26.03.2013 Views

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 d: Dose of organics, mg/cm 2 of lung epithelial surface<br />

2<br />

3 fll: Dose-related initiation rate (per cell per day) that depends on flo (background rate), d, and<br />

4 D by f.! I =·f.!o(l +ad+ bD); a and bare paramaters to be estimated.<br />

5<br />

6 flz: Probability of producing a malignant cell at the end of an initiated cell (1-cell) lifetime<br />

7<br />

8 a: The probability that anI-cell divides into two daughter cells at the end of its lifetime<br />

9<br />

1 0 q: Probability that a single malignant cell will develop into a maligl}ant tumor<br />

11<br />

12 y: 1/y is the mean I-celllifetime in days; a cell lifetime ends if it either goes into mitosis, or<br />

13 cell death. Note that if one assumes that the probability <strong>for</strong> a cell to get into mitosis is<br />

1 4 about the same as cell death then the mean cell lifetime can be conveniently interpreted as<br />

1 5 time to mitosis (i.e., cell turnover time); thus, shorter cell lifetime implies more frequent<br />

16 cell division. Note that the time to mitosis is a random variable here, not a fixed constant<br />

1 7 as in the assumption made in the Greenfield et al. (1984) model that has been used<br />

18 extensively by Cohen and Ellwein (1988) to analyze experimental bladder cancer.<br />

19<br />

20 · N: Number of(normal) target cells<br />

21<br />

22 B.3.2. Practical Considerations<br />

23 By statistical theory alone the E-M algorithm developed in this report provides an elegant.<br />

24 procedure which can be used to test hypotheses whether a particular parameter is influenced by<br />

25 organics and carbon core individually or both together. For instance, one could postulate that the<br />

26 parameter y (reciprocal of which represents mean cell lifetime) is given by y(d,Di) = y 0 + Ynd +<br />

27 y 12 Di, and then proceed to test a null hypothesis that y 11 = 0, no effect of organics on cell<br />

28 lifetime. This temptation, however, must be resisted because there would be too many<br />

2 9 parameters that must be estimated if such statistical tests are to be per<strong>for</strong>med. There<strong>for</strong>e, rather<br />

30 than per<strong>for</strong>ming such a statistical exercise, we proceed with a biologically plausible assumption<br />

31 that parameters q and y depend only on lung burden of carbon core, C.<br />

32 The duration ofthe Mauderly et al. study was about 940 days. To construct a dose-<br />

33 response model with time-dependent lung burden, the time interval (0,940] is divided into<br />

34 five subintervals; each subinterval spans 6 mo except <strong>for</strong> the last subinterval, which spans from<br />

35 730 (2 years) to 940 days. Corresponding to an ambient air concentration of diesel emissions in<br />

3 6 mg/m 3 , the deposition-retention model developed by Yu et al. is useq to calculate dosimetric ( d,<br />

37 Di), I= 1, 2, ... , 5, where organics dose, d, is not changing with time because it reaches steady<br />

38 state quickly after exposure begins and Di is the lung burden of carbon core during the ith<br />

3 9 subinterval.<br />

40 The assumptions about dose-parameters relationship are given below.<br />

2/1198 B-5 DRAFT--DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!