26.03.2013 Views

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 with matched controls <strong>for</strong> the number of B and T lymphocytes and null cells isolated from the<br />

2 tracheobronchial lymph nodes, spleen, and blood. Cell viability as measured by trypan blue<br />

3 exclusion was comparable between the exposed and control groups. The results of this study and<br />

4 others on the effects of exposure to diesel exhaust on the immune system are summarized in.<br />

· 5 Dible 5-8.<br />

6 Mentnech et al. (1984) examined the effect of diesel exhaust on the immune system of<br />

7 rats. Exposures were to 2 mg/m 3 DPM <strong>for</strong> 7 h/day, 5 days/week <strong>for</strong> up to 2 years. Rats exposed<br />

8 <strong>for</strong> 12 and 24 mo weretested <strong>for</strong> immunocompetency by determining '!lltibody-producing cells<br />

9 in the spleen 4 days after immunization with sheep erythrocytes. The proliferative response of<br />

1 0 splenic T -lymphocytes to the mitogens concanavalin A and phytohemagglutinin was assessed in<br />

11 rats exposed <strong>for</strong> 24 mo. There were no significant differences between the exposed and control<br />

12 animals. Results obtained from these two assays indicate that neither humoral immunity<br />

13 (assessed by enumerating antibody-producing cells) nor cellular immunity (assessed by the<br />

14 lymphocyte blast trans<strong>for</strong>mation assay) were markedly affected by the exposures.<br />

15 Bice et al. ( 1985) evaluated whether or not exposure to diesel exhaust would alter<br />

16 antibody immune responses induced after lung immunization of rats and mice. Exposures were<br />

17 to 0.35, 3.5, or 7.1 mg/m 3 DPM <strong>for</strong> 7 h/day, 5 days/week <strong>for</strong> 24 mo. Chamber controls and<br />

18 exposed animals were immunized by intratracheal instillation of sheep red blood cells (SRBC)<br />

. .<br />

19 after 6, 12, 18, or 24 mo of exposure. No suppression in the immune response occurred in either<br />

20 species. After 12, 18, and 24 mo of exposure, the total number of anti-SRBC IgM antibody<br />

21 <strong>for</strong>ming cells (AFCs) was elevated in rats, but not in mice, exposed to 3.5 or 7.1 mg/m 3 DPM;<br />

· 22 after 6 mo of exposure, only the 7.1 mg/m 3 level was found to have caused this response in rats.<br />

23 The number of AFC per 10 6 lymphoid cells in lung-associated lymph nodes and the levels of<br />

24 specific IgM, IgG, or IgA in rat sera were not significantly altered. The investigators concluded<br />

25 that the increased cellularity and the presence ofDPM in the lung-associated lymph nodes had<br />

26 only a minimal effect on the immune and antigen filtration function of these tissues. Takafuji et<br />

27 al. (1987) evaluated the IgE antibody response of mice inoculated intranasally at intervals of 3<br />

28 weeks with varying doses of a suspension ofDPM in ovalbumin.<br />

29 Antiovalbumin IgE antibody titers, assayed by passive cutaneous anaphylaxis, were<br />

30 enhanced by doses as low as 1 J.lg of particles compared with immunization with ovalbumin<br />

31 alone.<br />

32 The inhalation of diesel exhaust appeared to have only minimal effects on the immune<br />

33 status of rats and guinea pigs. Conversely, intranasally delivered doses as low as 1 J.lg ofDPM<br />

· 34 exerted an adjuvant activity <strong>for</strong> IgE antibody production in mice. Further studies of the effects of<br />

211/98 5-55 DRAFT --DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!