coal selection criteria for industrial pfbc firing project 3.2 - CCSD
coal selection criteria for industrial pfbc firing project 3.2 - CCSD
coal selection criteria for industrial pfbc firing project 3.2 - CCSD
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5. CONCLUSIONS<br />
“Coal Selection Criteria <strong>for</strong> Industrial PFBC Firing”<br />
Combustion inefficiency was one of the potential problems faced by PFBC plants. It was<br />
mainly caused by unburnt char elutriation. For the relatively narrow range of <strong>coal</strong> rank of<br />
Australian export <strong>coal</strong>s, unburnt char elutriation from PFBC correlated with the <strong>coal</strong>’s<br />
petrographic composition, specifically with the ratio Telovitrinite : Inertinite. This effect<br />
was attributed to the highly swelling Telovitrinite generating larger diameter pores in the<br />
devolatilised char, allowing greater combustion-enhanced attrition from the pore mouths<br />
on the char surface. A Telovitrinite : Inertinite ratio below 0.200 would be satisfactory<br />
and a Telovitrinite : Inertinite ratio above 1.871 would indicate an unsuitable <strong>coal</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />
PFBC <strong>firing</strong>.<br />
Other factors reported to affect PFBC combustion efficiency include Coal reactivity,<br />
volatile content, swelling, fragmentation and calorific value. These factors were studied<br />
over a wider range of <strong>coal</strong> rank, indicating that combustion inefficiency increased with<br />
<strong>coal</strong> rank. However, the general correlation with <strong>coal</strong> rank did not always predict<br />
commercial-scale PFBC per<strong>for</strong>mance, so the correlation (Eq. 1) with petrographic<br />
analysis is recommended <strong>for</strong> assessing sub-bituminous and bituminous <strong>coal</strong>s.<br />
Bed agglomeration or sinter egg <strong>for</strong>mation occurred at Escatrón, Värtan, Tidd, Tomatoh-<br />
Atsuma, Wakamatsu and Karita. The <strong>coal</strong>-related factor which caused bed agglomeration<br />
was the ash fusion temperature. Low ash fusion temperature generated agglomeration.<br />
Despite their high combustion efficiencies, low rank <strong>coal</strong>s contain high levels of alkali<br />
that caused agglomeration problems. Two of the Japanese commercial plants <strong>firing</strong><br />
Australian export <strong>coal</strong>s specify < 7% Fe2O3 in the <strong>coal</strong> ash and one also specifies an ash<br />
fusion temperature > 1200 o C. However, since this problem still limits the maximum<br />
output from the Karita plant, it warrants the further research being conducted in <strong>CCSD</strong>.<br />
Another problem in PFBC plants was fouling and deposit <strong>for</strong>mation. The key element<br />
responsible <strong>for</strong> this was iron, which decomposed and oxidized during combustion. Coals<br />
with low iron content are advised to minimize this problem.<br />
Page 23