprints 2, No. 4, 206-23 (1966) September. Pyrcioch, E. J. and Linden, H. R., ";ipeline Gas by High-Pressure Fluid-Bed Hydrogasification of Char, Ind. Erg . Chem. E,, 590-94 ( 196 0 ) July. Rossini, F. D. et al., Selected Values of Physical and Thermo- dynamic Properties of Hydrocarbons and Related Compounds. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press, 1953. Tajbl, D. G., Feldkirchner, H. L. and Lee,IIA. L., "Cleanup Methanation for Hydrogasification Process her. Chem. SOC. Div. Fuel Chem. Preprints l.0, No. 4, 235-45 (1966) September. Tsaros, C. L. and Feldkirchner, H. L., "Production of High Btu Gas, 'I Chem. -*62, 49-54 (1966) August. von Fredersdorff, lIC. G. and Vandaveer, F. E., "Substitute Natural Gas From Coal, in Segeler, C. G., Ed., Gas Wineers Handbook, Section 3, Chap. 9, 3/100-3/123. New York: The Industrial Fress, 1965. I

396<br />

‘c erperature, while the present experimental data were obtained at opereti:i;<br />

conditions. Noreover, the experimental data were obtained from<br />

coals at four different stages <strong>of</strong> reaction: raw coal, pretreated coal,<br />

lw- t emperature gasification residue, and high- t emperature gasification<br />

residue. Ash balances were used to put these results on a common basis.<br />

The ash balance calculations gave the percent <strong>of</strong> carbon gasified in<br />

each cDal or char. Raw coal was asswed t3 have 0s carbon gasified.<br />

7-L~s Figure 6 shows the general trend <strong>of</strong> the heat <strong>of</strong> reaction.<br />

Accurate heat-sf-reaction data are given in Table 1. Although the<br />

pilot plant data are considerably scattered, the average value is not<br />

tm different from that obtained by the other methods. The calorime-<br />

try data also show some scattering, which is due to the hetemgeneous<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> the mal, and the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the calorimeter and the<br />

sensiw instruments. Examinations <strong>of</strong> the temperature measurement, the<br />

pressure measurement, the temperature distribution in the calorimeter,<br />

the total mass balance, and the calibration results obtained from the<br />

cmstant-heat-input method and experimental runs on hydrogen and 2-<br />

aecane reactions indicate that the data reported in Table 2 should not<br />

::zve T: deviation greater than 10%.<br />

This work is jointly sponsored by the American Gas Association and<br />

tile U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior, Office <strong>of</strong> Coal Research. Their<br />

suppopt is gratefilly acknowledged. Valuable advice and discussions<br />

riere provided by Drs. B. S. Lee, S. A. Weil, and C. W. Solbrig <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Gas Technology. J. R. WSando assisted in the experimen-<br />

tal :.:3rl.;.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!