Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ...
Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ... Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ...
Environmental Consequences The operation and maintenance of the utility-scale and residential-scale wind turbines would result in the use of hazardous materials (i.e., solvents, hydraulic fluid, oil, and paint) and generation of hazardous wastes for maintenance of the turbine engine and parts. Each turbine model has different specifications for lubricating oil and hydraulic fluid quantities. There are three main types of fluid in a wind turbine: cooling fluid for the generator (a mix of glycol and water, similar to that used in automobile radiators), lubricating oil for the gearbox (typically a synthetic lubricating oil), and hydraulic oil for operating the blade pitch system, yaw mechanism, and brakes. The wind turbine generators would be equipped with sensors to automatically detect loss in fluid pressure and increases in temperature and would shut them down in case of a fluid leak. The turbines would also be equipped with fluid catch basin and containment systems to prevent any accidental releases from leaving the nacelle. Based on the limited quantities of fluids contained in the wind turbine generators and the leak detection and containment systems engineered into their design, the potential for an accidental spill from a wind turbine generator malfunction is extremely limited. Furthermore, any accidental gear oil or other fluid leaks from the wind turbines would be contained inside the turbine towers, which are sealed around the base. The wind turbine generator fluids would be checked periodically and must be replenished or replaced infrequently (generally less than once per year and sometimes only once every 5 years). When replacing these fluids, operations staff would climb up to the nacelle and remove the fluids in small (typically 19-liter [5-gallon]) containers and lower them to the ground using a small maintenance crane built into the nacelle itself. The containers would be transferred to a vehicle for transport to a facility for temporary storage (typically less than one month) before being picked up by a licensed transporter for recycling. Replacement fluids are added in the same method, only in reverse. Small quantities of replacement fluids, typically no more than a few 189-liter (50-gallon) drums of lubricating oil and hydraulic oil may be stored in existing facilities for replenishing and replacing spent fluids. These fluids would be stored indoors in appropriate containment. All operations staff would be trained in appropriate handling and spill prevention techniques to avoid any accidental spills. Because only small quantities of fluids would be transported, added, or removed at any one time and would be stored for short periods of time, the potential for an accidental spill during routine maintenance would be extremely limited. Additionally, NASA would ensure implementation of WFF’s ICP safety procedures, training, and mitigation measures, including spill prevention and response. Therefore, no impacts on human and environmental health due to hazardous materials and wastes are anticipated. Alternative One The types of construction and maintenance impacts for the wind turbines described under the Proposed Action would be the same for Alternative One. Maintenance of the solar panels, which primarily involves periodic cleaning, would involve the use of soap concentrates and water, which are not hazardous. Although small amounts of harmful toxins like arsenic and cadmium compounds are present inside the solar cells, they cannot cause adverse effects unless they enter the human body in high doses, which would not occur during normal installation, operation, and maintenance. At ambient temperature and pressure conditions, there would be no vapors or dust generated by the normal operation of PV systems (Markvart and Castaner, 2003). The only 108
Environmental Consequences conceivable situation in which the substances contained within PV cells could become a threat to human health and safety would be if a fire were to engulf the panels and firefighters or others nearby were to inhale any contaminants released into the air (UCS, 1992). After the expected 25-year life span of the solar panels, the PV cell systems would be decommissioned. NASA would recycle the solar panels by sending the spent cells to a smelting or refining facility that specializes in reclaiming materials such as glass, aluminum frames, and semiconductor materials. Currently, many manufacturers accept decommissioned solar panels. The following procedures for reprocessing waste materials and recycled silicon are representative of existing practices: Modules