Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ...
Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ... Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ...
Mitigation and Monitoring would be defined as a square that circumscribes this circle. As a result of brushy vegetation, water, or other conditions, the fatality area around the turbines may not be entirely searchable. To adjust for carcasses that may not be found because of this potential bias, those areas that cannot be searched would be measured via GPS. The estimate of birds or bats that may have actually been present within the unsearchable areas would be extrapolated from the numbers of fatalities found in the searchable area. 5.2.1.5 Calculation of Adjusted Fatality Estimates Using searcher efficiency, carcass removal, and searchable area estimates determined empirically, an overall estimate of bird and bat fatalities would be calculated. The resulting estimates would be larger than the numbers of carcasses found for both birds and bats. 5.2.1.6 Survey Report After the completion of each annual fatality survey a report of findings would be prepared. A summary of the results of the fatality searches would include recorded data for each carcass found, including the variables described above. Results of the carcass removal and searcher efficiency studies would also be presented. An estimated fatality rate would be calculated as presented above. A discussion of the species of carcasses discovered during the fatality search would also be presented. Recommendations for any modifications to subsequent postconstruction avian and bat fatality studies at the project site would also be presented. This report would be distributed to interested stakeholders including USFWS and VDGIF. 5.2.2 Facility Threatened and Endangered Species Monitoring To monitor the potential cumulative effects of its actions on threatened or endangered species, NASA, in cooperation with USFWS, has developed a protected species monitoring plan for Wallops Island (NASA, 2010c). NASA would implement this plan in spring 2010. NASA will continue to coordinate with CNWR and USDA personnel in monitoring the Wallops Island beach for Piping Plover and Red Knot activity. These personnel routinely monitor Assateague, Wallops Island, Assawoman, and Metompkin Island beaches for Piping Plovers during nesting season. Red Knots would be expected to be present in areas suitable for Piping Plover nesting during similar times of year. Any Piping Plover nests discovered would be appropriately marked using a Global Positioning System (GPS) unit, identified with signage, and closed to personnel or visitor access. FAA lighting requirements on the turbines would be satisfied with flashing lights rather than steady-burning lights, as studies indicate that flashing lights result in significantly fewer avian fatalities. An annual summary report of the monitoring results and events will be distributed to interested stakeholders including USFWS and VDGIF. 5.3 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Adaptive management is a tool to help agencies and organizations make better decisions in a context of uncertainty as more information becomes available. Adaptive management utilizes ongoing, data collection and analysis to assess and if necessary, to modify existing processes. For the Alternative Energy Project, NASA based its assessment of risks to birds and bats on preconstruction data. This methodology carries inherent uncertainties, and as such adjustments to this monitoring protocol may be made as deemed necessary. For example, NASA may consider 152
Mitigation and Monitoring adding additional study years, changing duration of the study, or modifying the frequency of searches. Before modifying the study plan, NASA would consult with interested stakeholders including USFWS and VDGIF. Similarly, considerable uncertainty exists regarding the effectiveness of various wind turbine mitigation strategies in reducing impacts on birds and bats. Based upon results of monitoring and the technological maturity of future mitigation strategies, NASA may consider implementing, augmenting, or replacing these technologies as circumstances warrant. NASA would consult with interested stakeholders including USFWS and VDGIF prior to implementing or modifying mitigation measures. 153
- Page 125 and 126: Environmental Consequences Based on
- Page 127 and 128: Environmental Consequences Table 22
- Page 129 and 130: Environmental Consequences Based on
- Page 131 and 132: Alternative One Environmental Conse
- Page 133 and 134: Environmental Consequences conceiva
- Page 135 and 136: Environmental Consequences wetland
- Page 137 and 138: Environmental Consequences of magni
- Page 139 and 140: Environmental Consequences is the a
- Page 141 and 142: Environmental Consequences (TREC).
