Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE
Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE
Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5/6<br />
The test methodology was optimized in order to have results as relevant as possible [2]. It was found<br />
that the edges of the wafers were paramount for the fracture stress, see Fig 6a where the effect of<br />
etching the edges (i.e. removing the cracks on the edges) is shown. In consequence, the test chosen<br />
was the ring-on-ring test, which stresses a large area in the center of the wafer but leaves the edges<br />
free of stress. Finally, the importance of the contact between the testing tool and the wafer was<br />
investigated, and it turned out that the use of carbon paper at the contacts helped improving the<br />
fracture strength measured, as it can be seen in Fig. 6b. An explanation comes from the fact that<br />
without carbon paper, the contact between the tool and the wafer is made on the hills present on the<br />
rough surface of the latter. This localized contact may induce stress concentrators and prevent the<br />
relative sliding of the two bodies needed for bending the wafer. This added stress will in turn diminish<br />
the fracture stress and introduce a random breaking.<br />
The influence of sawing parameter on fracture strength can be seen on Fig. 7, where the cut sawn<br />
with the coarsest abrasive is compared with the cut made with the thinnest abrasive.<br />
Probability of failure [%]<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Edges not etched<br />
Edges etched<br />
50 75 100 125 150 175<br />
Stress-to-Rupture [MPa]<br />
0<br />
100 200 300 400 500 600<br />
Stress-to-Rupture [MPa]<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
Figure 6: Influence of the test methodology on the fracture strength distribution. a) Influence of edges<br />
defects. The wafers with the etched edges are stronger than the wafer without etched edges.<br />
b) Influence of carbon paper: without carbon paper, the fracture stress distribution is poorly fitted with<br />
a Weibull distribution and the mean fracture stress is lower than with carbon paper, where the fracture<br />
stress distribution is well fitted with a Weibull distribution [2].<br />
Probability of failure [%]<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
Without carbon paper<br />
With carbon paper<br />
Figure 7: Yield stress distribution for two sets of wafers sawn with different conditions, in gray with<br />
the coarsest, in black with the finest abrasive. The other sawing parameters remain the same [1].<br />
SIWIS: Ultra Thin Silicon Wafer Sawing by Multi-Wire Sawing, A. Bidiville, Empa Seite 65 von 288