25.03.2013 Views

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Health</strong> systems in transition <strong>Canada</strong> 25<br />

The next major push <strong>for</strong> public health coverage came from the central<br />

government as part of its wartime planning and post-war reconstruction ef<strong>for</strong>ts<br />

(MacDougall, 2009). In the Dominion–Provincial Reconstruction Conference<br />

of 1945–1946, the federal government put <strong>for</strong>ward a broad package of social<br />

security and fiscal changes, including an offer to cost-share 60% of the<br />

provincial cost of universal health insurance. The offer was ultimately rejected<br />

because of the concerns, mainly held by the Governments of Ontario and<br />

Quebec, about the administrative and tax arrangements that would accompany<br />

the comprehensive social security programme. The failure of this conference<br />

<strong>for</strong>ced a more piecemeal approach to the introduction of universal health<br />

coverage in the post-war years.<br />

In 1947, the Saskatchewan Government implemented a universal hospital<br />

services plan popularly known as “hospitalization”. Unlike private insurance<br />

policies, no limitation was placed on the number of “entitlement days” as long<br />

as the hospital services rendered were medically necessary and no distinction<br />

was made between basic services and optional extras. In addition to hospital<br />

services, coverage included X-rays, laboratory services and some prescription<br />

drugs used on an inpatient basis. These design features did much to eliminate<br />

the possibility of a parallel tier of private hospital insurance. Saskatchewan was<br />

financially aided by the federal government with the introduction of national<br />

health grants in 1948 (Johnson, 2004b). In addition to providing money <strong>for</strong><br />

new hospital construction, these grants helped to fund provincial initiatives in<br />

public health, mental health, venereal disease, tuberculosis and general health<br />

surveys (Taylor, 1987).<br />

In 1949, the Government of British Columbia implemented a universal<br />

hospital insurance scheme based on the Saskatchewan model. One year later,<br />

the Government of Alberta introduced its own hospitalization scheme through<br />

subsidies paid to those municipalities that agreed to provide public hospital<br />

coverage to residents. Both programmes encountered challenges. In British<br />

Columbia, the difficulty of premium collection led to a revamping of the<br />

programme after a new administration was elected in 1952 (Marchildon &<br />

O’Byrne, 2009). In Alberta, the partial and voluntary nature of the initiative<br />

meant that on the eve of the introduction of national hospitalization in 1957,<br />

25% of the population still did not have hospital insurance (Marchildon, 2009).<br />

In 1955, the Government of Ontario announced its willingness to implement<br />

public coverage <strong>for</strong> hospital and diagnostic services if the federal government<br />

would share the cost with the province. One year later, the federal government<br />

agreed in principle to the proposal, and passed the Hospital Insurance and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!