26.03.2013 Views

coal selection criteria for industrial pfbc firing project 3.2 - CCSD

coal selection criteria for industrial pfbc firing project 3.2 - CCSD

coal selection criteria for industrial pfbc firing project 3.2 - CCSD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. CONCLUSIONS<br />

“Coal Selection Criteria <strong>for</strong> Industrial PFBC Firing”<br />

Combustion inefficiency was one of the potential problems faced by PFBC plants. It was<br />

mainly caused by unburnt char elutriation. For the relatively narrow range of <strong>coal</strong> rank of<br />

Australian export <strong>coal</strong>s, unburnt char elutriation from PFBC correlated with the <strong>coal</strong>’s<br />

petrographic composition, specifically with the ratio Telovitrinite : Inertinite. This effect<br />

was attributed to the highly swelling Telovitrinite generating larger diameter pores in the<br />

devolatilised char, allowing greater combustion-enhanced attrition from the pore mouths<br />

on the char surface. A Telovitrinite : Inertinite ratio below 0.200 would be satisfactory<br />

and a Telovitrinite : Inertinite ratio above 1.871 would indicate an unsuitable <strong>coal</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

PFBC <strong>firing</strong>.<br />

Other factors reported to affect PFBC combustion efficiency include Coal reactivity,<br />

volatile content, swelling, fragmentation and calorific value. These factors were studied<br />

over a wider range of <strong>coal</strong> rank, indicating that combustion inefficiency increased with<br />

<strong>coal</strong> rank. However, the general correlation with <strong>coal</strong> rank did not always predict<br />

commercial-scale PFBC per<strong>for</strong>mance, so the correlation (Eq. 1) with petrographic<br />

analysis is recommended <strong>for</strong> assessing sub-bituminous and bituminous <strong>coal</strong>s.<br />

Bed agglomeration or sinter egg <strong>for</strong>mation occurred at Escatrón, Värtan, Tidd, Tomatoh-<br />

Atsuma, Wakamatsu and Karita. The <strong>coal</strong>-related factor which caused bed agglomeration<br />

was the ash fusion temperature. Low ash fusion temperature generated agglomeration.<br />

Despite their high combustion efficiencies, low rank <strong>coal</strong>s contain high levels of alkali<br />

that caused agglomeration problems. Two of the Japanese commercial plants <strong>firing</strong><br />

Australian export <strong>coal</strong>s specify < 7% Fe2O3 in the <strong>coal</strong> ash and one also specifies an ash<br />

fusion temperature > 1200 o C. However, since this problem still limits the maximum<br />

output from the Karita plant, it warrants the further research being conducted in <strong>CCSD</strong>.<br />

Another problem in PFBC plants was fouling and deposit <strong>for</strong>mation. The key element<br />

responsible <strong>for</strong> this was iron, which decomposed and oxidized during combustion. Coals<br />

with low iron content are advised to minimize this problem.<br />

Page 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!