that can be recovered and repaired into working modules would be recovered. Modules that cannot be repaired into working modules would undergo a demanufacturing process to recover aluminum frame material, and where possible recoverable materials. Specialized recyclers would then recycle materials appropriately. The remaining non-recoverable parts of the modules would be crushed and disposed of, according to all Federal, State, and local requirements, in controlled landfill sites. With the implementation of WFF’s ICP and proper procedures for the handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes, no impacts on human and environmental health due to hazardous materials and wastes are anticipated for this alternative. Alternative Two The types of impacts and mitigation measures would be the same as those described for wind turbines and solar panels under Alternative One. Less hazardous materials and wastes related to the wind turbines would be handled and generated compared to Alternative One. However, more hazardous materials and wastes would be handled and generated for the solar panels due to the use of more PV cells compared to Alternative One. With the implementation of WFF’s ICP and proper procedures for the handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes, no adverse impacts on human and environmental health due to hazardous materials and wastes are anticipated for this alternative. 4.3 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 4.3.1 Vegetation No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, implementation of the Alternative Energy Project would not occur; therefore, no impacts on vegetation would occur. Proposed Action Short-term adverse impacts on vegetation are anticipated due to excavation and grading to construct the wind turbines, access roads, entrance and exit boreholes of directional drilling operations on Wallops Island, and the trenches for the residential-scale underground wire. NASA would minimize adverse impacts on vegetation during construction by minimizing the areas of disturbance to the extent practicable, using existing un-vegetated areas for staging (see Figure 6), 109
- Page 81 and 82: Affected Environment For the once-p
- Page 83 and 84: Affected Environment less common, w
- Page 85 and 86: Affected Environment were also obse
- Page 88 and 89: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 90 and 91: Affected Environment Over the entir
- Page 92: 3.2.4.1 Birds Henslow’s Sparrow A
- Page 95 and 96: Affected Environment Monitoring was
- Page 97 and 98: Loggerhead Shrike Affected Environm
- Page 99 and 100: Affected Environment known or recor
- Page 101 and 102: Table 17: Occupational Distribution
- Page 103 and 104: Affected Environment Chincoteague I
- Page 106: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 109 and 110: 3.3.6 Transportation Affected Envir
- Page 111 and 112: Affected Environment Photograph 2:
- Page 114 and 115: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 116 and 117: Proposed Action Environmental Conse
- Page 118 and 119: Environmental Consequences The inst
- Page 120 and 121: Alternative Two Environmental Conse
- Page 122: Environmental Consequences The func
- Page 125 and 126: Environmental Consequences Based on
- Page 127 and 128: Environmental Consequences Table 22
- Page 129 and 130: Environmental Consequences Based on
- Page 131: Alternative One Environmental Conse
- Page 135 and 136: Environmental Consequences wetland
- Page 137 and 138: Environmental Consequences of magni
- Page 139 and 140: Environmental Consequences is the a
- Page 141 and 142: Environmental Consequences (TREC).
- Page 143 and 144: Environmental Consequences why bats
- Page 145 and 146: Environmental Consequences determin
- Page 147 and 148: Environmental Consequences While a
- Page 149 and 150: Gull-Billed Tern Environmental Cons
- Page 151 and 152: Environmental Consequences In addit
- Page 153 and 154: Environmental Consequences staff. T
- Page 155 and 156: Proposed Action Aboveground Resourc
- Page 157 and 158: Alternative One Aboveground Resourc
- Page 159 and 160: 4.4.4 Transportation No Action Alte
- Page 162 and 163: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 164 and 165: Environmental Consequences site tha
- Page 166 and 167: Environmental Consequences 2) Placi
- Page 168 and 169: Environmental Consequences projects
- Page 170 and 171: Environmental Consequences Although
- Page 172 and 173: 4.6 PERMITS, LICENSES, AND APPROVAL
- Page 174 and 175: Mitigation and Monitoring 5.2.1 Pos
- Page 176 and 177: Mitigation and Monitoring would be
- Page 178 and 179: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 180 and 181: Agencies, Organizations, and Person
Environmental Consequences<br />
