Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE
Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE
Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3/6<br />
Results<br />
Defects characterization<br />
The depth of the defects present under the surface of the wafers was measured. This was done by<br />
polishing a wafer sample with a slight angle in respect to its surface and observing this polished surface<br />
by optical microscopy. The depth of each crack was measured in order to have a crack depth distribution.<br />
This procedure was done for different chosen sets of sawing parameters to quantify the sawing<br />
quality with respect to the sawing parameters. The so obtained distribution can be fitted to an<br />
exponential distribution in the form of p(d)=Ae -bd , where d is the depth of the crack, A is a preexponential<br />
parameter and 1/b is the crack characteristic depth. This last parameter determines the<br />
diminishing rate of crack density in function of depth and allows the comparison between different<br />
cracks depth distributions. An example of such measurement is given in Fig. 2 [1].<br />
Figure 2: Crack depth distribution for the wafers cut with the smallest abrasive. The plain exponential<br />
curve is fitting the measured distribution quite well. As a comparison the dashed curve represents the<br />
fitted distribution of the wafers cut with the coarsest abrasive [1].<br />
The quality of a cut is defined here by the quantity of cracks, particularly the deepest ones, because<br />
they have the biggest influence on yield stress. Thus, a cut with a lot of defects near the surface but<br />
fewer defects further deep than another cut will be said to be of better quality than the second one.<br />
The crack depth distribution depends on the position of measurement. Actually, a measurement made<br />
near the exit of the wire will be of better quality than a cut made near the entrance. Furthermore, the<br />
direction on which the cracks depth measurement is done also have an influence. If it is made in a<br />
direction parallel to the wire movement, the results will be worst than if the measurement is made perpendicular<br />
to it. The parameter having the strongest influence on crack depth is the abrasive grit size,<br />
but the other parameters studied also have an impact.<br />
Roughness measurements<br />
It has been observed that the direction of roughness measurement has a negligible influence on the<br />
results. Thus the analysed measurements were taken perpendicular to the wire direction, as for the<br />
crack depth distribution measurement.<br />
As for the cracks depth, the influence of sawing conditions can clearly be seen on Figure 3, with the<br />
same tendencies than for the crack depth distribution. The average roughness parameter Ra is ranging<br />
from 0.3 to 1.7 µm, which means that for the worst cut, the roughness represents more than 1 % of<br />
the total thickness of the wafer.<br />
SIWIS: Ultra Thin Silicon Wafer Sawing by Multi-Wire Sawing, A. Bidiville, Empa Seite 63 von 288