Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ...

Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ... Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ...

sites.wff.nasa.gov
from sites.wff.nasa.gov More from this publisher
25.03.2013 Views

Environmental Consequences necessary width for the access roads to the utility-scale wind turbines. Although records exist for the Migrant Loggerhead Shrike in Accomack County, Virginia, field identification to subspecies is rarely reported. Therefore, records for Migrant Loggerhead Shrike in Accomack County are likely to be Loggerhead Shrike, and Migrant Loggerhead Shrike is not likely to occur within the action area. The Proposed Action may result in minor adverse impacts on the species since Shrikes may utilize marsh and marsh-edge habitat. Delmarva Fox Squirrel No effects are anticipated to the Delmarva fox squirrel because the site of the Proposed Action lacks essential habitat elements for the species. Their preferred habitat is old growth loblolly pine forests; deep, deciduous swamps; or backwoods adjacent to pine woods. The Proposed Action is anticipated to have no effect on the Delmarva fox squirrel. Rafinesque’s Eastern Big-Eared Bat The utility-scale wind turbines and access roads would be constructed within potentially suitable habitat for this species. In addition, bat mortality has been documented as an adverse effect of bats colliding with the rotating blades of wind turbines. However, Rafinesque’s eastern big-eared bat is not known to occur in Accomack County; the northern limit of its range is southeast Virginia. Therefore, nesting habitat would not be affected by the Proposed Action. To reduce the potential effects to Rafinesque’s eastern big-eared bat resulting from habitat disturbance, NASA has proposed the minimum necessary width for the access roads to the utility-scale wind turbines. The Proposed Action may result in minor adverse impacts on affect the species. Sea Turtles The sites of the Proposed Action lacks essential habitat elements for the loggerhead sea turtle, green sea turtle, leatherback sea turtle, hawksbill sea turtle, and Kemp’s ridley sea turtle. The Proposed Action is anticipated to have no effects on federally listed sea turtles. Northeastern Beach Tiger Beetle The site of the Proposed Action lack essential habitat elements for the Northeast beach tiger beetle. There are no beaches within the project study limits or in close proximity to the proposed construction activity. No effect to this species is anticipated due to the lack of habitat in the area of the Proposed Action. Seabeach Amaranth The sites of the Proposed Action lack essential habitat elements for the seabeach amaranth. There are no beaches within the project study limits or in close proximity to the proposed construction activity. No effect to the seabeach amaranth is anticipated due to the lack of habitat in the area of the Proposed Action. Agency Consultation NASA prepared a Biological Assessment (BA) (Appendix D) with determinations of effects to the species listed in Table 25. The BA was submitted to USFWS and NMFS along with submittal of this Draft EA. No response has been received to date. 126

Environmental Consequences In addition, NASA has prepared monitoring plan to assess the presence of protected species within its property boundaries. This plan will help NASA and USFWS better determine a baseline and effects to species and will serve as a basis for adaptive management of protected species. 4.3.6 Essential Fish Habitat No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, implementation of the Alternative Energy Project would not occur; therefore, no impacts on EFH would occur. Proposed Action Because EFH is located within the wetlands that would be affected by the by construction of two proposed utility-scale wind turbines, NASA completed an EFH Checklist (Appendix E) to determine what, if any impacts may occur on EFH. Based on the EFH Checklist, NASA has determined that the Proposed Action would result in adverse effects on EFH, but they would not be substantial. Effects on EFH would be offset by 0.362 hectare (0.895 acre) of compensatory mitigation at WFF’s Mainland. Alternative One Because EFH is located within the wetlands that would be affected by construction of one utilityscale wind turbine, NASA completed an EFH Checklist (Appendix E) to determine what, if any impacts may occur on EFH. Based on the EFH Checklist, NASA has determined that Alternative One would result in adverse effects on EFH, but they would not be substantial. Effects on EFH would be offset by compensatory mitigation at WFF’s Mainland. Because the potential solar panel installation areas are all located on upland at the Main Base, no EFH is located near the proposed solar panel sites. Therefore, NASA has determined that the installation and operation of solar panels at the Main Base would have no effect on EFH. Alternative Two Because the areas identified as potentially suitable for residential-scale wind turbines and solar panels are all located on upland (exclusively at the Main Base for solar panels), no EFH is located near the proposed sites. Therefore, NASA has determined that the construction of up to 5 residential-scale wind turbines and the installation and operation of solar panels at the Main Base would have no effect on EFH. 4.4 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 4.4.1 Population, Employment, and Income No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, implementation of the Alternative Energy Project would not occur, and there would be no impacts on population, employment, and income. 127

