chemical physics of discharges - Argonne National Laboratory
chemical physics of discharges - Argonne National Laboratory chemical physics of discharges - Argonne National Laboratory
236 Results and Discussion When hydrogen sulfide is introduced into an argon plasma condensing elemental sulfur produces a dense fog dovnstream from the plasma flame. As the amount of nydrocarbon that is introduced into this region is increased the elemental sulfur production decreases to a point where it can no longer be observed. With large excesses of hydrocarbon the color of the plasma flame changes from blue to orange due to back diffusion of the hydrocarbon. Table 1 gives the reactant and product concentrations for reactions of dis- sociated liydrogen sulfide with methane and neopentane. With the exception of run number 3 the only gaseous products detected were hydrogen sulfide, unreacted hydro- carbon, carbon disulfide, and hydrogen. Table 1 Reactant and Product Analyses Reactant Mixture Products Composition Mole % Composition Mole % RUXI No. Reactants HC H2S hK HC H2S H2 CS2 C2H2 AK 1 H2S, CH4 6.4 17.6 76.5 2.2 4.5 18.5 3.8 0 70.1 2 I, 6.4 17.6 76.5 4.3 6.7 13.4 1.6 0 71.1 3 11 25.5 9.9 64.7 13.0 1.3 21.9 3.5 3.0 57.8 4 H2S, C5Hl2 15.3 14.9 70.2 11.0 0.7 18.1 3.9 0 69.7 5 11 15.3 14.9 70.2 13.4 4.8 12.9 2.8 0 70.0 The following stoichiometry would be expected for the reaction of methane: 2H2S + CH4 -+ CS2 + 4H2. (3) In run number 3 the acetylene was produced by the back diffusion of methane into the plasma region. The stoichiometry €or the neopentane reaction would be lOH2S + C5H12 -f 5cs2 + l6HzS. (4) The reactions of neopentane were performed with a large excess of hydrocarbon with the hope of detecting sulfur insertion compounds OK reaction intermediates. How- ever, hydrogen and carbon disulfide were the only gaseous species produced. This indicates that once the neopentane reacts with one sulfur atom its resistance to further reaction is lowered. Table 2 shows the variation of reactant decomposition with changes of hydrogen sulfide to hydrocarbon flow ratio and plasma-hydrocarbon injection distance. From Table 2 it can be seen that the extent of hydrogen sulfide decomposition is a function of the amount of hydrocarbon present downstream from the plasma flame and the distance from the flame that the hydrocarbon is introduced. the highest - decom- Position, 95 per cent, occurring in run number 4 with an approximately ten fold excess ’ Of neopentane introduced 1/4 inch from the flame. The figures for the decomposition ’ Of hydrogen sulfide tend to be misleading, the hydrocarbon addition does not change 1 the degree of dissociation of the hydrogen sulfide but rather it reacts with the atomic sulfur minimizing formation of hydrogen sulfide by the recombination of the I i
237 Table 2 Experimental Variables and Xeaction Conversion Efficiencies Flow HC inlet distance Conversion of decomposed Run - NO. Reactants rate (total) * c.f.h. HZS/HC from plasma inches Reactant reactants to: decomposition CS? H? - H2S HC H2S IHC &S + HC % % -%- x % 1 H2S, CH4 0.14 2.75 114 72 63 65 *lo0 %lo0 2 I, 0.14 2.75 1 59 28 33 1.100 %lo0 3 ,I 0.33 0.39 114 85 43 93 36 81 4 HzS, CgH12 0.25 1.03 1/4 95 28 55. 19 46 5 I, 0.25 1.03 1 68 12 56 30 61 * cu ft/hr. atomic hydrogen and sulfur. The data on extent of conversion to hydrogen and carbon disulfide in Table 2 show that in runs 1 and 2 essentially all of the carbon from the decomposed methane is converted into carbon disulfide and the hydrogen into molecular hydrogen. In run number 3 the acetylene produced accounts for the missing carbon and hydrogen. In runs number 4 and 5 a large fraction of the neopentane that was decomposed was converted into a solid product. Table 2 also shows the percentage of the sulfur, resulting from the decom- position of the hydrogen sulfide, that is converted into carbon disulfide; the remainder of the sulfur appears as elemental sulfur (runs 1-3) or can be incor- porated with the carbon-hydrogen polymeric solid that is produced in the runs us ing neopentane . These results indicate that hydrogen sulfide can be,completely dissociated by an electric discharge and the excited atomic hydrogen and sulfur generated can be reacted with hydrocarbons to produce molecular hydrogen and carbon disulfide. Under conditions which minimize back diffusion of the hydrocarbon into the electric discharge substantially complete conversion of the hydrogen sulfide and hydrocarbon to hydrogen and carbon disulfide can be effected. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. References Knight, A. R., Strausz, 0. P. and Gunning, H. E.,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85, 2349, (1963). Bryce, W. A. and Hinshelwood, C., J. Chem. Soc. 4, 3379, (1949). Nabor, G. W. and Smith, J. M., Ind. Eng. Chem. 45, 1272, (1953). Thacker, C. M. and Miller, E., Ind. Fng. Chem. 36, 182, (1944). Folkins, H. O., Miller, E. and Hennig, H., Ind. Eng. Chem. 2, 2201, (1950). Fisher, R. A. and Smith, J. M., Ind. Eng. Chem. 42, 704, (1950). Forney, R. C. and Smith, J. H., Ind. Eng. Chem. 43, 1841, (1951). Thomas, W. J. and Strickland-Constable, R. F., Trans. Farad. Soc. 53, 972, (1957) Vastola, F. J., Walker, P. L., Jr. and Wightman, J. T., Carbon 1, 11, (1963).
