Complete volume with articles 1 to 35 - Cucurbit Breeding - North ...
Complete volume with articles 1 to 35 - Cucurbit Breeding - North ... Complete volume with articles 1 to 35 - Cucurbit Breeding - North ...
Table 1 (continued).z Cultivar Country Disease Rank or accession of origin rating 81 PI 183217 Egypt 5.00 82 PI 184800 Nigeria 5.00 83 PI 185636 Ghana 5.00 84 PI 186489 Nigeria 5.00 85 PI 189317 Zaire 5.00 86 PI 193490 Ethiopia 5.00 87 PI 193963 Ethiopia 5.00 88 PI 195562 Ethiopia 5.00 89 PI 222137 Algeria 5.00 90 PI 254737 Senegal 5.00 91 PI 254741 Senegal 5.00 92 PI 271774 South Africa 5.00 93 PI 271982 Somalia 5.00 94 PI 271983 Somalia 5.00 95 PI 271987 Somalia 5.00 96 PI 273479 Ethiopia 5.00 97 PI 299563 South Africa 5.00 98 PI 306367 Angola 5.00 99 PI 319212 Egypt 5.00 100 PI 378615 Zaire 5.00 101 PI 392291 Kenya 5.00 102 PI 482260 Zimbabwe 5.00 103 PI 482269 Zimbabwe 5.00 104 PI 490377 Mali 5.00 105 PI 490384 Mali 5.00 106 PI 494821 Zambia 5.00 107 PI 500305 Zambia 5.00 108 PI 500320 Zambia 5.00 109 PI 525095 Egypt 5.00 110 PI 542115 Botswana 5.00 111 PI 559992 Nigeria 5.00 z The rating system consisted of 1 = 0% to 19% of a plant canopy affected by powdery mildew, 2 = 20% to 39%, 3 = 40% to 59%, 4 = 60% to 79%, and 5 = 80% to 100% of canopy affected; 1 indicates ARS, Lane, Oklahoma crosses; 2 indicates proprietary line from Syngenta Seeds. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report 24:42-48 (2001) 45
Disease Severeity Rating Figure 1. Disease severity rating of 111 C. lanatus entries screened for powdery mildew resistance. Each dot represents the average disease rating for each of the 111 C. lanatus screened. The disease severity units are given on the left, which is an average of plant canopy ratings for each selection evaluated. The rating system consisted of 1 = 0% to 19% of a plant canopy affected by powdery mildew, 2 = 20% to 39%, 3 = 40% to 59%, 4 = 60% to 79%, and 5 = 80% to 100% of canopy affected. 5 4 3 2 1 5 0 15 10 25 20 35 30 45 40 55 50 65 60 75 70 85 80 115 110 105 100 95 90 Citrullus lanatus screened for powdery mildew resistance Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report 24:42-48 (2001) 46
- Page 5 and 6: this would be a welcome benefit to
- Page 7 and 8: Georgia, Statesboro, GA, “Evaluat
- Page 9 and 10: http://www.ashs.org/ashspress/ wate
- Page 11 and 12: Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Finan
- Page 13 and 14: Table 1. The composition of culture
- Page 15 and 16: Prezygotic barriers have previously
- Page 17 and 18: Cucumber Inbred Line USDA 6632E Jac
- Page 19 and 20: Multiple Shoot Induction from the S
- Page 21 and 22: Table 3. Effects of combinations of
- Page 23 and 24: concentration of NAA (0.1 mg/l) wit
- Page 25 and 26: eplicate. Shoot differentiation and
- Page 27 and 28: Table 2. Shoot induction efficiency
- Page 29 and 30: Figure 1. The viability of Cucumis
- Page 31 and 32: Gynogenesis in a Dihaploid Line of
- Page 33 and 34: Resistant Blister Reaction to Powde
- Page 35 and 36: Table 1. Analysis of variance for p
- Page 37 and 38: Fusarium Wilt Resistance in Eight I
- Page 39 and 40: aised PM seedlings and plants, alth
- Page 41 and 42: Table 1. F2 single factor segregati
- Page 43 and 44: of the loci (e.g., M7675, U13831, A
- Page 45 and 46: Table 1. Percentage of RAPD band pr
- Page 47 and 48: Inodorus Primer Casaba Honeydew Cha
- Page 49 and 50: Frequency of RAPD Polymorphisms in
- Page 51 and 52: BC551 76.6 92.9 38.5 20.5 38.9 42.2
- Page 53 and 54: Powdery Mildew: An Emerging Disease
- Page 55: Table 1 (continued).z Cultivar Coun
- Page 59 and 60: In the present study C. lanatus ent
- Page 61 and 62: Lakes, NJ) was a 0.5 cc (50 unit) s
- Page 63 and 64: Characterization of a New Male Ster
- Page 65 and 66: Table 1. Progeny test of male steri
- Page 67 and 68: Progeny Diploid Year Season generat
- Page 69 and 70: elatively small during its developm
- Page 71 and 72: content had no significant effect o
- Page 73 and 74: Stars-N-Stripes 26.3 12.0 35 8.5 5.
- Page 75 and 76: 11. Mozumder, B.K.G, N.E. Caroselli
- Page 77 and 78: Table 1. Vine length of watermelon
- Page 79 and 80: Survey of Watermelon Trialing Metho
- Page 81 and 82: assigned to adjacent plots (Table 2
- Page 83 and 84: Variation among tropical pumpkin cu
- Page 85 and 86: Table 1. Aggressiveness of powdery
- Page 87 and 88: A large variability of aggressivene
- Page 89 and 90: Table 1: Observed reaction of melon
- Page 91 and 92: Same Gene for Bush Growth Habit in
- Page 93 and 94: Relationship between Fruit Shape an
- Page 95 and 96: Table 3. Seed yield per fruit and s
- Page 97 and 98: The four cultivar-groups differed m
- Page 99 and 100: Lee et al. (17) developed a RAPD ma
- Page 101 and 102: 19. Lelley, T and S. Henglmüller,
- Page 103 and 104: Those primers that had strong bands
- Page 105 and 106: Genetic Variability in Pumpkin (Cuc
Disease Severeity Rating<br />
Figure 1. Disease severity rating of 111 C. lanatus entries screened for powdery mildew resistance. Each dot<br />
represents the average disease rating for each of the 111 C. lanatus screened. The disease severity units are<br />
given on the left, which is an average of plant canopy ratings for each selection evaluated. The rating system<br />
consisted of 1 = 0% <strong>to</strong> 19% of a plant canopy affected by powdery mildew, 2 = 20% <strong>to</strong> 39%, 3 = 40% <strong>to</strong> 59%, 4<br />
= 60% <strong>to</strong> 79%, and 5 = 80% <strong>to</strong> 100% of canopy affected.<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
5<br />
0<br />
15<br />
10<br />
25<br />
20<br />
<strong>35</strong><br />
30<br />
45<br />
40<br />
55<br />
50<br />
65<br />
60<br />
75<br />
70<br />
85<br />
80<br />
115<br />
110<br />
105<br />
100<br />
95<br />
90<br />
Citrullus lanatus screened for powdery mildew resistance<br />
<strong>Cucurbit</strong> Genetics Cooperative Report 24:42-48 (2001)<br />
46
Change language