25.03.2013 Views

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Health</strong> systems in transition <strong>Canada</strong> 139<br />

For the general public and health system decision-makers, waiting times have<br />

emerged as a major indicator of quality in <strong>Canada</strong>. As discussed in Chapter 6,<br />

first ministers identified five waiting time priority areas in the 10-Year Plan<br />

of 2004: cancer, heart, joint replacement, sight restoration and diagnostic<br />

imaging. They then asked their respective health ministers to produce a set<br />

of pan-Canadian benchmarks against which per<strong>for</strong>mance could be measured<br />

over time.<br />

In 2005, health ministers produced six waiting time benchmarks <strong>for</strong> specific<br />

procedures in four of the five priority areas: (1) radiation therapy to treat cancer<br />

within four weeks; (2) cardiac bypass surgery within 2–26 weeks depending on<br />

the urgency of care; (3) surgery to remove cataracts within 16 weeks; (4) hip<br />

replacements within 26 weeks; (5) knee replacements within 26 weeks; and (6)<br />

surgical repair of hip fractures within 48 hours. While health ministers were<br />

unable to reach a consensus on pan-Canadian benchmarks <strong>for</strong> MRI and CT<br />

scans, some ministries of health have set their own waiting time thresholds <strong>for</strong><br />

advanced diagnostics. Table 7.4 indicates that while most provinces have met or<br />

come close to meeting the benchmarks <strong>for</strong> cancer radiation therapy and cardiac<br />

bypass surgery, they still have some distance to go be<strong>for</strong>e they meet the waiting<br />

time benchmarks <strong>for</strong> joint replacement and sight restoration.<br />

7.4.3 Equity of outcomes<br />

As in other OECD countries, there is a robust relationship between<br />

socioeconomic status and health outcomes – the lower status the poorer are<br />

health outcomes. In <strong>Canada</strong>, there is also considerable evidence of a strong<br />

relationship between socioeconomic status and health care utilization – the<br />

lower education and income level of individuals, <strong>for</strong> example, the more likely<br />

they are to use more health care services (Mustard et al., 1997; Roos & Mustard,<br />

1997; Curtis & MacMinn, 2008). The hard policy question is the extent to which<br />

existing and proposed health system interventions and services will improve<br />

health outcomes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!