25.03.2013 Views

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Health</strong> systems in transition <strong>Canada</strong> 11<br />

over the past few decades, <strong>Canada</strong> has played a constructive role in the<br />

negotiation of this landmark convention and in facilitating a global ef<strong>for</strong>t to<br />

reduce tobacco consumption (Kapur, 2003; Roemer, Taylor & Lariviere, 2005).<br />

<strong>Canada</strong> was also a catalyst in the establishment of the 2001 Global <strong>Health</strong><br />

Security Initiative (GHSI) led by the ministers or secretaries of health from<br />

eight countries (<strong>Canada</strong>, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the United<br />

Kingdom and the United States) and the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission with the WHO<br />

acting as a technical advisor. In addition to its work on strengthening global<br />

preparedness and response to threats of chemical, biological and radio-nuclear<br />

terrorism and the containment of contagious diseases, GHSI has developed a<br />

vaccine-procurement protocol. <strong>Canada</strong> has played a lead role with the WHO<br />

in identifying chronic disease prevention and control, and in helping establish<br />

a Framework Agreement <strong>for</strong> Cooperation on Chronic Diseases in 2005.<br />

Additionally, <strong>Canada</strong> is a member of the <strong>World</strong> Trade <strong>Organization</strong> (WTO)<br />

and, with the United States and Mexico, a member of the North American Free<br />

Trade Agreement (NAFTA). NAFTA and the General Agreement on Trade<br />

in Services (GATS) under the WTO are very broad in their scope but both<br />

contain provisions that ostensibly protect public-sector health care services<br />

from coming under these trade rules. NAFTA, <strong>for</strong> example, exempts all “social<br />

services established or maintained <strong>for</strong> a public purpose” from its trade and<br />

investment liberalization provisions. In contrast, GATS only applies to those<br />

services or sectors that are explicitly made subject to the agreement, and<br />

countries such as <strong>Canada</strong> have chosen not to include its own public-sector health<br />

care services in GATS (Romanow, 2002; Ouellet, 2004). Nevertheless, there<br />

remains some anxiety about public sector health care being subject to trade<br />

laws, particularly hospital and medical services, fuelled by the apprehension<br />

that <strong>for</strong>eign corporations may eventually demand “national treatment” with the<br />

private or eventually privatized sectors of <strong>Canada</strong>’s public health care system<br />

(Grishaber-Otto & Sinclair, 2004; Johnson, 2004a). Labour unions, in particular,<br />

have been vocal in their concern about the privatization of health facilities and<br />

the potential impact of trade agreements in the sectors where privatization has<br />

occurred, or may occur in the future.<br />

According to the <strong>World</strong> Bank’s evaluation of democratic governance,<br />

<strong>Canada</strong> is among the best-governed countries in the world. Based on numerous<br />

indicators in six broad categories, including control of corruption, effectiveness,<br />

accountability and political stability, <strong>Canada</strong> is outranked only by Sweden in<br />

the country comparison shown in Table 1.7.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!