- Page 143 and 144: Environmental Consequences why bats
- Page 145 and 146: Environmental Consequences determin
- Page 147 and 148: Environmental Consequences While a
- Page 149 and 150: Gull-Billed Tern Environmental Cons
- Page 151 and 152: Environmental Consequences In addit
- Page 153 and 154: Environmental Consequences staff. T
- Page 155 and 156: Proposed Action Aboveground Resourc
- Page 157 and 158: Alternative One Aboveground Resourc
- Page 159 and 160: 4.4.4 Transportation No Action Alte
- Page 162 and 163: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 164 and 165: Environmental Consequences site tha
- Page 166 and 167: Environmental Consequences 2) Placi
- Page 168 and 169: Environmental Consequences projects
- Page 170 and 171: Environmental Consequences Although
- Page 172 and 173: 4.6 PERMITS, LICENSES, AND APPROVAL
- Page 174 and 175: Mitigation and Monitoring 5.2.1 Pos
- Page 178 and 179: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 180 and 181: Agencies, Organizations, and Person
- Page 182 and 183: NASA WFF Technical Library Building
- Page 184 and 185: Name Organization Other Organizatio
- Page 186 and 187: References Cohen, J.B., S. Karpanty
- Page 188 and 189: References Kunz, T.H., E.B. Arnett,
- Page 190 and 191: References Richardson, D.L. 1992. H
- Page 192 and 193: References USFWS. 2009c. Northeaste
Mitig<strong>at</strong>ion and Monitoring<br />
would be defined as a square th<strong>at</strong> circumscribes this circle. As a result of brushy veget<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />
w<strong>at</strong>er, or other conditions, the f<strong>at</strong>ality area around the turbines may not be entirely searchable.<br />
To adjust for carcasses th<strong>at</strong> may not be found because of this potential bias, those areas th<strong>at</strong><br />
cannot be searched would be measured via GPS. The estim<strong>at</strong>e of birds or b<strong>at</strong>s th<strong>at</strong> may have<br />
actually been present within the unsearchable areas would be extrapol<strong>at</strong>ed from the numbers of<br />
f<strong>at</strong>alities found in the searchable area.<br />
5.2.1.5 Calcul<strong>at</strong>ion of Adjusted F<strong>at</strong>ality Estim<strong>at</strong>es<br />
Using searcher efficiency, carcass removal, and searchable area estim<strong>at</strong>es determined<br />
empirically, an overall estim<strong>at</strong>e of bird and b<strong>at</strong> f<strong>at</strong>alities would be calcul<strong>at</strong>ed. The resulting<br />
estim<strong>at</strong>es would be larger than the numbers of carcasses found for both birds and b<strong>at</strong>s.<br />
5.2.1.6 Survey Report<br />
After the completion of each annual f<strong>at</strong>ality survey a report of findings would be prepared. A<br />
summary of the results of the f<strong>at</strong>ality searches would include recorded d<strong>at</strong>a for each carcass<br />
found, including the variables described above. Results of the carcass removal and searcher<br />
efficiency studies would also be presented. An estim<strong>at</strong>ed f<strong>at</strong>ality r<strong>at</strong>e would be calcul<strong>at</strong>ed as<br />
presented above. A discussion of the species of carcasses discovered during the f<strong>at</strong>ality search<br />
would also be presented. Recommend<strong>at</strong>ions for any modific<strong>at</strong>ions to subsequent postconstruction<br />
avian and b<strong>at</strong> f<strong>at</strong>ality studies <strong>at</strong> the project site would also be presented. This report<br />
would be distributed to interested stakeholders including USFWS and VDGIF.<br />
5.2.2 Facility Thre<strong>at</strong>ened and Endangered Species Monitoring<br />
To monitor the potential cumul<strong>at</strong>ive effects of its actions on thre<strong>at</strong>ened or endangered species,<br />
<strong>NASA</strong>, in cooper<strong>at</strong>ion with USFWS, has developed a protected species monitoring plan for<br />
<strong>Wallops</strong> Island (<strong>NASA</strong>, 2010c). <strong>NASA</strong> would implement this plan in spring 2010. <strong>NASA</strong> will<br />
continue to coordin<strong>at</strong>e with CNWR and USDA personnel in monitoring the <strong>Wallops</strong> Island<br />
beach for Piping Plover and Red Knot activity. These personnel routinely monitor Ass<strong>at</strong>eague,<br />
<strong>Wallops</strong> Island, Assawoman, and Metompkin Island beaches for Piping Plovers during nesting<br />
season. Red Knots would be expected to be present in areas suitable for Piping Plover nesting<br />
during similar times of year. Any Piping Plover nests discovered would be appropri<strong>at</strong>ely marked<br />
using a Global Positioning System (GPS) unit, identified with signage, and closed to personnel<br />
or visitor access. FAA lighting requirements on the turbines would be s<strong>at</strong>isfied with flashing<br />
lights r<strong>at</strong>her than steady-burning lights, as studies indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> flashing lights result in<br />
significantly fewer avian f<strong>at</strong>alities. An annual summary report of the monitoring results and<br />
events will be distributed to interested stakeholders including USFWS and VDGIF.<br />
5.3 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT<br />
Adaptive management is a tool to help agencies and organiz<strong>at</strong>ions make better decisions in a<br />
context of uncertainty as more inform<strong>at</strong>ion becomes available. Adaptive management utilizes<br />
ongoing, d<strong>at</strong>a collection and analysis to assess and if necessary, to modify existing processes.<br />
For the <strong>Altern<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> Project, <strong>NASA</strong> based its assessment of risks to birds and b<strong>at</strong>s on<br />
preconstruction d<strong>at</strong>a. This methodology carries inherent uncertainties, and as such adjustments to<br />
this monitoring protocol may be made as deemed necessary. For example, <strong>NASA</strong> may consider<br />
152