25.03.2013 Views

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Health</strong> systems in transition <strong>Canada</strong> 31<br />

Table 2.3<br />

<strong>Regional</strong>ization in the provinces and territories<br />

RHAs first established<br />

(year)<br />

Number of RHAs when<br />

first established<br />

Number of RHAs<br />

in 2011<br />

British Columbia 1997 52 5<br />

Alberta 1994 17 1<br />

Saskatchewan 1992 32 13<br />

Manitoba 1997 12 11<br />

Ontario 2005 14 14<br />

Quebec 1989 18 18<br />

New Brunswick 1992 8 2<br />

Nova Scotia 1996 4 9<br />

Prince Edward Island 1993 6 1<br />

Newfoundland and Labrador 1994 6 6<br />

Northwest Territories 1997 8 8<br />

Sources: Axelsson, Marchildon & Repullo-Labrador (2007) and current provincial and territorial ministry websites consulted<br />

in November 2011 (see section 9.2).<br />

Notes: Year of RHA establishment based on calendar year in which law establishing regionalization was passed; jurisdictions with<br />

one RHA have separated RHA governance and mandate from ministry of health governance and mandate, similar to other<br />

regionalized jurisdictions.<br />

While the provinces have the primary governance responsibility <strong>for</strong> most<br />

public health care services, the federal government plays a key role in setting<br />

pan-Canadian standards <strong>for</strong> hospital, diagnostic and medical care services<br />

through the <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Act and the <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Transfer (see section<br />

3.3.3). The federal department of health – <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> – is responsible <strong>for</strong><br />

ensuring that the provincial and territorial governments are adhering to the<br />

five criteria of the <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Act. Although conditional transfers are a<br />

common policy tool in most federations, the use of the federal spending power<br />

in health care has been more controversial in <strong>Canada</strong>, in large part because of<br />

the desire of some provincial governments and policy advocates <strong>for</strong> an even<br />

greater degree of fiscal and administrative decentralization (Marchildon, 2004;<br />

Boessenkool, 2010).<br />

While provincial and territorial governments must provide universally<br />

insured services to all registered Indians and recognized Inuit residents, the<br />

First Nations and Inuit <strong>Health</strong> Branch of <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> provides these citizens<br />

supplemental coverage <strong>for</strong> “non-insured health benefits” (NIHB) such as<br />

prescription drugs, dental care and vision care as well as medical transportation<br />

to access medicare services not provided on-reserve or in the community of<br />

residence. In addition, <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> and the PHAC provide a number of<br />

population health and community health programmes in First Nation and Inuit<br />

communities. <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> is also responsible <strong>for</strong> regulating the safety and<br />

efficacy of therapeutic products, including medical devices, pharmaceuticals

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!