26.03.2013 Views

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 S. typhimurium were inconclusive because of the high mortality rates in the controls. The mice<br />

2 exposed to diesel exhaust did not exhibit an enhanced mortality when challenged with the<br />

3 influenza virus. Hatch et al. ( 1985) found no changes in the susceptibility of mice to Group C<br />

4 Streptococcus sp. infection following intratracheal injection of 100 !J.g ofDPM suspended in<br />

· 5 unbuffered saline.<br />

6 Hahon et al. (1985) assessed virus-induced mortality, virus multiplication with<br />

7 concomitant interferon (IFN) levels (lungs and sera), antibody response, and lung histopathology<br />

8 in mice exposed to diesel exhaust prior to infectious challenge with Aa/PR/8/34 influenza virus.<br />

9 Weanling mice were exposed to the diesel exhaust containing 2 mg/m 3 DPM <strong>for</strong> 7 h/day, 5<br />

10 days/week. In mice exposed <strong>for</strong> 1, 3, and 6 mo, mortality was similar between the exposed and<br />

11 control mice. In mice exposed <strong>for</strong> 3 and 6 mo, however, there were significant increases in the<br />

12 percentage of mice having lung consolidation, higher virus growth, depressed interferon levels,<br />

13 and a fourfold reduction in hemagglutinin antibody levels; these effects were not seen after the<br />

14 1-mo exposure.<br />

15 The effects of diesel exhaust on the pulmonary defense mechanisms are determined by<br />

16 three critical factors related to exposure: the concentrations of the pollutants, the exposure<br />

17 duration, and the exposure pattern. Higher doses of diesel exhaust as determined by an increase<br />

18 in one or more of these three variables have been reported to increase the numbers of AMs,<br />

. .<br />

19 PMNs, and Type II cells in the lung, whereas lower doses fail to produce such changes. The<br />

20 single most significant contributor to the impairment of the pulmonary defense mechanisms<br />

21 appears to be an excessive accumulation ofDPM, particularly as particle-laden aggregates of<br />

22 AMs. Such an accumulation would result from an increase in deposition and/or a reduction in<br />

23 clearance. The deposition of particles does not appear to change significantly following<br />

24 exposure to equivalent diesel exhaust doses over time. Because of the significant nonlinearity in<br />

25 particle accumulation between low and high doses of diesel exhaust exposure, coupled with no<br />

. -<br />

26 evidence of increased particle deposition, an impairment in one or more of the mechanisms of<br />

27 pulmonary defense appears to be responsible <strong>for</strong> the DPM accumulation and subsequent<br />

28 pathological sequelae. The time of onset of pulmonary clearance impairment was dependent<br />

29 both on the magnitude and on the duration of exposures. For example, <strong>for</strong> rats exposed <strong>for</strong><br />

30 . 7 h/day, 5 days/week <strong>for</strong> 104 weeks, the concentration needed to induce pulmonary clearance<br />

31 impairment appears to lie between 0.35 and 2.0 mg/m 3 D:PM.<br />

32<br />

33 5.1.2.3.5. Effects on the immune system. The effects of diesel exhaust on the immune system<br />

· 34 of guinea pigs were investigated by Dziedzic {1981 ). Exposures were to 1.5 mg/m 3 DPM <strong>for</strong> 20<br />

35 hlday, 5.5 days/week <strong>for</strong> up to 8 weeks. There was no effect of diesel exposure when compared<br />

211/98 5-54 DRAFT --DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!