Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2009 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE
Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2009 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2009 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE
5/8 Figure 9: polyester/glass fiber encapsulation of DSC Figure 10: UV absorption of polyester Figure 11: Transmission of glass and polyester encapsulation materials Task 19. Mechanical integrity analysis of flexible a-Si:H PV devices The objective of this task is to determine the critical factors, which control the mechanical integrity of layered a-Si:H PV devices. The internal stress state in individual layers was determined from a thermo-mechanical analysis of the radius of curvature of films. The a-Si:H layer was found to be under a compressive strain of approx. 0.1-0.2%, which is favorable for the PV cell performance since the silicon layer is the most brittle layer. Cohesive and adhesive properties of the layers were investigated using fragmentation test method developed at LTC. The crack onset strain (COS) of the PV stack was found to be maximum for a force of 200 N applied during the a-Si:H deposition. The critical radius of curvature in terms of layer cracking was found to be close to 3 mm at room temperature. The influence of temperature was also investigated and found to be considerable as shown in Figure 12. A thermomechanical model was developed, including internal strain and elastic contrast contributions. 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.000 -0.002 COS = COS* – � i Intrinsic COS* (elastic contrast) PV/PEN; MD COS experimental COS theoretical Internal strain � i 0 50 100 150 200 Temperature [°C] Figure 12: Crack onset strain modelling of PV device versus temperature WP2. Process integration into ultralight sandwich composite structure (resp. LTC) Task 5. Optimization of bonding layer in symmetric sandwich structures The influence of adhesive quantity has been measured in 4-points bending. It has been observed that the compressive strength of the skin increases with adhesive weight even if no debonding occurs. The adhesive stabilizes the skin and reinforces the core, so that the wrinkling strength is increased. The influence of bonding defects was also studied by inserting 2 mm and 5 mm wide defects. The strength was decreased by 30% and 80%, respectively, as depicted in Figure 13. As failure was due to local buckling over the defect and debonding, the strength increased with adhesive weight. An analytical model was developed to calculate the strengthening effect of adhesive menisci observed in bending tests. The model reproduced in Figure 14 correlated very well with experimental data. It enabled the bending strength to be predicted by varying adhesive quantity, core thickness or carbon prepreg thickness. This demonstrated that the optimal adhesive weight for the selected materials was ~40 g/m 2 of adhesive per face. Task 6. Modeling of the influence of glue meniscus on bond strength in sandwich structures A model predicting the size of the resin meniscus as function of adhesive weight has been developed and validated. It has been used coupled with the measurements of adhesive toughness to calculate the skin / core debonding energy. It has been highlighted that the mechanisms involved for breaking adhesive meniscus dissipates much more energy than continuous crack propagation in adhesive. The effect of adhesive menisci on the failure in bending of sandwich beams with simulated defects (preliminary core / skin debonds) was modeled analytically. It was observed that the increased strength with adhesive weight was not due to an increase in debonding energy, but to the stabilizing effect of the menisci, which increased the compressive load in the skin causing buckling of the skin over the Ultralight Photovoltaic Structures, Y. Leterrier, EPFL 195/290
defect. In this task, the influence of process pressure on strenght of ultralight (< 1 kg/m 2 ) sandwich structures was also investigated and modeled, and the results depicted in Figure 15 show that the optimal pressure for such ultralight structure is not 1 bar as usually considered for classic vacuum bag processing, but it close to 0.5 bar. This important information was transfered to company Decision SA in charge of the manufacture of several components for Solar Impulse. Stress in 0° layer [MPa] 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 Smooth skin without defects Smooth skin with 2mm defects Smooth skin with 5mm defects 0 10 20 30 40 50 Adhesive quantity [g/m 2 ] Figure 13: Compressive stress in the skin at failure in 4-points bending tests as a function of adhesive