26.03.2013 Views

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 occupations. The observed absence of an association <strong>for</strong> exposure to asbestos, a well-established<br />

2 lung carcinogen, may be explained by the misclassification errors in exposure status or by<br />

3 sample size constraints (not enough power). Likewise, the association <strong>for</strong> diesel exhaust<br />

4 reported by only 7 cases and 17 controls also may have gone undetected because of low power.<br />

5· In conclusion, there is insufficient evidence from this study to confirm or refute an association<br />

6 between lung cancer and diesel exhaust exposure.<br />

7<br />

8 8.3.5. Gars hick et al. (1987): A Case-Control Study of Lung Cant;er and <strong>Diesel</strong> Exhaust<br />

9 Exposure in Railroad Workers<br />

1 0 An earlier pilot study of the mortality of railroad workers by the same investigators<br />

11· (Schenker et al., 1984) found a moderately high risk of lung cancer among the workers who were<br />

12 exposed to diesel exhaust as compared to those who were not. This study was designed to<br />

13 evaluate the feasibility of conducting a large retrospective cohort study. On the basis of these<br />

14 findings the·investigators conducted a case-control study of lung cancer in the same population.<br />

15 The population base <strong>for</strong> this case-control study was approximately 650,000 active and retired<br />

16 male U.S. railroad workers· with 1 0 years or more of railroad service who were born in 1900 or<br />

17 later. The U.S. Railroad Retirement Board· (RRB ), which operates the retirement system, is<br />

18 separate from the Social Security System, and to qualify <strong>for</strong> the retirement or survivor benefits<br />

19 the workers had to acquire 1 0 years or more _of service. In<strong>for</strong>mation on deaths that occurred<br />

20 between March 1, 1981, and February 28, 1982, was obtained from the RRB. For 75% ofthe<br />

21 deceased population, death certificates were obtained from the RRB, and, <strong>for</strong> the remaining 25%,<br />

22 they were obtained from the appropriate state departments of health. Cause of death was coded<br />

23 according to the eighth revision of the lCD. The cases were selected from deaths with primary<br />

24 lung cancer, which was the underlying causeof death in most cases. Each case was matched to·<br />

25 two deceased-controls whose dates of birth were within 2.5 years of the date of birth of the case<br />

26 and whose dates of death were within 31 days of the date of death noted in the case. Controls<br />

27 were then selected randomly from workers who did not have cancer noted anywhere on their<br />

28 death certificates and who did not die of suicide or of accidental or Unknown causes.<br />

29 Each subject's work history was determined from a yearly job report filed by his<br />

30 employer with the RRB from 1959 until death or retirement. The year 1959 was chosen as the<br />

31 effective start of diesel exhaust exposure <strong>for</strong> this study, since by this time 95% of the<br />

32 locomotives in the United States were diesel powered. Investigators acknowledge that because<br />

33 the transition to diesel-powered engines took place in the early 1950s, some workers had<br />

34 additional exposure prior to 1959; however, if a worker had died or retired prior to 1959, he was<br />

35 considered unexposed. Exposure to diesel exhaust was considered to be dichotomous <strong>for</strong> this<br />

2/1/98 8-28 DRAFT--DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!