26.03.2013 Views

chemical physics of discharges - Argonne National Laboratory

chemical physics of discharges - Argonne National Laboratory

chemical physics of discharges - Argonne National Laboratory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

. a b c liqqid<br />

*iea.ctor L.!n/iLWH ~3a-l c c/Kwat t absorbent<br />

Al .l3.14 O.OUB7 73.81 firm<br />

81 6.33 3.02j6 118.74 none<br />

A2 10.70 (O.OU87) 19.43 f iliil<br />

I1<br />

I1<br />

A3 9.56<br />

12-93<br />

11<br />

A4 7.28 3.73<br />

II<br />

B1 12.99 0*0098 73.58 spray<br />

32 9.26 (0.0098) . 13.69 II<br />

B2 8.88 (U.0236) 35.15 none<br />

This is a reasoliable procedure within any one<br />

1,erticular series <strong>of</strong> reactors such as A1 to 4, but it is<br />

OiQY Eiproximate witii iiiffering reactor series( e.g. Reactor<br />

series A and B)due to dissimilarities in discharge geometries.<br />

JJi,c;uSSI #If.<br />

The i?ost notable overall feature <strong>of</strong> the results is the<br />

.qrogresuive increase in hydrazine yield obteined by tite use<br />

<strong>of</strong> a liqu-id absorbent and by pihing tne discharge. The<br />

himest averase. jield was obtained wit!i tile pulsing<br />

technique with or without liqcdd absorbent aid was approxinietely<br />

15 gms if H /KMH. Isolated values as nigi? as 20 @as/<br />

W h were obtaine8 %ut further experimental work is required<br />

before these values can be made reproducible. It is<br />

noteworthy that a yield <strong>of</strong> 15 pis/KMH is beginning to look<br />

comercially attractive although it must be remenbered that<br />

the fiiL;,.l. product cost will depend to a great extent on the<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> the product purification process downstream <strong>of</strong> the .<br />

reactor.<br />

There are several interesting features shown by this<br />

work which bear discussion. From the results set out in<br />

Fig. 2 to 4 it is evident that the hydrazine yield decreases<br />

with increasing discharge power intensity despite a corresponding<br />

increase in the decomposition <strong>of</strong> ammonia. The only<br />

reasonable explanation for this which 118s been advanced is<br />

that hydrazine is formed in the discharge bj a complex<br />

reaction mechanism and is subsequently decomposed by electron<br />

bombardment or other collision phenomena (4,6 ) .<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> a liquid absorbent resdts in a decrease in<br />

the slope <strong>of</strong> the energy yield-power density plot. This is<br />

well illustrated in both Pig. 2 and Fig.4 by comparing the<br />

slope <strong>of</strong> the plots with and drithout the use <strong>of</strong> liquid absorbent.<br />

This indicates that hydrazine is being reinoved from the<br />

diecharge by the liquid absorbent instead <strong>of</strong> being degraded.<br />

If the hydrazine were completely removed so that degradation<br />

did not occur the elope <strong>of</strong> this plot would be wither<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> discharge power or possibly positive. The very

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!