Environmental Consequences<br />

necessary width for the access roads to the utility-scale wind turbines. Although records exist for<br />

the Migrant Loggerhead Shrike in Accomack County, Virginia, field identific<strong>at</strong>ion to subspecies<br />

is rarely reported. Therefore, records for Migrant Loggerhead Shrike in Accomack County are<br />

likely to be Loggerhead Shrike, and Migrant Loggerhead Shrike is not likely to occur within the<br />

action area. The Proposed Action may result in minor adverse impacts on the species since<br />

Shrikes may utilize marsh and marsh-edge habit<strong>at</strong>.<br />

Delmarva Fox Squirrel<br />

No effects are anticip<strong>at</strong>ed to the Delmarva fox squirrel because the site of the Proposed Action<br />

lacks essential habit<strong>at</strong> elements for the species. Their preferred habit<strong>at</strong> is old growth loblolly pine<br />

forests; deep, deciduous swamps; or backwoods adjacent to pine woods. The Proposed Action is<br />

anticip<strong>at</strong>ed to have no effect on the Delmarva fox squirrel.<br />

Rafinesque’s Eastern Big-Eared B<strong>at</strong><br />

The utility-scale wind turbines and access roads would be constructed within potentially suitable<br />

habit<strong>at</strong> for this species. In addition, b<strong>at</strong> mortality has been documented as an adverse effect of<br />

b<strong>at</strong>s colliding with the rot<strong>at</strong>ing blades of wind turbines. However, Rafinesque’s eastern big-eared<br />

b<strong>at</strong> is not known to occur in Accomack County; the northern limit of its range is southeast<br />

Virginia. Therefore, nesting habit<strong>at</strong> would not be affected by the Proposed Action. To reduce the<br />

potential effects to Rafinesque’s eastern big-eared b<strong>at</strong> resulting from habit<strong>at</strong> disturbance, <strong>NASA</strong><br />

has proposed the minimum necessary width for the access roads to the utility-scale wind<br />

turbines. The Proposed Action may result in minor adverse impacts on affect the species.<br />

Sea Turtles<br />

The sites of the Proposed Action lacks essential habit<strong>at</strong> elements for the loggerhead sea turtle,<br />

green sea turtle, le<strong>at</strong>herback sea turtle, hawksbill sea turtle, and Kemp’s ridley sea turtle. The<br />

Proposed Action is anticip<strong>at</strong>ed to have no effects on federally listed sea turtles.<br />

Northeastern Beach Tiger Beetle<br />

The site of the Proposed Action lack essential habit<strong>at</strong> elements for the Northeast beach tiger<br />

beetle. There are no beaches within the project study limits or in close proximity to the proposed<br />

construction activity. No effect to this species is anticip<strong>at</strong>ed due to the lack of habit<strong>at</strong> in the area<br />

of the Proposed Action.<br />

Seabeach Amaranth<br />

The sites of the Proposed Action lack essential habit<strong>at</strong> elements for the seabeach amaranth.<br />

There are no beaches within the project study limits or in close proximity to the proposed<br />

construction activity. No effect to the seabeach amaranth is anticip<strong>at</strong>ed due to the lack of habit<strong>at</strong><br />

in the area of the Proposed Action.<br />

Agency Consult<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>NASA</strong> prepared a Biological Assessment (BA) (Appendix D) with determin<strong>at</strong>ions of effects to<br />

the species listed in Table 25. The BA was submitted to USFWS and NMFS along with<br />

submittal of this <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>EA</strong>. No response has been received to d<strong>at</strong>e.<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!