Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ...
Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ... Alternative Energy Draft EA - NASA Visitor Center at Wallops Flight ...
3.3.3 Environmental Justice Affected Environment The goal of environmental justice from a Federal perspective is to ensure fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and economic situations with regard to the implementation and enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, and Federal policies and programs. EO 12898, Federal Action to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations, (and the February 11, 1994, Presidential Memorandum providing additional guidance for this EO) requires Federal agencies to develop strategies for protecting minority and low-income populations from disproportionate and adverse effects of Federal programs and activities. The EO is “intended to promote non-discrimination in Federal programs substantially affecting human health and the environment.” Accomack County is on the lower end of income measures in the region, with a 2005 median family income of $32,837. As a result, the county is also on the higher end of poverty levels in the region based on U.S. Census Bureau data reports. The per capita income in Accomack County in 2007 was reported to be $18,468, with an estimated 18.0 percent of people below the poverty level (U.S. Census Bureau, 2008b). The per capita income in the Commonwealth of Virginia in 2007 was reported to be $28,255, with an estimated 9.9 percent of people below the poverty level statewide (U.S. Census Bureau, 2008b). In order to ensure compliance with Executive Order 12898, NASA prepared an Environmental Justice Implementation Plan (EJIP) in 1996. NASA evaluated the demographic information in the vicinity of WFF and identified areas that have a higher concentration of minority persons and low-income persons based on federal guidelines. The EJIP also includes an evaluation of all programs at WFF, including tenant activities that could potentially affect human health and the environment. The EJIP demonstrates that NASA will continue to incorporate environmental justice in all its activities and monitor all programs to determine any potential environmental justice impacts on persons in the area. The EPA’s Environmental Justice Coordinators Council has defined minority communities as those exceeding a 50 percent minority population. Table 19 provides a review of Accomack County Census data used to determine the baseline for the facility’s EJIP. Table 19: Environmental Justice Concerns – by Census Tract, Accomack County, VA Tract Location 9901 MD/VA line south including Fisher’s Point 9902 MD/VA line south including Wallops Island to Assawoman Inlet 9903 West of 9902 and 9904, MD/VA line south to Ann’s Cove Road 9904 East of Mears Station Road, South of 9902 south to Horseshoe Lead Source: NASA, 2008a Percent Minority Percent Low Percent 2000 Income 2000 Poverty 2000 1.97 51.53 12.80 41.75 49.96 16.38 24.66 55.94 19.28 59.14 51.61 27.14 78
Affected Environment Chincoteague Island, at approximately 13 kilometers (8 miles) northeast of Wallops Island, is the closest incorporated town to WFF. No minority or low-income communities exist on the portion of Chincoteague Island that lies within a 4-kilometer (2.5-mile) radius of Wallops Island. EO 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks, encourages Federal agencies to consider the potential effects of Federal policies, programs, and activities on children. The closest day care centers, schools, camps, nursing homes, and hospitals are addressed within the EJIP. 3.3.4 Aviation Safety Requirements FAA regulates structures that may pose a threat to aviation safety. A sponsor proposing any type of construction or alteration of a structure that may affect the National Airspace System is required under the provisions of 14 CFR 77 to notify the FAA by completing the Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration form (FAA Form 7460-1). The form should be sent to the Obstruction Evaluation service. Any temporary or permanent structure, including all appurtenances, that exceeds an overall height of 61 meters (200 feet) above ground level or exceeds any obstruction standard contained in 14 CFR 77, should normally be marked and/or lighted. However, an FAA aeronautical study may reveal that the absence of marking and/or lighting will not impair aviation safety. Conversely, the object may present such an extraordinary hazard potential that higher standards may be recommended for increased conspicuity to ensure safety to air navigation. FAA Advisory Circular AC 70/7460-1K provides requirements for obstruction (wind turbines are included in the “obstruction” category) marking and lighting that (FAA, 2007). 3.3.5 Cultural Resources The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, (P.L. 89-665; 16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.) as amended, outlines Federal policy to protect historic properties and promote historic preservation in cooperation with other nations, Tribal governments, States, and local governments. The NHPA established the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and designated the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) as the individual responsible for administering State-level programs. The NHPA also created the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), the Federal agency responsible for overseeing the Section 106 process and providing commentary on Federal activities, programs, and policies that affect historic properties. Section 106 of the NHPA and its implementing regulations (36 CFR 800) outlines the procedures for Federal agencies to follow to take into account their actions on historic properties. The Section 106 process applies to any Federal undertaking that has the potential to affect historic properties, defined in the NHPA as those properties that are listing in or eligible for listing in the NRHP. Under Section 106, Federal agencies are responsible for identifying historic properties within the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for an undertaking, assessing the effects of the undertaking on those historic properties, if present, and considering ways to avoid, minimize, and mitigate any adverse effects. Because Section 106 of the NHPA is a process by which the Federal government assesses the effects of its undertakings on historic properties, it is the primary regulatory framework that is utilized in the NEPA process to determine impacts on cultural resources. 79
- Page 51 and 52: Decommissioning Proposed Action and
- Page 53 and 54: turbines because these costs would
- Page 55 and 56: SECTION THREE: AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
- Page 58 and 59: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 60: Affected Environment The Virginia S
- Page 63 and 64: Affected Environment FIRM Community
- Page 66 and 67: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 68 and 69: 3.1.4 Climate Change Table 8: Calen
- Page 70 and 71: Wind Affected Environment For Wallo
- Page 72 and 73: Affected Environment The Accomack C
- Page 74 and 75: Affected Environment On the souther
- Page 76 and 77: Affected Environment phoeniceus), B
- Page 78: Affected Environment The Saxis Wil
- Page 81 and 82: Affected Environment For the once-p
- Page 83 and 84: Affected Environment less common, w
- Page 85 and 86: Affected Environment were also obse
- Page 88 and 89: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 90 and 91: Affected Environment Over the entir
- Page 92: 3.2.4.1 Birds Henslow’s Sparrow A
- Page 95 and 96: Affected Environment Monitoring was
- Page 97 and 98: Loggerhead Shrike Affected Environm
- Page 99 and 100: Affected Environment known or recor
- Page 101: Table 17: Occupational Distribution
- Page 106: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 109 and 110: 3.3.6 Transportation Affected Envir
- Page 111 and 112: Affected Environment Photograph 2:
- Page 114 and 115: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 116 and 117: Proposed Action Environmental Conse
- Page 118 and 119: Environmental Consequences The inst
- Page 120 and 121: Alternative Two Environmental Conse
- Page 122: Environmental Consequences The func
- Page 125 and 126: Environmental Consequences Based on
- Page 127 and 128: Environmental Consequences Table 22
- Page 129 and 130: Environmental Consequences Based on
- Page 131 and 132: Alternative One Environmental Conse
- Page 133 and 134: Environmental Consequences conceiva
- Page 135 and 136: Environmental Consequences wetland
- Page 137 and 138: Environmental Consequences of magni
- Page 139 and 140: Environmental Consequences is the a
- Page 141 and 142: Environmental Consequences (TREC).
