Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ...
Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ... Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ...
Environmental Consequences The installation of solar panels on existing buildings at Wallops Main Base would have no impact on geology and minor, short-term impacts on soils. Because installation of solar panels would require only shallow excavation activities, no impacts on geology are anticipated. The construction of solar panels would result in disturbance of soils. NASA would minimize impacts on soils by acquiring VSMP permits as necessary, and developing and implementing sitespecific SWPPPs and E&SC Plans prior to ground disturbing activities. NASA would revegetate bare soils and incorporate landscaping measures in areas to be left as pervious surfaces (not paved) when construction is complete. Alternative Two Impacts on geology and soils for construction of the residential-scale wind turbines would be the same as described under the Proposed Action, but to a lesser extent since no utility-scale wind turbine would be constructed. The types of impacts from solar panel installation described under Alternative One would be the same for Alternative Two, but the area of soil disturbance would likely be larger due to installation of more solar panels. 4.2.1.3 Land Use No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, implementation of the Alternative Energy Project would not occur; therefore, no impacts on land use would occur. Proposed Action The area where the proposed utility-scale and residential-scale wind turbines would be located is zoned industrial by Accomack County and would be located in areas on WFF property that are currently unused and are not planned for future use. The construction and operation of the proposed wind turbines would not result in changes to land use, or impacts on NASA or the U.S. Navy’s use of the area; therefore, no impacts would occur. Alternative One Impacts on land use under Alternative One would be the same as described under the Proposed Action for wind turbine construction and operation. Installation of the solar panels in grassy areas at the Main Base would result in up to 16 hectares (40 acres) of land unavailable for future use. Approximately 120 hectares (300 acres) at the Main Base are currently occupied by buildings, roads, runways, and other infrastructure and 150 hectares (380 acres) are occupied by forest, leaving approximately 520 hectares (1,280 acres), or 66 percent of the Main Base unoccupied. The 16 hectares (40 acres) of land the solar panels would occupy is about 3 percent of the currently unoccupied land. This would result in long-term adverse impacts on land use in those specific areas. Alternative Two Impacts on land use under Alternative Two would be the same as described under the Proposed Action for wind turbine construction and operation. Installation of the solar panels in grassy areas at the Main Base would result in up to 32 hectares (80 acres) of land unavailable for future uses. Approximately 120 hectares (300 acres) at the Main Base are currently occupied by 94
Environmental Consequences buildings, roads, runways, and other infrastructure and 150 hectares (380 acres) are occupied by forest, leaving approximately 520 hectares (1,280 acres), or 66 percent of the Main Base unoccupied. The 32 hectares (80 acres) of land the solar panels would occupy is about 6 percent of the currently unoccupied land. This would result in long-term adverse impacts on land use in those specific areas. 4.2.2 Water Resources 4.2.2.1 Surface Waters No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, implementation of the Alternative Energy Project would not occur; therefore, no impacts on surface water within the project area would occur. Proposed Action Construction activities including grading, clearing, filling, and excavation would result in disturbance of the ground surface and would have the potential to cause soil erosion and the subsequent transport of sediment into waterways via stormwater. NASA would minimize impacts on surface waters by acquiring VSMP permits and by developing and implementing a site-specific SWPPP and E&SC plans prior to land disturbing activities. Other possible impacts on surface waters during construction include spills or leaks of fuel or oil from vehicles or equipment. The site-specific SWPPP would include Best Management Practices (BMPs) for vehicle and equipment fueling and maintenance, and spill prevention and control measures would be implemented to reduce potential impacts on soils during construction and continued operation and maintenance of the two wind turbines. Any accidental release of contaminants or liquid fuels would be addressed in accordance with the existing WFF ICP. The utility-scale wind turbines would be located in an area where stormwater primarily drains to the west toward Bogues Bay. Short-term minor impacts on surface water quality could occur during construction, but with implementation of mitigation measures for construction activities and stormwater flow, no long-term or adverse impacts on surface waters would occur. Alternative One The types of impacts on surface water would the same as those described under the Proposed Action for the construction wind turbines; however, because only one utility-scale wind turbine would be installed, there would be less land disturbance and less potential for a leak or spill due to less construction activity. Installation of solar panels would not restrict stormwater flow at the Main Base. NASA would minimize impacts on surface waters during construction by acquiring VSMP permits and by developing and implementing a site-specific SWPPP and E&SC plans prior to land disturbing activities. Short-term minor impacts on surface water quality may occur during construction, but with implementation of mitigation measures for construction activities and stormwater flow, no long-term or adverse impacts on surface waters would occur. 95
- Page 68 and 69: 3.1.4 Climate Change Table 8: Calen
- Page 70 and 71: Wind Affected Environment For Wallo
- Page 72 and 73: Affected Environment The Accomack C
- Page 74 and 75: Affected Environment On the souther
- Page 76 and 77: Affected Environment phoeniceus), B
- Page 78: Affected Environment The Saxis Wil
- Page 81 and 82: Affected Environment For the once-p
- Page 83 and 84: Affected Environment less common, w
- Page 85 and 86: Affected Environment were also obse
- Page 88 and 89: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 90 and 91: Affected Environment Over the entir
- Page 92: 3.2.4.1 Birds Henslow’s Sparrow A
- Page 95 and 96: Affected Environment Monitoring was
- Page 97 and 98: Loggerhead Shrike Affected Environm
- Page 99 and 100: Affected Environment known or recor
- Page 101 and 102: Table 17: Occupational Distribution
- Page 103 and 104: Affected Environment Chincoteague I
- Page 106: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 109 and 110: 3.3.6 Transportation Affected Envir
- Page 111 and 112: Affected Environment Photograph 2:
- Page 114 and 115: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 116 and 117: Proposed Action Environmental Conse
- Page 120 and 121: Alternative Two Environmental Conse
- Page 122: Environmental Consequences The func
- Page 125 and 126: Environmental Consequences Based on
- Page 127 and 128: Environmental Consequences Table 22
- Page 129 and 130: Environmental Consequences Based on
- Page 131 and 132: Alternative One Environmental Conse
- Page 133 and 134: Environmental Consequences conceiva
- Page 135 and 136: Environmental Consequences wetland
- Page 137 and 138: Environmental Consequences of magni
- Page 139 and 140: Environmental Consequences is the a
- Page 141 and 142: Environmental Consequences (TREC).
