26.03.2013 Views

Cereals processing technology

Cereals processing technology

Cereals processing technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

226 <strong>Cereals</strong> <strong>processing</strong> <strong>technology</strong><br />

The other contributor to crust formation is the continuing expansion of the<br />

inside of the dough piece from the final burst of carbon dioxide production from<br />

yeast fermentation and the thermal expansion of the gases trapped in the cellular<br />

structure of the dough. If the dough is contained in a pan then it can only expand<br />

upwards. This effect is most obvious at the top edges of the loaf, where the<br />

displacement is greatest and where a split develops as the top crust lifts,<br />

exposing a band of elongated inner crust cells, called the ‘oven break’, ‘oven<br />

spring’ or ‘shred’.<br />

Some types of bread are characterised by the crispness of their crust, e.g.<br />

baguette. The first few moments in the oven are vital for the formation of a<br />

glossy crust. To obtain gloss, it is essential that vapour condenses on the surface<br />

to form a starch paste that will gelatinize, form dextrins and eventually<br />

caramelise to give both colour and shine. If there is excess water, paste-type<br />

gelation takes place while with insufficient water crumb-type gelation occurs.<br />

To deliver the necessary water steam is introduced into the oven.<br />

10.9 Future trends in breadmaking<br />

10.9.1 Ingredients<br />

The trend in the reduction in permitted additives in breadmaking has probably<br />

reached its limits in Europe and many parts of the world. The current exception is<br />

the USA, which still permits a wide range of oxidants, including potassium bromate<br />

and azodicarbonamide which were banned in the UK in 1990 and 1995 respectively.<br />

The trend to limit ‘chemical’ additives has raised the profile of the use of enzyme<br />

active materials as more ‘natural’ additives. While the addition of many enzyme<br />

active materials does improve dough gas retention (Cauvain and Chamberlain,<br />

1988) such materials do not perform the same protein cross-linking function of<br />

oxidising materials. It is likely that the improving effect many enzyme-active<br />

materials contribute to bread quality is related to their ability to change dough<br />

rheology and therefore the influence of the moulding and <strong>processing</strong> operations.<br />

Recently developed and used enzymes may now be the product of the<br />

fermentation of genetically modified microorganisms or the result of the<br />

fractionation of existing amylase sources. These approaches have developed<br />

bacterial -amylases with heat stability profiles similar to that of fungal -<br />

amylase (Williams and Pullen, 1998). These products give the benefits of<br />

improvement in gas retention while avoiding the problem of excessive dextrin<br />

formation associated with cereal and ‘traditional’ bacterial amylases. In addition<br />

these newer amylases have been shown to have anti-staling properties over<br />

normal bread shelf life. This trend to using more targeted enzymes is likely to<br />

continue in the foreseeable future.<br />

Since a significant proportion of bread quality derives from the wheats that<br />

are used in the milling grist it is certain that greater attention will be paid to<br />

matching wheat/flour quality with end use. This may entail selective breeding or<br />

greater attention to agronomic practices.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!