- Page 143 and 144: Environmental Consequences why bats
- Page 145 and 146: Environmental Consequences determin
- Page 147 and 148: Environmental Consequences While a
- Page 149 and 150: Gull-Billed Tern Environmental Cons
- Page 151 and 152: Environmental Consequences In addit
Affected Environment<br />
Chincoteague Island, <strong>at</strong> approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 13 kilometers (8 miles) northeast of <strong>Wallops</strong> Island, is the<br />
closest incorpor<strong>at</strong>ed town to WFF. No minority or low-income communities exist on the portion<br />
of Chincoteague Island th<strong>at</strong> lies within a 4-kilometer (2.5-mile) radius of <strong>Wallops</strong> Island.<br />
EO 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks,<br />
encourages Federal agencies to consider the potential effects of Federal policies, programs, and<br />
activities on children. The closest day care centers, schools, camps, nursing homes, and hospitals<br />
are addressed within the EJIP.<br />
3.3.4 Avi<strong>at</strong>ion Safety Requirements<br />
FAA regul<strong>at</strong>es structures th<strong>at</strong> may pose a thre<strong>at</strong> to avi<strong>at</strong>ion safety. A sponsor proposing any type<br />
of construction or alter<strong>at</strong>ion of a structure th<strong>at</strong> may affect the N<strong>at</strong>ional Airspace System is<br />
required under the provisions of 14 CFR 77 to notify the FAA by completing the Notice of<br />
Proposed Construction or Alter<strong>at</strong>ion form (FAA Form 7460-1). The form should be sent to the<br />
Obstruction Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion service.<br />
Any temporary or permanent structure, including all appurtenances, th<strong>at</strong> exceeds an overall<br />
height of 61 meters (200 feet) above ground level or exceeds any obstruction standard contained<br />
in 14 CFR 77, should normally be marked and/or lighted. However, an FAA aeronautical study<br />
may reveal th<strong>at</strong> the absence of marking and/or lighting will not impair avi<strong>at</strong>ion safety.<br />
Conversely, the object may present such an extraordinary hazard potential th<strong>at</strong> higher standards<br />
may be recommended for increased conspicuity to ensure safety to air navig<strong>at</strong>ion. FAA Advisory<br />
Circular AC 70/7460-1K provides requirements for obstruction (wind turbines are included in<br />
the “obstruction” c<strong>at</strong>egory) marking and lighting th<strong>at</strong> (FAA, 2007).<br />
3.3.5 Cultural Resources<br />
The N<strong>at</strong>ional Historic Preserv<strong>at</strong>ion Act (NHPA) of 1966, (P.L. 89-665; 16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.) as<br />
amended, outlines Federal policy to protect historic properties and promote historic preserv<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
in cooper<strong>at</strong>ion with other n<strong>at</strong>ions, Tribal governments, St<strong>at</strong>es, and local governments. The<br />
NHPA established the N<strong>at</strong>ional Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and design<strong>at</strong>ed the St<strong>at</strong>e<br />
Historic Preserv<strong>at</strong>ion Office (SHPO) as the individual responsible for administering St<strong>at</strong>e-level<br />
programs. The NHPA also cre<strong>at</strong>ed the Advisory Council on Historic Preserv<strong>at</strong>ion (ACHP), the<br />
Federal agency responsible for overseeing the Section 106 process and providing commentary on<br />
Federal activities, programs, and policies th<strong>at</strong> affect historic properties.<br />
Section 106 of the NHPA and its implementing regul<strong>at</strong>ions (36 CFR 800) outlines the procedures<br />
for Federal agencies to follow to take into account their actions on historic properties. The<br />
Section 106 process applies to any Federal undertaking th<strong>at</strong> has the potential to affect historic<br />
properties, defined in the NHPA as those properties th<strong>at</strong> are listing in or eligible for listing in the<br />
NRHP. Under Section 106, Federal agencies are responsible for identifying historic properties<br />
within the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for an undertaking, assessing the effects of the<br />
undertaking on those historic properties, if present, and considering ways to avoid, minimize,<br />
and mitig<strong>at</strong>e any adverse effects. Because Section 106 of the NHPA is a process by which the<br />
Federal government assesses the effects of its undertakings on historic properties, it is the<br />
primary regul<strong>at</strong>ory framework th<strong>at</strong> is utilized in the NEPA process to determine impacts on<br />
cultural resources.<br />
79