- Page 185 and 186: \ \' C 0 .d * d .- C U d 0) c( 1) L
- Page 187 and 188: I i I . Q) I, s w 0 v) Y 0 a w W a
- Page 189 and 190: I (b) Polarized Light Fig. 6 Cross
- Page 191 and 192: i m v) Y C i! u o) 23 a a- + 191 m
- Page 193 and 194: i, d C .d c c W Q ) 0 0 L1Y 0 000 0
- Page 195 and 196: i e 4 0 wcr -4 4 al 0 0 0 c) cr 13:
- Page 197 and 198: \ E ‘ 1 TIME FOR RUN 13-1 14-1 -
- Page 199 and 200: 199 a red heat in this cell using d
- Page 201 and 202: \ , t j \ I, v) 2 Y . C 0 u m .I C
- Page 203 and 204: 203 VAPOR PHASE FORMATION OF NONCRY
- Page 205 and 206: BELL JAR STANC TO VACUUM SYSTEM U T
- Page 207 and 208: 207 of the boron oxide film, the fi
- Page 209 and 210: i I, 4 I.( Y I- * 0 i f i 3 0.t I I
- Page 211 and 212: 211 The Reacticn 3f Oxygen with Car
- Page 213 and 214: 2 E, W t- a Z 9 I- a 2 X 0 I50 too
- Page 215 and 216: 'i' 100 50 IC 21 5 2.0 2.5 SURFACE
- Page 217 and 218: I- z W 0 w a a 100 80 60 40 20 215
- Page 219 and 220: s., Literature Cited Berkley, C. ,
- Page 221 and 222: 7 h \ F 221 600°C and 1 atmosphere
- Page 223 and 224: 223 e I'
- Page 225 and 226: R L ' -1 9mm O.D. 5mm I.D. 45mm 0.D
- Page 227 and 228: Figure 5.- Paschen's law curves. 2-
- Page 229 and 230: \ '? I The water-free product gases
- Page 231 and 232: N I + 0" ON i I + 0 u / 0 0 I 0 cu
- Page 233 and 234: - 233 SOME PROBLEMS OF THE KINETICS
- Page 235: .. . :. ,. .I , . i ? .. . , ... .
- Page 239 and 240: 239 Zhbie I Eerccnt Consumption of
- Page 241 and 242: 241 Discussion The systematic varia
- Page 243 and 244: I \ 1 243 FORMATION OF HYDROCARBONS
- Page 245 and 246: h z - a o m a 20 T IME, minutes . F
- Page 247 and 248: I 1 I I I I 0 I 2 3 4 5 TIME, minut
- Page 249 and 250: The next five coluws in table 1 sho
- Page 251 and 252: \ .\ t 251 Given the existence of t
- Page 253 and 254: I L 253 Epple, R. P. and C. M. Apt.
