29.09.2012 Views

Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE

Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE

Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5/6<br />

The test methodology was optimized in order to have results as relevant as possible [2]. It was found<br />

that the edges of the wafers were paramount for the fracture stress, see Fig 6a where the effect of<br />

etching the edges (i.e. removing the cracks on the edges) is shown. In consequence, the test chosen<br />

was the ring-on-ring test, which stresses a large area in the center of the wafer but leaves the edges<br />

free of stress. Finally, the importance of the contact between the testing tool and the wafer was<br />

investigated, and it turned out that the use of carbon paper at the contacts helped improving the<br />

fracture strength measured, as it can be seen in Fig. 6b. An explanation comes from the fact that<br />

without carbon paper, the contact between the tool and the wafer is made on the hills present on the<br />

rough surface of the latter. This localized contact may induce stress concentrators and prevent the<br />

relative sliding of the two bodies needed for bending the wafer. This added stress will in turn diminish<br />

the fracture stress and introduce a random breaking.<br />

The influence of sawing parameter on fracture strength can be seen on Fig. 7, where the cut sawn<br />

with the coarsest abrasive is compared with the cut made with the thinnest abrasive.<br />

Probability of failure [%]<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Edges not etched<br />

Edges etched<br />

50 75 100 125 150 175<br />

Stress-to-Rupture [MPa]<br />

0<br />

100 200 300 400 500 600<br />

Stress-to-Rupture [MPa]<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Figure 6: Influence of the test methodology on the fracture strength distribution. a) Influence of edges<br />

defects. The wafers with the etched edges are stronger than the wafer without etched edges.<br />

b) Influence of carbon paper: without carbon paper, the fracture stress distribution is poorly fitted with<br />

a Weibull distribution and the mean fracture stress is lower than with carbon paper, where the fracture<br />

stress distribution is well fitted with a Weibull distribution [2].<br />

Probability of failure [%]<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Without carbon paper<br />

With carbon paper<br />

Figure 7: Yield stress distribution for two sets of wafers sawn with different conditions, in gray with<br />

the coarsest, in black with the finest abrasive. The other sawing parameters remain the same [1].<br />

SIWIS: Ultra Thin Silicon Wafer Sawing by Multi-Wire Sawing, A. Bidiville, Empa Seite 65 von 288

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!