29.09.2012 Views

Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE

Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE

Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3/6<br />

Results<br />

Defects characterization<br />

The depth of the defects present under the surface of the wafers was measured. This was done by<br />

polishing a wafer sample with a slight angle in respect to its surface and observing this polished surface<br />

by optical microscopy. The depth of each crack was measured in order to have a crack depth distribution.<br />

This procedure was done for different chosen sets of sawing parameters to quantify the sawing<br />

quality with respect to the sawing parameters. The so obtained distribution can be fitted to an<br />

exponential distribution in the form of p(d)=Ae -bd , where d is the depth of the crack, A is a preexponential<br />

parameter and 1/b is the crack characteristic depth. This last parameter determines the<br />

diminishing rate of crack density in function of depth and allows the comparison between different<br />

cracks depth distributions. An example of such measurement is given in Fig. 2 [1].<br />

Figure 2: Crack depth distribution for the wafers cut with the smallest abrasive. The plain exponential<br />

curve is fitting the measured distribution quite well. As a comparison the dashed curve represents the<br />

fitted distribution of the wafers cut with the coarsest abrasive [1].<br />

The quality of a cut is defined here by the quantity of cracks, particularly the deepest ones, because<br />

they have the biggest influence on yield stress. Thus, a cut with a lot of defects near the surface but<br />

fewer defects further deep than another cut will be said to be of better quality than the second one.<br />

The crack depth distribution depends on the position of measurement. Actually, a measurement made<br />

near the exit of the wire will be of better quality than a cut made near the entrance. Furthermore, the<br />

direction on which the cracks depth measurement is done also have an influence. If it is made in a<br />

direction parallel to the wire movement, the results will be worst than if the measurement is made perpendicular<br />

to it. The parameter having the strongest influence on crack depth is the abrasive grit size,<br />

but the other parameters studied also have an impact.<br />

Roughness measurements<br />

It has been observed that the direction of roughness measurement has a negligible influence on the<br />

results. Thus the analysed measurements were taken perpendicular to the wire direction, as for the<br />

crack depth distribution measurement.<br />

As for the cracks depth, the influence of sawing conditions can clearly be seen on Figure 3, with the<br />

same tendencies than for the crack depth distribution. The average roughness parameter Ra is ranging<br />

from 0.3 to 1.7 µm, which means that for the worst cut, the roughness represents more than 1 % of<br />

the total thickness of the wafer.<br />

SIWIS: Ultra Thin Silicon Wafer Sawing by Multi-Wire Sawing, A. Bidiville, Empa Seite 63 von 288

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!