29.09.2012 Views

Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE

Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE

Programm Photovoltaik Ausgabe 2008 ... - Bundesamt für Energie BFE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7/9<br />

PBDVA<br />

temp<br />

[°C]<br />

100<br />

200<br />

250<br />

Buffer<br />

thickness<br />

[nm]<br />

�<br />

[%]<br />

FF<br />

[%]<br />

Voc<br />

[mV]<br />

Jsc<br />

30 11.7 67.9 623 27.7<br />

CdS-ref. 13.9 72 633 30.5<br />

60 10.1 58.7 633 27.4<br />

CdS-ref. 13.5 73.4 655 27.9<br />

30 11.3 65.4 587 29.5<br />

CdS-ref. 12.4 68.5 618 29.4<br />

60 8.3 55.3 504 29.7<br />

CdS-ref. 13.9 74.1 657 28.6<br />

30 1.4 26.6 247 20.1<br />

CdS-ref. 14.2 74.4 688 28.5<br />

60 4.1 33.5 487 25.4<br />

CdS-ref. 14.2 72.7 685 28.5<br />

[mA/cm 2 ]<br />

Table II: The PV parameters of cells with PBDVA treatment for 10 min at different temperature and<br />

their respective CDB-CdS reference cells.<br />

The buffer layers of ~30 nm and ~60 nm thicknesses were grown on a common absorber obtained<br />

from the same run and no PBDVA treatment was applied. The as-grown cells, with ~30 nm thin buffer<br />

layer yielded an efficiency of 12.1% and with ~60 nm thin buffer produced an efficiency of 12.3%. The<br />

cells were air annealed for 20 min at 200°C resulting in a drop in efficiencies from 12.1% to 10.4% and<br />

from 12.3% to 8.5% for cells with ~30 nm and ~60 nm thin buffer layers, respectively (Table III). But<br />

occasionally efficiency improvement was also measured, which suggests some inconsistencies.<br />

Currently, we are investigating the reasons behind these inconstancies.<br />

A highly efficient cell of 14.1% was realized by depositing ~60 nm thick buffer layer without any<br />

PBDVA treatment. Figure 8 shows the J-V characteristic of such a solar cell. This superior<br />

performance of the cell is attributed to the formation of a high quality buffer layer having lower<br />

stoichiometric disorder and good interface between CIGS-InxSy by diffusion due to chemical potential<br />

difference. However, the efficiency dropped to 13.2% as cell was air annealed at 200°C for 5 min.<br />

Cell<br />

Buffer<br />

thickness<br />

[nm]<br />

�<br />

[%]<br />

FF<br />

[%]<br />

Voc<br />

[mV]<br />

Jsc<br />

As-grown<br />

Air annealed<br />

~30<br />

12.1<br />

10.4<br />

65.9<br />

59.4<br />

631<br />

575<br />

29.1<br />

30.4<br />

As-grown<br />

Air annealed<br />

~60<br />

12.3<br />

8.5<br />

64.9<br />

53.7<br />

666<br />

531<br />

28.3<br />

28.7<br />

CdS-ref. 14.7 75.6 688 28.3<br />

[mA/cm 2 ]<br />

Table III: The PV properties of the cells with ~30 nm and ~60 nm thin InxSy buffer layers grown on a<br />

common absorber. The completed cells were annealed in air for 20 min at 200°C. No PBDVA<br />

treatment was applied.<br />

ATHLET, D. Brémaud, ETH Zurich Seite 101 von 288

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!