26.03.2013 Views

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 how increase of diesel-exposure concentration affects initiation rate over low-exposure<br />

2 concentrations. Similarly, it is important to know the relationship between dose of carbon core<br />

3 and cell (!-cells in particular) proliferation at low concentration.<br />

4 Another aspect of uncertainty is the use of lung burdens (organics and carbon core)<br />

5 calculated by mathematical model, rather than actually measured. However, the impact of this<br />

6 uncertainty with regard to the conclusions reached in this report is not expected to be<br />

7 significantly altered even if the model-based dosimetries are not accurate because the relative<br />

8 patterns of lung burdens between high- and low-exposure concentratiops, and betweenanimals<br />

9 and humans should be about the same. Although there is some observed total lung burden, these<br />

1 0 data are not used because of the following reasons.<br />

1 l<br />

1 2 1. The observed data are not separated by organics and carbon core.<br />

13<br />

14 2. There are no human data-these data are needed to predict risk in humans.<br />

15<br />

16 3. The observed data do not go beyond 730 days.<br />

17<br />

18 4. The desire is to be consistent with Chapter 11 so that results can be compared.<br />

19<br />

20 B.9. DISC<strong>US</strong>SIONS ABOUT FUTURE RESEARCH NEEDS<br />

21 The single most important use of a biologically based dose-response model in the cancer<br />

·22 risk assessment is to reduce uncertainty of low-dose extrapolation when the mechanism <strong>for</strong> tumor<br />

23 response observed at high doses differs drastically from the low doses. However, this report can<br />

24 focus only on the use of the model to guide future research rather than to actually reduce<br />

25 uncertainty of risk estimate because of our inability to obtain biological parameters in the model.<br />

26 If a chemical is known to induce disproportionately larger cell proliferation (in normal, iriitiated,<br />

27 and/or malignant cells) at high doses than at low doses, then a model that reflects this fact would<br />

28 be useful. With this in mind, our ef<strong>for</strong>t should be to identify "components" of carcinogenesis ·<br />

29 (e.g., increase of mitotic rate) that are disproportionately more affected at high doses than at low<br />

30 doses and to develop models that incorporate those high-dose effects. For the diesel risk<br />

31 assessment, the "components" that require further study include effects of organics and carbon<br />

32 core, individually or jointly, on initiation, proliferation, conversion, and progression steps of<br />

33 carcinogenesis. In order to use biologically based models of carcinogenesis in risk assessments,<br />

34 one needs to know the relationship between parameter values in a model and exposure (or dose).<br />

3 5 Ideally, some of these parameters, if not all, should be measured directly .in the laboratory, or<br />

36 indirectly estimating from neoplastic and preneoplastic lesions (e.g., number of foci, adenomas,<br />

37 and tumors in a lung).<br />

. 2/1/98 B-15 DRAFT--DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!