Cycas-circinalis-cas.. - Cycad Specialist Group

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References Cited Anten, N.P.R., Martinez-Ramos, M.,& Ackerly, D.D.(2003). Defoliation and growth in an understory palm: quantifying the contributions of compensatory responses. Ecology 84, 2905–2918. Botha, J., Witkowski, E.T.F.,& Shackleton, C.M.( 2004). The impact of commercial harvesting on Waburgia salutaris (‘pepper-bark tree’) in Mpumalanga South Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 13, 1675 – 1698. Endress, B.A., Gorchov, D.L. & Noble R.B. (2004). Non-timber forest product extraction: effect of harvest and browsing on an understory palm. Ecological Applications, 14, 1139 -1153. Flores, C.F. & Ashton, P.M.S. (2000), Harvesting impact and economic value of Geonoma deversa, Arecaceae, an understory palm used for roof thatching in the Peruvian Amazon. Economic Botany, 54, 267 – 277. Ghimire, S.K., McKey, D. &Ahumeeruddy-Thomas, Y (2005). Conservation of Himalayan medicinal plants: Harvesting patterns and ecology of two threatened species, Nardostachys grandiflora DC. and Neopicrorhiza scrophulariiflora (Pennell) Hong. Biological Conservation 124, 463-475. Hamilton, A.C., (2004). Medicinal plants, conservation and livelihoods. Biodiversity and Conservation 13(8), 1477-1517. Hill, K.D. (2003). Cycas circinalis. In: IUCN 2006. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Iqbal, M. (1993) International trade in non-wood forest products. An overview. FAO, Rome. IUCN 2006. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Keystone Foundation (2005). Forests, Honey and Adivasis – A report on Traditional Resource Use, Livelihood and Markets in the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, Keystone Foundation, Kotagiri, The Niligirs.Prabhakar , R. Resource Use, Culture and Ecological Change: A case study of the Nilgiri Hills of Southern India, CES, IISc Bangalore, March 1994, Unpublished Ph.D thesis Lange, D., & Schippmann, U. (1997) Trade survey of medicinal plants in Germany. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A.B. & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853. 24
Nantel, P., Gagnon, D. & Nault, A. (1996) Population viability analysis of American ginseng and wild leek harvested in stochastic environments. Conservation Biology, 10, 608-621. Prakbhakar, R. (1994). Resource Use, Culture and Ecological Change: A case study of the Nilgiri Hills of Southern India, CES, IISc Bangalore, March 1994, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis Raimondo, D. & J.S. Donaldson (2003). Responses of cycads with different lifehistories to the impact of plant collecting. Biological Conservation 111, 345-358. Ratsirason, J., Silander J.A.Jr. & Richard, A.F. (1996). Conservation and management of a threatened Madagascar palm species, Neodypsis decary Jumelle. Conservation Biology, 10, 40 – 52. Ravikumar, K. & D.K.Ved. (2000). Illustrated Field Guide-100 Red Listed Medicinal Plants of conservation concern in Southern India. FRLHT, Bangalore, India Samraj T. (2002). Non timber Forest Products-Who is paying the price? Unpublished report, Keystone Foundation, Kotagiri. Shanley, P. & Leda, L. (2003). The impacts of forest degredation on medicinal plant use a nd implications for healtcare in Eastern Amazonia. Bioscience 356 (6): 573-584. Uniyal, R.C., Uniyal, M.R. & Jain, P. (2000) Cultivation of medicinal plants in India. A reference book. TRAFFIC India & WWF India, New Delhi, India. Walter, S. (2001) Non-wood forest products in Africa. A regional and national overview. Les produits forestiers non ligneux en Afrique. Un aperçu régional et national. Working Paper/Document de Travail FOPW/01/1. FAO, Forestry Department, Rome, Italy. Whitham, T.G., Maschinski, J., Larson, K.C. & Page, K.N. (1991) Plant response to herbivory: the continium from negative to positive and underlying physiological mechanisms. Plant-animal interactions (eds D.W. Price, T.M. Lewinsohn, G.W. Fernades, & W.W. Benson), pp. 227-256. John Wiley and Sons, New York 25
Page 1 and 2: Harvest, trade, and conservation of
Page 3 and 4: 3) Assess the impacts of harvest on
Page 5 and 6: Fig. 1. Biophysical zones of the Ni
Page 7 and 8: Fig 2. Location of C. circinalis st
Page 9 and 10: harvest , ratio of female: male ind
Page 11 and 12: Table 3 Cont’d. Pith Yes Yes Medi
Page 13 and 14: Fig. 3. Cycas Circinalis L. a) adul
Page 15 and 16: In total, 150 Cycas circinalis indi
Page 17 and 18: Fig. 5. Relationship between C. cir
Page 19 and 20: There was a very strong positive co
Page 21 and 22: 5. Discussion 5.1 Traditional fruit
Page 23: populations would be to push for a
Page 27: Can you predict productivity and wh

Cycas-circinalis-cas.. - Cycad Specialist Group

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?