25.03.2013 Views

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

122<br />

<strong>Health</strong> systems in transition <strong>Canada</strong><br />

In contrast, there has been more limited progress on the intergovernmental<br />

front since the first ministers’ 10-Year Plan to Strengthen <strong>Health</strong> Care (CICS,<br />

2004). Following that meeting, provincial and territorial governments used<br />

additional federal cash transfers to shorten waiting times in priority areas,<br />

reinvigorate primary care re<strong>for</strong>m and provide additional coverage <strong>for</strong> home<br />

care services that could be substituted <strong>for</strong> hospital care. While a number of<br />

provincial and territorial governments introduced some <strong>for</strong>m of catastrophic<br />

drug coverage <strong>for</strong> their own residents, they achieved very little in <strong>for</strong>ging a<br />

pan-Canadian approach to prescription drug coverage and management.<br />

6.1 Analysis of recent re<strong>for</strong>ms<br />

The modern era of Canadian health care re<strong>for</strong>m began in the late 1980s and<br />

early 1990s after the passage of the <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Act (1984). This federal<br />

law locked in place a pattern of universal coverage that had originally been<br />

established through the Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act (1957)<br />

and the Medical Care Act (1966). By withdrawing transfer funding from those<br />

jurisdictions permitting user fees and extra billing on a dollar-<strong>for</strong>-dollar basis,<br />

and then returning most of the nearly C$250 million originally withdrawn after<br />

the offending provinces had eliminated user fees and extra billing, the federal<br />

government entrenched the principle of first dollar coverage.<br />

Since universal coverage remained limited to medically necessary hospital<br />

and physician services – with no sustained ef<strong>for</strong>t to expand this basket of<br />

universally covered services – this “narrow but deep” coverage has remained the<br />

policy status quo ever since in <strong>Canada</strong>. At the same time, the law discouraged<br />

governments from reducing universal coverage <strong>for</strong> health care despite major<br />

cuts in public spending in response to decades of deficit-spending and a slowing<br />

economy in the early to mid-1990s. Conversely, when the economy improved<br />

and governments benefited from a fiscal bonus because of reduced payments<br />

on the debt, they chose not to increase universal coverage even marginally<br />

despite the recommendations of a Royal Commission (Romanow, 2002) and<br />

a Senate Committee (Senate of <strong>Canada</strong> 2002). As a consequence, there have<br />

been no major changes to the universal basket of health services since medicare<br />

was introduced.<br />

In what follows, more recent and incremental health re<strong>for</strong>ms have been<br />

separated into two movements, one driven by the desire <strong>for</strong> greater coordination<br />

and integration through structural reorganization, and the second motivated by<br />

concerns about quality of care. In the first set of re<strong>for</strong>ms, governments across

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!