Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

1 In a follow-up study, strain A mice were exposed to diesel exhaust <strong>for</strong> 8 mo (Kaplan et 2 al., 1983; White et al., 1983). After exposure to the highest exhaust concentration (1.5 mg/m 3 ), 3 the percentage of mice with pulmonary adenomas and the mean number of tumors per mouse 4 were significantly less (p
Page 1 and 2:
DRAFT DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE Health A
Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTS (continued) 2.5.1. Volatil
Page 9 and 10:
CONTENTS (continued) 11.2.1. H.fl.Z
Page 12:
LIST OF TABLES (continued) 2-14. Me
Page 17 and 18:
PREFACE This draft health assessmen
Page 20 and 21:
AUTHORS, REVIEWERS, AND CONTRIBUTOR
Page 22:
l. INTRODUCTION 1 Diesel engines ar
Page 42 and 43:
1 achieved by using specific solven
Page 45 and 46:
Nitro-PAH• Table 2-10. Concentrat
Page 50:
1 pollutants depends on the amount
Page 56:
1 For the simplest alkoxy radicals,
Page 63 and 64:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 H ON0
Page 66 and 67:
1 conditions (Pitts et al., 1985c )
Page 69:
Table 2-14. Mean particle, gas, and
Page 72 and 73:
1 sample collection. There was no b
Page 75:
1 of downtown Los Angeles (Arey et
Page 81:
1 exposures. This is a complex ques
Page 85:
1 Dunstan, TDJ; Mauldin, RF; Jinxia
Page 88 and 89:
1 Lipkea, WH; DeJoode, AD; Christen
Page 90:
1 Pitts, JN, Jr; Sweetman, JA; Ziel
Page 95:
1 NOTE TO READERS CHAPTER3 2 Becaus
Page 101:
1 volume basis (Table 4-1 ). This i
Page 109:
1 Pritchard (1989), utilizing data
Page 115:
1 4.3.3.3. Potential Mechanisms for
Page 123:
1 not accurately reflect the actual
Page 131 and 132:
1 Lee, PS; Chan, TL; Hering, WE. (1
Page 137:
1 one-half units up to 3, strong (O
Page 148:
Study Ulfvarson et a!. (1987) Batti
Page 155:
N -,_. -\0 00 VI N ,_. 0 § I I 0 0
Page 163:
1 control]). Heinrich et al. (1986a
Page 174:
1 Heinrich et al. ( 1986a; see also
Page 185:
1 thoracic area at subsequent times
Page 189:
1 with matched controls for the num
Page 196 and 197:
----- N \0 00 VI I 0'1 N tJ § I I
Page 201:
1 In related studies, Navarro et al
Page 210:
1 Mauderly et al. (1987b) evaluated
Page 216 and 217:
1 pattern of adverse effects on res
Page 218:
1 DPM concentrations) that resulted
Page 221:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Page 226 and 227:
1 Klosterkotter, W; Blinemann, G. (
Page 228 and 229:
1 Misiorowski, RL; Strom, KA; Vosta
Page 232: 1 Wright, ES. (1986) Effects of sho
Page 235: 1 Studies showing these effects are
Page 238: 1 exposure level. In the 0.3 5 mg/m
Page 251 and 252: 1 to derive the RfC. The discussion
Page 253 and 254: 1 The BMC values are the lower 95%
Page 255: Table 6-5. Results of benchmark con
Page 262: 1 U.S. Environmental Protection Age
Page 274 and 275: 1 the latter, 16 were classified as
Page 279 and 280: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Page 282: 1 burdens of the NMRI mice after 12
Page 293: 1 In a similar study, 33 four-week-
Page 336:
1 well as concrete and asphalt work
Page 343:
1 maximum likelihood method adjusti
Page 355 and 356:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Page 363 and 364:
1 8.4.7. Steineck et al. (1990): In
Page 365:
N ...... --- \0 ---- 00 00 I VI V
Page 371:
1 years longer; these workers exhib
Page 376 and 377:
1 from surrogates (next of kin bein
Page 380:
1 evidence falls just short of bein
Page 383:
1 Steen land, K. (1986) Lung cancer
Page 387:
1 and Ouar loci in CHO cells; Curre
Page 390 and 391:
1 Mutagenicity data have been appli
Page 392:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Page 395:
10. METABOLISM AND MECHANISM OF ACT
Page 398 and 399:
1 to 107 m 2 ig (organics fully ext
Page 406:
1 extract of DP\;1 failed to increa
Page 415:
1 In study by Wolff et al. (1990) d
Page 422:
1 Lee. KP; Ulrich, CE; Geil, RG; Tr
Page 431 and 432:
1 In the comparative potency method
Page 435:
1 multiplying by 70, the estimated
Page 440 and 441:
Table 11-4. Incidence of lung tumor
Page 443 and 444:
1 at the doses used, the estimated
Page 447:
1 though specific particle surface
Page 451 and 452:
1 Garshick, E; Schenker, MB; Munoz,
Page 460:
1 alveolar regions of the lungs. At
Page 464 and 465:
1 radicals present on the particle
Page 471:
1 12.3.2.1. Derivation of an Inhala
Page 475:
1 For convenience EPA has started w
Page 478 and 479:
1 extrapolate risk to low doses. Th
Page 480:
1 12.3.3.2.4. Assessing risk using
Page 486:
1 2 3 4 .5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1
Page 494 and 495:
1 Health Effects Institute. (1995)
Page 503 and 504:
APPENDIX A. EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL A
Page 505:
Page 509:
Page 512 and 513:
Page 514:
1 B.l. INTRODUCTION 2 As previously
Page 519:
Parametera llo a b llz qo ql Yo Y1
Page 524:
Table B-7. Effect of changing dose-
Page 527:
1 how increase of diesel-exposure c
Page 532:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Given a 2x(x),
Page 538 and 539:
Appendix C Models for Calculating L
Page 540:
1 respiratory tract by various depo
Page 551 and 552:
1 The values of (DFh and (DF)A over
Page 555:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .9 10 direction. Fo
Page 575:
1 Yu, C.P.; Xu, G.B. (1987) Predict
show all

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?