26.03.2013 Views

Cereals processing technology

Cereals processing technology

Cereals processing technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

68 <strong>Cereals</strong> <strong>processing</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />

4.8 Examples of transformed rice and maize<br />

4.8.1 Herbicide resistance<br />

Understanding the expression of simple reporter and selectable marker genes in<br />

transgenic plants is important in predicting the behaviour of agronomically<br />

useful genes introduced into crops. Consequently, it is imperative to assess gene<br />

expression in large seed populations. In this respect, Zhong et al. (1996) studied<br />

expression of the bar, potato proteinase inhibitor II and uidA (gus) genes,<br />

confirming their co-integration, co-inheritance and co-expression in 286 first<br />

generation (T1) plants and in 11,000 second seed generation (T2) maize plants.<br />

Similar, Brettschneider et al. (1997) followed the inheritance and expression of<br />

transgenes to the fourth seed generation in several inbred lines and sexual<br />

hybrids of maize. In field studies, Oard et al. (1996) assessed expression of the<br />

bar gene, giving resistance to the herbicide glufosinate, in the commercial rice<br />

cultivars Gulfmont, IR72 and Koshihikari. They confirmed that the bar gene<br />

was effective in conferring field-level resistance to the herbicide in rice,<br />

although, importantly, variation amongst transgenic lines required traditional<br />

breeding selection procedures to identify plants with high levels of herbicide<br />

resistance. These workers also emphasised the need to generate several<br />

independent transgenic lines of each cultivar for transgene assessments.<br />

4.8.2 Insect resistance<br />

Recent studies have reported the development of transgenic plants containing<br />

agronomically useful genes, in addition to those for herbicide resistance. Since<br />

insects cause substantial crop losses world-wide, it follows that engineering<br />

plants for insect resistance has, and will continue, to receive high priority. Stemboring<br />

insects are common pests in maize and rice, and resistance against these<br />

insects has been achieved, primarily, by the introduction and expression of<br />

modified or synthetic versions of the Bt -endotoxin, a natural insecticidal toxin<br />

from Bacillus thuringiensis. For example, Wunn et al. (1996) and Cheng et al.<br />

(1998) introduced the cryIA(b) gene into rice cultivars, including the indica<br />

cultivar IR58, to confer resistance to yellow stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulas)<br />

and striped stem borer (Chilo suppressalis), while Alam et al. (1998) were the<br />

first to engineer a lowland deep water rice for stem borer resistance using the<br />

same gene. In addition to giving resistance to stem-boring insects, expression of<br />

the cryIA(b) gene also inhibited feeding of the leaf-folding insects Cnaphalo<br />

crocis and Marasmia patnalis on transgenic rice (Wunn et al. 1996).<br />

Comparisons have been made of the expression of the Bt cryIA(b) gene driven<br />

by different promoters, including the constitutive 35S and Actin-1 promoters,<br />

with tissue-specific promoters from pith tissue and the pep-carboxylase (PEPC)<br />

promoter from chlorophyllous tissue of maize. The latter promoter gave high<br />

levels of transgene expression in leaves and stems of rice (Datta et al. 1998).<br />

Modified versions of the cryIA(b) gene have been used in rice transformation<br />

to give plants which induced 100% mortality in feeding yellow stem borers (Wu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!