- Page 143 and 144: Environmental Consequences why bats
- Page 145 and 146: Environmental Consequences determin
- Page 147 and 148: Environmental Consequences While a
- Page 149 and 150: Gull-Billed Tern Environmental Cons
- Page 151 and 152: Environmental Consequences In addit
- Page 153 and 154: Environmental Consequences staff. T
- Page 155 and 156: Proposed Action Aboveground Resourc
- Page 157 and 158: Alternative One Aboveground Resourc
- Page 159 and 160: 4.4.4 Transportation No Action Alte
- Page 162 and 163: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 164 and 165: Environmental Consequences site tha
- Page 166 and 167: Environmental Consequences 2) Placi
Environmental Consequences<br />
buildings, roads, runways, and other infrastructure and 150 hectares (380 acres) are occupied by<br />
forest, leaving approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 520 hectares (1,280 acres), or 66 percent of the Main Base<br />
unoccupied. The 32 hectares (80 acres) of land the solar panels would occupy is about 6 percent<br />
of the currently unoccupied land. This would result in long-term adverse impacts on land use in<br />
those specific areas.<br />
4.2.2 W<strong>at</strong>er Resources<br />
4.2.2.1 Surface W<strong>at</strong>ers<br />
No Action <strong>Altern<strong>at</strong>ive</strong><br />
Under the No Action <strong>Altern<strong>at</strong>ive</strong>, implement<strong>at</strong>ion of the <strong>Altern<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> Project would not<br />
occur; therefore, no impacts on surface w<strong>at</strong>er within the project area would occur.<br />
Proposed Action<br />
Construction activities including grading, clearing, filling, and excav<strong>at</strong>ion would result in<br />
disturbance of the ground surface and would have the potential to cause soil erosion and the<br />
subsequent transport of sediment into w<strong>at</strong>erways via stormw<strong>at</strong>er. <strong>NASA</strong> would minimize<br />
impacts on surface w<strong>at</strong>ers by acquiring VSMP permits and by developing and implementing a<br />
site-specific SWPPP and E&SC plans prior to land disturbing activities.<br />
Other possible impacts on surface w<strong>at</strong>ers during construction include spills or leaks of fuel or oil<br />
from vehicles or equipment. The site-specific SWPPP would include Best Management Practices<br />
(BMPs) for vehicle and equipment fueling and maintenance, and spill prevention and control<br />
measures would be implemented to reduce potential impacts on soils during construction and<br />
continued oper<strong>at</strong>ion and maintenance of the two wind turbines. Any accidental release of<br />
contaminants or liquid fuels would be addressed in accordance with the existing WFF ICP.<br />
The utility-scale wind turbines would be loc<strong>at</strong>ed in an area where stormw<strong>at</strong>er primarily drains to<br />
the west toward Bogues Bay. Short-term minor impacts on surface w<strong>at</strong>er quality could occur<br />
during construction, but with implement<strong>at</strong>ion of mitig<strong>at</strong>ion measures for construction activities<br />
and stormw<strong>at</strong>er flow, no long-term or adverse impacts on surface w<strong>at</strong>ers would occur.<br />
<strong>Altern<strong>at</strong>ive</strong> One<br />
The types of impacts on surface w<strong>at</strong>er would the same as those described under the Proposed<br />
Action for the construction wind turbines; however, because only one utility-scale wind turbine<br />
would be installed, there would be less land disturbance and less potential for a leak or spill due<br />
to less construction activity.<br />
Install<strong>at</strong>ion of solar panels would not restrict stormw<strong>at</strong>er flow <strong>at</strong> the Main Base. <strong>NASA</strong> would<br />
minimize impacts on surface w<strong>at</strong>ers during construction by acquiring VSMP permits and by<br />
developing and implementing a site-specific SWPPP and E&SC plans prior to land disturbing<br />
activities. Short-term minor impacts on surface w<strong>at</strong>er quality may occur during construction, but<br />
with implement<strong>at</strong>ion of mitig<strong>at</strong>ion measures for construction activities and stormw<strong>at</strong>er flow, no<br />
long-term or adverse impacts on surface w<strong>at</strong>ers would occur.<br />
95