25.03.2013 Views

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

136<br />

<strong>Health</strong> systems in transition <strong>Canada</strong><br />

of the Canadian Constitution, and section 36(2) of the Constitution Act 1982<br />

stipulates that the Government of <strong>Canada</strong> is required to make “equalization<br />

payments to ensure that provincial governments have sufficient revenues<br />

to provide reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonably<br />

comparable levels of taxation”.<br />

The <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Transfer provides both explicit and implicit regional<br />

redistribution. Through the <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Transfer, revenues that are collected<br />

on a national basis are redistributed to the provinces, and those provinces with<br />

shallower tax bases benefit from the revenues collected in provinces with deeper<br />

pockets. There is also explicit equalization currently built into the <strong>Canada</strong><br />

<strong>Health</strong> Transfer that assists less wealthy provinces. Under the <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />

Transfer and its predecessor, the <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>Health</strong> and Social Transfer, the <strong>for</strong>mula<br />

that calculated the share of each province involved a degree of equalization in<br />

which less wealthy provinces received slightly more per capita than wealthier<br />

provinces. After 2014, this element of equalization is to be terminated in<br />

favour of pure per capita payments. Nonetheless, as long as federal revenues<br />

fund some portion of provincial health care costs, there is some redistribution<br />

from wealthier parts of the country (where taxpayers pay more federal income<br />

and corporate taxes) to less wealthy parts of the country – an implicit <strong>for</strong>m of<br />

revenue redistribution that would not exist if provinces alone raised revenues<br />

<strong>for</strong> their own health care expenditures.<br />

7.4 <strong>Health</strong> outcomes, health service outcomes and<br />

quality of care<br />

7.4.1 Population health and amenable mortality<br />

Since the trends in health status have already been summarized in section<br />

1.5, this section will focus on improvements in population health that can be<br />

attributed to the health system. It is extremely difficult to disentangle the<br />

contribution of the health system to health, through organized programmes,<br />

policies and interventions to prevent and treat illness and injury. In the face of<br />

these difficulties, successive researchers have refined an approach known as<br />

amenable mortality to isolate the impact of the health system from the other<br />

determinants of health.<br />

Amenable mortality refers to death from selected diseases where death<br />

would not occur if those individuals had access to timely and effective health<br />

care. By isolating where death could be avoided and the condition in question

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!