26.03.2013 Views

coal selection criteria for industrial pfbc firing project 3.2 - CCSD

coal selection criteria for industrial pfbc firing project 3.2 - CCSD

coal selection criteria for industrial pfbc firing project 3.2 - CCSD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ABSTRACT<br />

“Coal Selection Criteria <strong>for</strong> Industrial PFBC Firing”<br />

Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustion (PFBC) is one of the clean <strong>coal</strong> technologies.<br />

There are several PFBC plants operating all over the world. As this technology is<br />

relatively new, some problems were encountered during the plants’ operation. These<br />

include combustion inefficiency, bed agglomeration, cyclone clogging, filter blockage,<br />

gas turbine and in-bed heat exchanger tube erosion and corrosion. In this report, we have<br />

focussed only on those aspects of the problems which were <strong>coal</strong>-related, since those<br />

aspects affect <strong>coal</strong> <strong>selection</strong> <strong>for</strong> PFBC.<br />

Combustion inefficiency was mainly caused by unburnt char elutriation from the bed. For<br />

Australian export <strong>coal</strong>s, it was found that unburnt char elutriation was related to the ratio<br />

of Telovitrinite : Inertinite. For a wider range of <strong>coal</strong> rank, there was generally a decrease<br />

in combustion efficiency with increasing rank, but this generalisation did not always<br />

predict <strong>coal</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance in commercial PFBC plants. Hence, petrographic analysis is<br />

preferred <strong>for</strong> bituminous and sub-bituminous <strong>coal</strong>s. A Telovitrinite : Inertinite ratio <<br />

0.200 is recommended <strong>for</strong> satisfactory PFBC per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Low ash fusion temperature generated agglomeration. Despite their high combustion<br />

efficiencies, low rank <strong>coal</strong>s contain high alkali that caused agglomeration problems. Two<br />

of the Japanese commercial plants <strong>firing</strong> Australian export <strong>coal</strong>s specify < 7% Fe2O3 in<br />

the <strong>coal</strong> ash and one also specifies an ash fusion temperature > 1200 o C.<br />

During combustion, iron contained in the <strong>coal</strong>s was oxidized and decomposed, causing<br />

fouling and deposit <strong>for</strong>mation. Low iron content <strong>coal</strong>s were recommended to be used to<br />

minimize deposit <strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

Two solutions to filter blockage problems were to use ash <strong>for</strong> maintaining bed inventory<br />

and to use <strong>coal</strong>s with high Al2O3 and SiO2 contents in their ash, which agglomerated to<br />

larger ash particles. The recommended method to overcome filter blockage is to allow<br />

larger particles into the filter which <strong>for</strong>m a layer of cake on the filter surface instead of<br />

Page 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!