weight and with and without bonding defects. Comp. load per unit width [N/mm] 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 Wrinkling load Core compression Core shear Local skin strain Experimental data 2 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Adhesive weight in menisci [g/m 2 Critical half-wavelength ] Figure 14: Compressive load in the skin at failure in 4-points bending test as a function of adhesive weight. The loads predicted for local instability coupled with local core or skin failure are displayed. Figure 15: influence of process pressure on strenght of ultralight sandwich structures Task 7. Development of asymmetric ultralight sandwich structures The strength of asymmetric sandwich structures with incorporated solar cells has been further studied. Sandwich samples with one carbon skin and one skin comprising one solar cell were produced with -0.3 and -0.9 bar relative process pressure (prototype shown in Figure 17). The sandwich beams were tested in 4 point bending with the cell in tension. The failure was due to the tensile failure of the cell. The stress at failure was slightly lower than during pure tensile tests (Figure 1). No significant differences were found between the two process pressures. The bonding of solar cells on honeycomb has been evaluated. The contact angle of adhesive on the silver backside of the cell was measured and was similar to that measured on cured carbon prepreg. The measurement of the debonding energy using cantilever beam method was particularly difficult due to the brittleness of the cells. However, it was observed during solar skin debonding that honeycomb core tore with only 5 g/m 2 of adhesive, which showed thus a very high adhesion of the adhesive on the silver-coated backside of the solar cells. Task 8. Production of prototype modules Several novel demonstrators were produced, some of which are shown in Figures 16-19. LPI made a complete encapsulated flexible module (Figure 16) consisting of 11 cells. A curved asymmetric c-Sihoneycomb-carbon fiber composite ultralight sandwich structure (800 g/m 2 ) was also at LTC (Figure 17). This structure with 1 skin made of c-Si cells showed balanced mechanical performance (stiffness and strength) and is unique. A new structural element has also been developed by CCLab (Figure 18). This is a multifunctional sandwich panel made of glass polyester skins and polyurethane foam core. Solar cells have been encapsulated on one skin. It is expected that this new structural element can be implemented in building applications to serve the needs for structural integrity, energy production, and thermal insulation of the building. The new structural element would also be modeled by CCLab to simulate its behavior. Ultralight Photovoltaic Structures, Y. Leterrier, EPFL 196/290 6 5 4 3 Critical half-wavelength [mm] 6/8
- Page 147 and 148: Evaluation 2008 and Outlook 2009 L'
- Page 149 and 150: Project Goals NAPOLYDE industrials
- Page 151 and 152: � Organic large solar panel and
- Page 153 and 154: Materials such as the conductive ca
- Page 155 and 156: National and international collabor
- Page 157 and 158: Project Goals The aim of FULLSPECTR
- Page 159 and 160: In addition, every two years, the P
- Page 161 and 162: The table below show the change of
- Page 163 and 164: The table below shows the change of
- Page 165 and 166: 4. The UV-A tests with PMMA films c
- Page 167 and 168: Introduction / Project Goals The co
- Page 169 and 170: Fig. 4. Schematic illustration of a
- Page 172 and 173: THINPV Eidgenössisches Departement
- Page 174 and 175: 3/6 IR laser source Pumping line IR
- Page 176 and 177: 5/6 Figure 2: Scheme of a monolithi
- Page 178 and 179: PECNET Eidgenössisches Departement
- Page 180 and 181: 3/10 Projektziele Dieses Forschungs
- Page 182 and 183: 5/10 und mit Stichworten katalogisi
- Page 184 and 185: 7/10 einer Vorverpflichtung mit rel
- Page 186 and 187: 9/10 NanoPEC Partner IEA HIA Annex
- Page 188: Module und Gebäudeintegration T. S
- Page 191 and 192: Einleitung / Projektziele Obwohl be
- Page 194 and 195: ULTRALIGHT PHOTOVOLTAIC STRUCTURES
- Page 196 and 197: 3/8 Task 2. Encapsulation of Si-bas
- Page 200 and 201: 7/8 Figure 16: Flexible DSCmodule F
- Page 202: Systemtechnik D. Chianese, N. Cereg
- Page 205 and 206: Aim of the project The aim of the
- Page 207 and 208: The short circuit current of each P
- Page 209 and 210: TEST cycle 11 In 2008 a new 15 mont
- Page 211 and 212: Evaluation 2008 and prospects for 2
- Page 213 and 214: 1. Traceable performance measuremen
- Page 215 and 216: formed with two standard halogen la
- Page 217 and 218: 3. Modelling and analysis (SP4) 3.1
- Page 219 and 220: Figure 3 shows a summary of the RR
