26.03.2013 Views

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

Health Assessment Document for Diesel Emissions - NSCEP | US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 monkeys there were no specific histopathological effects reported (see next section) although<br />

2 particle aggregates were reported in the distal airways, suggesting more small airway deposition.<br />

3 Gross (1981) exposed rats <strong>for</strong> 20 h!day, 5.5 days/week <strong>for</strong> 87 weeks to diesel exhaust<br />

4 containing 1.5 mg/m 3 particulate matter. When the data were normalized (e.g., indices expressed<br />

5 in units of airflow or volume <strong>for</strong> each animal by its own <strong>for</strong>ced expiratory volume), there were<br />

6 no apparent functionally significant changes occurring in the lungs at 38 weeks of exposure that<br />

7 might be attributable to the inhalation of diesel exhaust. After 87 weeks of exposure, functional<br />

8 residual capacity (FRC).and its component volumes (expiratory reserve [ER] and residual<br />

9 volume [RV]), maximum expiratory flow (MEF) at 40% FVC, MEF at 20% FVC, and FEV 0 _ 1<br />

1 0 were significantly greater in the diesel-exposed rats. An observed increase in airflow at the end<br />

11 of the <strong>for</strong>ced expiratory maneuver when a decreased airflow would be expected from the<br />

12 increased FRC, ER, and RV data (the typical scenario of human pulmonary disease) showed<br />

13 these data to be inconsistent with known clinically significant health effects. Furthermore,<br />

14 although the lung volume changes in the diesel-exposed rats could have been indicative of<br />

15 emphysema or chronic obstructive lung disease, this interpretation was contradicted by the<br />

16 airflow data, which suggest simultaneous lowering of the resistance of the distal airways.<br />

17 Heinrich et al. (1982) evaluated the pulmonary function ofrats exposed to a concentration<br />

18 of3.9 mg/m 3 particulate matter <strong>for</strong> 7 to 8 h!day, 5 days/week <strong>for</strong> 2 years. When compared with a<br />

19 control group, no significant changes in respiratory rate, minute volume, compliance, or<br />

20 resistance occurred in the exposed group (n,umber of rats per group was not stated).<br />

21 Hamsters (eight or nine per group) were exposed 8 h!day, 7 days/week, <strong>for</strong> 6 mo to<br />

22 concentrations of either about 6 mg/m 3 or about 12 mg/m 3 particulate matter (Vinegar et al.,<br />

23 1980, 1981a,b). Vital capacity, vital capacity/lung weight ratio, residual lung volume by water<br />

24 displacement, and C0 2 diffusing capacity de.creased significantly in hamsters exposed to<br />

25 6 mg/m 3 particulate matter. Static deflation volume-pressure curves showed depressed deflation<br />

26 volumes <strong>for</strong> diesel-exposed hamsters when volumes were corrected <strong>for</strong> body weight and even<br />

27 greater depressed volumes when volumes were corrected <strong>for</strong> lung weight. However, when<br />

28 volumes were expressed as percentage of vital capacity, the diesel-exposed hamsters had higher<br />

29 lung volumes at 0 and 5 em H 20. In the absence of confirmatory histopathology, the authors<br />

30 tentatively concluded that these elevated lung volumes and the significantly reduced diffusing<br />

31 capacity in the same hamsters were indicative of possible emphysematous changes in the lung.<br />

32 Similar lung function changes were reported in hamsters exposed at 12 mg/m 3 particulate matter;<br />

33 but detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation was not reported. It was stated, however, that the decrease in vital<br />

34 capacity was 176% greater in the second experiment than in the first.<br />

211/98 . 5-32 DRAFT--DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!