26.03.2013 Views

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 Approximately 20,000 miners are employed, but not all of them are currently working in the<br />

2 mines. <strong>Diesel</strong> engines were introduced in the metal mines in the early to mid-1960s. Although<br />

3 all these miries use diesel equipment, it is difficult to estimate how many of these miners were<br />

4 actually exposed.to diesel fumes.<br />

5 <strong>Diesel</strong> engines were introduced in coal mines atan even later date, and their use is still<br />

6 quite limited. In 1983, approximately 1 ,000 diesel units were in place in underground coal<br />

7 mines, up from about 200 units in 1977 (Daniel, 1984). The number of units per mine varies<br />

8 greatly; one mine may account <strong>for</strong> more than 100 units.<br />

9 Even if it were possible to estimate how many miners (metal and coal) were exposed to<br />

1 0 diesel exhaust, it would be very difficult to separate out the confounding effects of other potential<br />

11 pulmonary carcinogens, such as radon decay products, heavy metals (such as arsenic,<br />

12 chromium), etc. Furthermore, the relatively short latency period limits the usefulness of these<br />

13 cohorts of miners.<br />

14<br />

15 8.5.1. The Cohort Mortality Studies<br />

16 The cohort studies mainly demonstrated an increase in lung cancer. Studies of bus<br />

17 company workers by Waller (1981), Rushton et al. (1983), and Edling et al. (1987) failed to<br />

18 demonstrate any statistically significant excess risk of lung cancer, but these studies have certain<br />

19 methodological problems, such as small sample sizes, short follow-up periods Gust 6 years in the<br />

20 Rushton et al. study), lack of in<strong>for</strong>mation on confounding variables, and lack of analysis by<br />

21 duration of exposure, duration of employment, or latency that preclude their use in determining<br />

22 the carcinogenicity of diesel exhaust. Although the Waller (1981) study had a 25-year follow-up<br />

23 period, the cohort was restricted to employees (ages 45 to 64) currently in service. Employees<br />

24 who left the job earlier, as well as those who were still employed after age 64 and who may have<br />

25 .died from cancer, were excluded.<br />

26 Wong et al. (1985) conducted a mortality study of heavy equipment operators that<br />

27 demonstrated a significant increased risk of liver cancer in total and in various subcohorts. The<br />

28 same analysis also showed statistically significant deficits in cancers of the large intestine and<br />

29 rectum. Metastases from the cancers of the large intestine and rectum in the liver probably were<br />

30 misclassified as primary liver cancer, which led to an observed excess risk. This study did<br />

31 demonstrate a nonsignificant positive trend <strong>for</strong> cancer of the lung With length of membership and<br />

32 latency. Analysis of deceased retirees showed a significant excess oflung cancer. Individuals<br />

33 without work histories who started work prior to 1967, when records were not kept, may have<br />

34 been in the same jobs <strong>for</strong> the longest period oftime. Workers without job histories included<br />

35 those who had the same job be<strong>for</strong>e and after 1967 arid thus may have worked about 12 to 14<br />

2/1/98 8-60 DRAFT --DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!