- Page 221 and 222: Projektziele für 2008 � Fortfüh
- Page 223 and 224: Interessant ist die Beobachtung, da
- Page 225 and 226: Wechselrichtertests Im Bereich der
- Page 227 and 228: Stress limits for bypass diodes for
- Page 229 and 230: Objectives SoS-PV (Security of Supp
- Page 231 and 232: Finally, strategies for demand side
- Page 233 and 234: ~ Mains terminal Synchronisation &
- Page 235 and 236: International collaboration SoS-PVi
- Page 238 and 239: Eidgenössisches Departement für U
- Page 240 and 241: The cumulative installed PV power i
- Page 242: 5/5 Workshops Grid Parity & Beyond
- Page 245 and 246: Einleitung / Projektziele Die Ziele
- Page 247 and 248: Dank der Projektdatenbank vom Task
5/8<br />
Figure 9: polyester/glass fiber<br />
encapsulation of DSC<br />
Figure 10: UV absorption of<br />
polyester<br />
Figure 11: Transmission of glass<br />
and polyester encapsulation<br />
materials<br />
Task 19. Mechanical integrity analysis of flexible a-Si:H PV devices<br />
The objective of this task is to determine the critical factors, which control the mechanical integrity of<br />
layered a-Si:H PV devices. The internal stress state in individual layers was determined from a<br />
thermo-mechanical analysis of the radius of curvature of films. The a-Si:H layer was found to be under<br />
a compressive strain of approx. 0.1-0.2%, which is favorable for the PV cell performance since the<br />
silicon layer is the most brittle layer. Cohesive and adhesive properties of the layers were investigated<br />
using fragmentation test method developed at LTC. The crack onset strain (COS) of the PV stack was<br />
found to be maximum for a force of 200 N applied during the a-Si:H deposition. The critical radius of<br />
curvature in terms of layer cracking was found to be close to 3 mm at room temperature. The influence<br />
of temperature was also investigated and found to be considerable as shown in Figure 12. A thermomechanical<br />
model was developed, including internal strain and elastic contrast contributions.<br />
0.014<br />
0.012<br />
0.010<br />
0.008<br />
0.006<br />
0.004<br />
0.002<br />
0.000<br />
-0.002<br />
COS = COS* – � i<br />
Intrinsic COS*<br />
(elastic contrast)<br />
PV/PEN; MD<br />
COS experimental<br />
COS theoretical<br />
Internal strain � i<br />
0 50 100 150 200<br />
Temperature [°C]<br />
Figure 12: Crack onset strain modelling of PV device versus temperature<br />
WP2. Process integration into ultralight sandwich composite structure (resp. LTC)<br />
Task 5. Optimization of bonding layer in symmetric sandwich structures<br />
The influence of adhesive quantity has been measured in 4-points bending. It has been observed that<br />
the compressive strength of the skin increases with adhesive weight even if no debonding occurs. The<br />
adhesive stabilizes the skin and reinforces the core, so that the wrinkling strength is increased. The<br />
influence of bonding defects was also studied by inserting 2 mm and 5 mm wide defects. The strength<br />
was decreased by 30% and 80%, respectively, as depicted in Figure 13. As failure was due to local<br />
buckling over the defect and debonding, the strength increased with adhesive weight. An analytical<br />
model was developed to calculate the strengthening effect of adhesive menisci observed in bending<br />
tests. The model reproduced in Figure 14 correlated very well with experimental data. It enabled the<br />
bending strength to be predicted by varying adhesive quantity, core thickness or carbon prepreg thickness.<br />
This demonstrated that the optimal adhesive weight for the selected materials was ~40 g/m 2 of<br />
adhesive per face.<br />
Task 6. Modeling of the influence of glue meniscus on bond strength in sandwich structures<br />
A model predicting the size of the resin meniscus as function of adhesive weight has been developed<br />
and validated. It has been used coupled with the measurements of adhesive toughness to calculate<br />
the skin / core debonding energy. It has been highlighted that the mechanisms involved for breaking<br />
adhesive meniscus dissipates much more energy than continuous crack propagation in adhesive. The<br />
effect of adhesive menisci on the failure in bending of sandwich beams with simulated defects (preliminary<br />
core / skin debonds) was modeled analytically. It was observed that the increased strength<br />
with adhesive weight was not due to an increase in debonding energy, but to the stabilizing effect of<br />
the menisci, which increased the compressive load in the skin causing buckling of the skin over the<br />
Ultralight Photovoltaic Structures, Y. Leterrier, EPFL<br />
195/290