25.03.2013 Views

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72<br />

<strong>Health</strong> systems in transition <strong>Canada</strong><br />

3.3.2 Collection<br />

The dominant sources of funding are the general revenue funds of F/P/T<br />

governments. The bulk of provincial revenues is derived from individual<br />

income taxes, consumption taxes, corporation taxes and, at least in the case of<br />

resource-rich jurisdictions, resource royalties or taxes.<br />

These general tax revenues are supplemented by health premiums in three<br />

provinces. In British Columbia, health premiums come in the <strong>for</strong>m of a poll<br />

tax on individuals ($64 per year in 2012) and families ($116 <strong>for</strong> a family of two<br />

and $121 <strong>for</strong> a family of three or more in 2012), while in Ontario and Quebec<br />

they take the <strong>for</strong>m of a surtax that is collected through a progressive income<br />

tax system. 1<br />

In both cases, premiums are only notionally earmarked <strong>for</strong> health spending<br />

and in fact flow into the general revenue funds of the provincial governments<br />

and thus are treated as part of general taxation. It should also be noted that<br />

health services cannot be denied on the basis of non-payment of premiums,<br />

and the provinces must rely on other remedies to en<strong>for</strong>ce their collection.<br />

<strong>Health</strong> premiums raise less than 20% of what is expended by the provincial<br />

governments on health each year (McDonnell & McDonnell, 2005). A health<br />

premium in Alberta was eliminated in 2009, after a Task Force on <strong>Health</strong><br />

Care Funding and Revenue Generation concluded that the premiums collected<br />

amounted to less than 13% of provincial health revenue needs (Alberta <strong>Health</strong><br />

and wellness, 2002).<br />

3.3.3 Pooling of funds and health system transfers<br />

Budgetary allocations <strong>for</strong> health expenditures are made at three main levels in<br />

<strong>Canada</strong>: (1) the federal government (2) the provincial and territorial governments<br />

and (3) RHAs. At the federal and provincial levels, budgetary allocations are<br />

decided in cabinet and then reviewed and passed in the respective legislative<br />

chambers.<br />

RHAs do not collect taxes but they allocate the funds they receive from<br />

ministries of health based on what they perceive to be the health demands of<br />

the populations they serve and the health care organizations and providers<br />

they fund. In the past, provincial RHA allocation <strong>for</strong>mulas were used as a tool<br />

of health system re<strong>for</strong>m – specifically to encourage more activity in upstream<br />

primary care and public health from downstream acute care. However, at least<br />

in most cases, these funding allocation <strong>for</strong>mulas do not appear to have achieved<br />

1 At the time of writing, the government of Quebec announced its intention to repeal its health surtax.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!