Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ...
Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ... Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ...
This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Consequences 138
Environmental Consequences Photograph 6: Viewshed from a vantage point located approximately 3.7 kilometers (2.3 miles) southwest of the bridge that links Wallops Mainland to Wallops Island looking northeast toward the bridge. The simulated wind turbines in photographs 1, 2, and 3 of Appendix F are barely visible; therefore, the wind turbines would not result in a substantial change to the viewshed from recreational areas along Chincoteague Island, Assateague Island, and Watts Bay Subdivision, respectively. As shown by the simulation of photographs 4 and 5 in Appendix F, the wind turbines would be visible from the closest residential community, Mount Wharton subdivision, and from Arbuckle Neck Road (see Photograph 6 above). As shown in all the simulated photographs, the landscape surrounding the proposed turbine site already contains radio towers, the U.S. Navy V-10/V-20 Complex, and the bridge that links Wallops Mainland with Wallops Island. The turbines would be painted white so that they would blend well with the sky to reduce visual impacts. Because of the height of the turbines (approximately 120 meters [395 feet] at the top of the blade), it is not possible to site them in a location or manner completely invisible to the public and WFF workers and visitors. Aesthetics is highly subjective and dependent on people’s perceptions of whether the wind turbines are a negative or positive impact on the landscape. NASA would provide educational information via newsletters and public announcements (including the availability of this Draft EA) to the surrounding communities regarding the benefits of the wind turbines. In addition, the wind turbines could potentially become a popular public attraction, which is what happened at the ACUA wind farm. Although the ACUA wind farm is at an industrial facility and therefore not open to the public, ACUA established a public viewing area and a frequently visited Web 139
- Page 111 and 112: Affected Environment Photograph 2:
- Page 114 and 115: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 116 and 117: Proposed Action Environmental Conse
- Page 118 and 119: Environmental Consequences The inst
- Page 120 and 121: Alternative Two Environmental Conse
- Page 122: Environmental Consequences The func
- Page 125 and 126: Environmental Consequences Based on
- Page 127 and 128: Environmental Consequences Table 22
- Page 129 and 130: Environmental Consequences Based on
- Page 131 and 132: Alternative One Environmental Conse
- Page 133 and 134: Environmental Consequences conceiva
- Page 135 and 136: Environmental Consequences wetland
- Page 137 and 138: Environmental Consequences of magni
- Page 139 and 140: Environmental Consequences is the a
- Page 141 and 142: Environmental Consequences (TREC).
- Page 143 and 144: Environmental Consequences why bats
- Page 145 and 146: Environmental Consequences determin
- Page 147 and 148: Environmental Consequences While a
- Page 149 and 150: Gull-Billed Tern Environmental Cons
- Page 151 and 152: Environmental Consequences In addit
- Page 153 and 154: Environmental Consequences staff. T
- Page 155 and 156: Proposed Action Aboveground Resourc
- Page 157 and 158: Alternative One Aboveground Resourc
- Page 159 and 160: 4.4.4 Transportation No Action Alte
- Page 164 and 165: Environmental Consequences site tha
- Page 166 and 167: Environmental Consequences 2) Placi
- Page 168 and 169: Environmental Consequences projects
- Page 170 and 171: Environmental Consequences Although
- Page 172 and 173: 4.6 PERMITS, LICENSES, AND APPROVAL
- Page 174 and 175: Mitigation and Monitoring 5.2.1 Pos
- Page 176 and 177: Mitigation and Monitoring would be
- Page 178 and 179: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 180 and 181: Agencies, Organizations, and Person
- Page 182 and 183: NASA WFF Technical Library Building
- Page 184 and 185: Name Organization Other Organizatio
- Page 186 and 187: References Cohen, J.B., S. Karpanty
- Page 188 and 189: References Kunz, T.H., E.B. Arnett,
- Page 190 and 191: References Richardson, D.L. 1992. H
- Page 192 and 193: References USFWS. 2009c. Northeaste
Environmental Consequences<br />
Photograph 6: Viewshed from a vantage point loc<strong>at</strong>ed approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 3.7 kilometers (2.3 miles)<br />
southwest of the bridge th<strong>at</strong> links <strong>Wallops</strong> Mainland to <strong>Wallops</strong> Island looking northeast toward<br />
the bridge.<br />
The simul<strong>at</strong>ed wind turbines in photographs 1, 2, and 3 of Appendix F are barely visible;<br />
therefore, the wind turbines would not result in a substantial change to the viewshed from<br />
recre<strong>at</strong>ional areas along Chincoteague Island, Ass<strong>at</strong>eague Island, and W<strong>at</strong>ts Bay Subdivision,<br />
respectively. As shown by the simul<strong>at</strong>ion of photographs 4 and 5 in Appendix F, the wind<br />
turbines would be visible from the closest residential community, Mount Wharton subdivision,<br />
and from Arbuckle Neck Road (see Photograph 6 above).<br />
As shown in all the simul<strong>at</strong>ed photographs, the landscape surrounding the proposed turbine site<br />
already contains radio towers, the U.S. Navy V-10/V-20 Complex, and the bridge th<strong>at</strong> links<br />
<strong>Wallops</strong> Mainland with <strong>Wallops</strong> Island. The turbines would be painted white so th<strong>at</strong> they would<br />
blend well with the sky to reduce visual impacts. Because of the height of the turbines<br />
(approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 120 meters [395 feet] <strong>at</strong> the top of the blade), it is not possible to site them in a<br />
loc<strong>at</strong>ion or manner completely invisible to the public and WFF workers and visitors.<br />
Aesthetics is highly subjective and dependent on people’s perceptions of whether the wind<br />
turbines are a neg<strong>at</strong>ive or positive impact on the landscape. <strong>NASA</strong> would provide educ<strong>at</strong>ional<br />
inform<strong>at</strong>ion via newsletters and public announcements (including the availability of this <strong>Draft</strong><br />
<strong>EA</strong>) to the surrounding communities regarding the benefits of the wind turbines. In addition, the<br />
wind turbines could potentially become a popular public <strong>at</strong>traction, which is wh<strong>at</strong> happened <strong>at</strong><br />
the ACUA wind farm. Although the ACUA wind farm is <strong>at</strong> an industrial facility and therefore<br />
not open to the public, ACUA established a public viewing area and a frequently visited Web<br />
139