- Page 255 and 256: 1 ' Fig. 1 Schematic of flow discha
- Page 257 and 258: 5' . ' I 1 257 co, with excess H2,
- Page 259 and 260: 1 1 1 moo 1400 1300 c V' I IPOO I I
- Page 261 and 262: i 25i The Dlssocfatior of ToIuere V
- Page 263 and 264: L ! , c PRODUCTS FROM A 28 MC. DISC
- Page 265 and 266: '\ J ?. , .. . : PRODUCT FORMATION
- Page 267 and 268: '9 / I '\ "1 BENZYL CATION AND RADI
- Page 269 and 270: a
- Page 271 and 272: 271 tube serve? as the high voltare
- Page 273 and 274: 273 ion (1L.). Zxcitei-ion by colli
- Page 275 and 276: Apparatus and Procedure 275 EXPERIM
- Page 277 and 278: . 277 6. A freshly prepared sam le
- Page 279 and 280: observed. The polystyrene (10% solu
- Page 281 and 282: i i (12) c (11) (14) I 281 LITERATU
- Page 283 and 284: FLOW- METER I ADDITIVE SUPPLY * ,28
- Page 285 and 286: 285 TABLE 2 Effect of Haloqenated A
237<br />
Table 2<br />
Experimental Variables and Xeaction Conversion Efficiencies<br />
Flow<br />
HC inlet<br />
distance Conversion <strong>of</strong> decomposed<br />
Run<br />
- NO. Reactants<br />
rate<br />
(total)<br />
*<br />
c.f.h.<br />
HZS/HC<br />
from<br />
plasma<br />
inches<br />
Reactant reactants to:<br />
decomposition CS?<br />
H? -<br />
H2S HC H2S IHC &S + HC<br />
% % -%- x %<br />
1 H2S, CH4 0.14 2.75 114 72 63 65 *lo0 %lo0<br />
2 I, 0.14 2.75 1 59 28 33 1.100 %lo0<br />
3 ,I 0.33 0.39 114 85 43 93 36 81<br />
4 HzS, CgH12 0.25 1.03 1/4 95 28 55. 19 46<br />
5 I, 0.25 1.03 1 68 12 56 30 61<br />
* cu ft/hr.<br />
atomic hydrogen and sulfur. The data on extent <strong>of</strong> conversion to hydrogen and<br />
carbon disulfide in Table 2 show that in runs 1 and 2 essentially all <strong>of</strong> the<br />
carbon from the decomposed methane is converted into carbon disulfide and the<br />
hydrogen into molecular hydrogen. In run number 3 the acetylene produced accounts<br />
for the missing carbon and hydrogen. In runs number 4 and 5 a large fraction <strong>of</strong><br />
the neopentane that was decomposed was converted into a solid product.<br />
Table 2 also shows the percentage <strong>of</strong> the sulfur, resulting from the decom-<br />
position <strong>of</strong> the hydrogen sulfide, that is converted into carbon disulfide; the<br />
remainder <strong>of</strong> the sulfur appears as elemental sulfur (runs 1-3) or can be incor-<br />
porated with the carbon-hydrogen polymeric solid that is produced in the runs<br />
us ing neopentane .<br />
These results indicate that hydrogen sulfide can be,completely dissociated by<br />
an electric discharge and the excited atomic hydrogen and sulfur generated can be<br />
reacted with hydrocarbons to produce molecular hydrogen and carbon disulfide.<br />
Under conditions which minimize back diffusion <strong>of</strong> the hydrocarbon into the electric<br />
discharge substantially complete conversion <strong>of</strong> the hydrogen sulfide and hydrocarbon<br />
to hydrogen and carbon disulfide can be effected.<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
7.<br />
8.<br />
9.<br />
References<br />
Knight, A. R., Strausz, 0. P. and Gunning, H. E.,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85, 2349,<br />
(1963).<br />
Bryce, W. A. and Hinshelwood, C., J. Chem. Soc. 4, 3379, (1949).<br />
Nabor, G. W. and Smith, J. M., Ind. Eng. Chem. 45, 1272, (1953).<br />
Thacker, C. M. and Miller, E., Ind. Fng. Chem. 36, 182, (1944).<br />
Folkins, H. O., Miller, E. and Hennig, H., Ind. Eng. Chem. 2, 2201, (1950).<br />
Fisher, R. A. and Smith, J. M., Ind. Eng. Chem. 42, 704, (1950).<br />
Forney, R. C. and Smith, J. H., Ind. Eng. Chem. 43, 1841, (1951).<br />
Thomas, W. J. and Strickland-Constable, R. F., Trans. Farad. Soc. 53, 972, (1957)<br />
Vastola, F. J., Walker, P. L., Jr. and Wightman, J. T., Carbon 1, 11, (1963).