The oper<strong>at</strong>ion and maintenance of the utility-scale and residential-scale wind turbines would<br />
result in the use of hazardous m<strong>at</strong>erials (i.e., solvents, hydraulic fluid, oil, and paint) and<br />
gener<strong>at</strong>ion of hazardous wastes for maintenance of the turbine engine and parts. Each turbine<br />
model has different specific<strong>at</strong>ions for lubric<strong>at</strong>ing oil and hydraulic fluid quantities. There are<br />
three main types of fluid in a wind turbine: cooling fluid for the gener<strong>at</strong>or (a mix of glycol and<br />
w<strong>at</strong>er, similar to th<strong>at</strong> used in automobile radi<strong>at</strong>ors), lubric<strong>at</strong>ing oil for the gearbox (typically a<br />
synthetic lubric<strong>at</strong>ing oil), and hydraulic oil for oper<strong>at</strong>ing the blade pitch system, yaw mechanism,<br />
and brakes.<br />
The wind turbine gener<strong>at</strong>ors would be equipped with sensors to autom<strong>at</strong>ically detect loss in fluid<br />
pressure and increases in temper<strong>at</strong>ure and would shut them down in case of a fluid leak. The<br />
turbines would also be equipped with fluid c<strong>at</strong>ch basin and containment systems to prevent any<br />
accidental releases from leaving the nacelle.<br />
Based on the limited quantities of fluids contained in the wind turbine gener<strong>at</strong>ors and the leak<br />
detection and containment systems engineered into their design, the potential for an accidental<br />
spill from a wind turbine gener<strong>at</strong>or malfunction is extremely limited. Furthermore, any<br />
accidental gear oil or other fluid leaks from the wind turbines would be contained inside the<br />
turbine towers, which are sealed around the base.<br />
The wind turbine gener<strong>at</strong>or fluids would be checked periodically and must be replenished or<br />
replaced infrequently (generally less than once per year and sometimes only once every 5 years).<br />
When replacing these fluids, oper<strong>at</strong>ions staff would climb up to the nacelle and remove the fluids<br />
in small (typically 19-liter [5-gallon]) containers and lower them to the ground using a small<br />
maintenance crane built into the nacelle itself. The containers would be transferred to a vehicle<br />
for transport to a facility for temporary storage (typically less than one month) before being<br />
picked up by a licensed transporter for recycling. Replacement fluids are added in the same<br />
method, only in reverse. Small quantities of replacement fluids, typically no more than a few<br />
189-liter (50-gallon) drums of lubric<strong>at</strong>ing oil and hydraulic oil may be stored in existing facilities<br />
for replenishing and replacing spent fluids. These fluids would be stored indoors in appropri<strong>at</strong>e<br />
containment. All oper<strong>at</strong>ions staff would be trained in appropri<strong>at</strong>e handling and spill prevention<br />
techniques to avoid any accidental spills. Because only small quantities of fluids would be<br />
transported, added, or removed <strong>at</strong> any one time and would be stored for short periods of time, the<br />
potential for an accidental spill during routine maintenance would be extremely limited.<br />
Additionally, <strong>NASA</strong> would ensure implement<strong>at</strong>ion of WFF’s ICP safety procedures, training,<br />
and mitig<strong>at</strong>ion measures, including spill prevention and response. Therefore, no impacts on<br />
human and environmental health due to hazardous m<strong>at</strong>erials and wastes are anticip<strong>at</strong>ed.<br />
<strong>Altern<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> One<br />
The types of construction and maintenance impacts for the wind turbines described under the<br />
Proposed Action would be the same for <strong>Altern<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> One. Maintenance of the solar panels, which<br />
primarily involves periodic cleaning, would involve the use of soap concentr<strong>at</strong>es and w<strong>at</strong>er,<br />
which are not hazardous. Although small amounts of harmful toxins like arsenic and cadmium<br />
compounds are present inside the solar cells, they cannot cause adverse effects unless they enter<br />
the human body in high doses, which would not occur during normal install<strong>at</strong>ion, oper<strong>at</strong>ion, and<br />
maintenance. At ambient temper<strong>at</strong>ure and pressure conditions, there would be no vapors or dust<br />
gener<strong>at</strong>ed by the normal oper<strong>at</strong>ion of PV systems (Markvart and Castaner, 2003). The only<br />
108