26.03.2013 Views

chemical physics of discharges - Argonne National Laboratory

chemical physics of discharges - Argonne National Laboratory

chemical physics of discharges - Argonne National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8<br />

enthalpy dependence are not what one would%xpect for mixing and subsequent freezing<br />

<strong>of</strong> a reaction in a confining tube and further for the shorter reactors the enthalpy<br />

at the exit is still very high. We shall therefore disregard this possibility here.<br />

(Note however, that Bronfln is currently testing this nodel by means <strong>of</strong> computer<br />

(13) B. R. Bronfln, personal cammunication.<br />

I<br />

i<br />

$<br />

I \<br />

simulation.) The expected way in which equilibrium could control the reaction is for<br />

the product distribution to be a function <strong>of</strong> the enthalpy and canposition pr<strong>of</strong>iles<br />

at the <strong>of</strong> the reactor where there is an onset <strong>of</strong> rapid quenching. The calcula- \<br />

tions indicate that composition is only <strong>of</strong> secondary importance in the "plateau"<br />

region so that presumably the enthalpy pr<strong>of</strong>lle would be controlling. This differs<br />

\<br />

from true titration in the important respect that in titration one in effect irre- (<br />

versably consumes a certain potential <strong>of</strong> the nitrogen Jet to form HCH that is clearly<br />

a function only <strong>of</strong> the temperature and/or composition and velocity pr<strong>of</strong>ile in the<br />

\<br />

nitrogen at the point <strong>of</strong> mixing but before mixing occurs. If we a~sumc the velocity \<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> a plasma jet is uniquely determined by the enthalpy pr<strong>of</strong>lle,(g) then the<br />

reacting potential as a consequence would in turn be uniquely related to the heat<br />

flow in the gas.<br />

1<br />

Despite this difference, there is no way to distinguish unambiguously between these<br />

two possibilities using but one reactor. This is because fractional heat loss from a<br />

plasma in a particular reactor type has been shown to be primarily a function <strong>of</strong><br />

reactor length and arc unit design,(14) so that the ratio <strong>of</strong> exit heat flow to inlet heat \<br />

(14) J. P. Skrivan and W. VonJaskowaky, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Design Develop. 4,<br />

371 (1965).<br />

flow is nearly constant. The primary objective <strong>of</strong> the work reported here vu there-<br />

fore to carefully distinguish between these possibilities by performing identical<br />

titration experiments in tvo or =re reactore that differ signiflcantly in length in<br />

order to determine unambiguously whether inlet or exit heat flaw controls the<br />

reaction.<br />

It had been inferred fran the earlier work by rather incomplete evidence that smhow<br />

the capacity to make HCN is primarily dependent on arc conditions no matter hav<br />

far removed the injection point is fran the arc unit itself. A further objective <strong>of</strong><br />

this experiment wat# therefore to systematically check this tentative conclusion by<br />

careful control and variation <strong>of</strong> the injection point on a losg nactor. Ran the<br />

standpoint <strong>of</strong> the titration hypothesis, if the arc unit conditions are indeed controlling,<br />

then a very long-lived reactive species is Implied; such a species is hardly to<br />

be expected under these experimental conditions.<br />

Finally, at the same time the older vork VY being done, Leutner(l5) using a very<br />

short tubular reactor <strong>of</strong> othervise the sam design found he vu able to work at<br />

(15) E. H. kutner, Ind. Eng. men. Procesm Design Develop., 2, 3 5 (1963).<br />

,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!