25.03.2013 Views

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Health</strong> systems in transition <strong>Canada</strong> 23<br />

principles of which are upheld by provinces wanting to receive their full share<br />

of the <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Transfer (see Fig. 2.1). By not taxing health benefits<br />

through employment-based insurance, the federal government also provides an<br />

implicit subsidy to encourage PHI coverage <strong>for</strong> non-medicare health services<br />

and pharmaceuticals.<br />

2.2 Historical background<br />

Provincial governments have a long history of providing subsidies to hospitals<br />

to admit and treat all patients irrespective of their ability to pay. The government<br />

of Ontario set the template through the Charity Aid Act of 1874 in which<br />

non-profit-making municipal, charitable and faith-based (mainly Catholic but<br />

also Protestant and Jewish) hospitals were obliged to accept some regulatory<br />

oversight – and indigent patients on the basis of medical need – in return <strong>for</strong> a<br />

per diem reimbursement. Private profit-making hospitals were excluded from<br />

this arrangement, thus restricting the growth of such hospitals in <strong>Canada</strong>. At<br />

the same time, the proliferation of municipal and non-profit-making hospitals<br />

voluntarily serving a public purpose meant that there were few state-owned and<br />

controlled hospitals (Boychuk, 1999). The major exceptions to this evolution<br />

were the provincially administered mental hospitals that emerged in the<br />

twentieth century in response to the poor state of private and nongovernmental<br />

asylums (Dyck, 2011). Cottage hospitals in the coastal fishing communities of<br />

Newfoundland as well as the inpatient institutions <strong>for</strong> the treatment of severe<br />

and chronic mental illness, tuberculosis and cancer were also run directly<br />

by some provincial governments (Grzybowski & Allen, 1999; Lawson &<br />

Noseworthy, 2009).<br />

As was the case with hospital care of the indigent, Ontario initially led<br />

the way in facilitating financial protection in the event of illness. In 1914, the<br />

provincial government introduced worker’s compensation legislation that<br />

provided medical, hospital and rehabilitation care <strong>for</strong> all entitled workers in the<br />

event of any work-related accident or injury in return <strong>for</strong> workers giving up their<br />

legal right to sue employers. This Ontario law, and the Workers’ Compensation<br />

Board (WCB) that it established, became the model <strong>for</strong> the remaining provinces<br />

(Babcock, 2006). Less than two decades later, Ontario would also be the first<br />

jurisdiction to establish a province-wide medical service plan <strong>for</strong> all social<br />

assistance recipients (Naylor, 1986; Taylor, 1987).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!