25.03.2013 Views

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Health</strong> systems in transition <strong>Canada</strong> 109<br />

deeper coverage than residents living in the four Atlantic provinces (Romanow,<br />

2002). In response to this policy problem, some experts have long argued<br />

<strong>for</strong> a single national drug plan and <strong>for</strong>mulary as well as a single agency to<br />

regulate pharmaceutical pricing. However, such an approach is challenged by<br />

two opposing imperatives: that of provincial governments, especially Quebec,<br />

which wish to retain control over provincial drug policies including prescription<br />

drug plans, and that of the federal government, which has resisted assuming the<br />

financial burden and future fiscal risk of a federally financed and administered<br />

pharmaceutical coverage programme (Marchildon, 2007).<br />

With the exception of Quebec, governments agreed to allow CADTH to<br />

establish a pan-Canadian process to review the clinical and cost-effectiveness<br />

of new prescription drugs the CDR, which began in 2003. However, the CDR<br />

makes only recommendations, and provincial governments ultimately decide<br />

whether or not to consider CDR analyses in determining whether or not to<br />

include specific pharmaceuticals in their respective <strong>for</strong>mularies. In 2004, as<br />

part of the 10-Year Plan to Strengthen <strong>Health</strong> Care signed by first ministers,<br />

all P/T governments, except <strong>for</strong> Quebec, established a task <strong>for</strong>ce of ministers<br />

of health to develop and implement a “National Pharmaceuticals Strategy” that<br />

encompassed the following nine action items (CICS, 2004):<br />

• in response to ongoing concerns about the financial insecurity caused<br />

by poor and inconsistent coverage of expensive drugs (Phillips, 2009), to<br />

develop, assess and cost the options <strong>for</strong> catastrophic coverage;<br />

• establish a common national drug <strong>for</strong>mulary <strong>for</strong> participating jurisdictions<br />

based on safety and cost-effectiveness;<br />

• accelerate access to breakthrough drugs <strong>for</strong> unmet health needs through<br />

improvement to the federal drug approval process;<br />

• strengthen evaluation of drug safety and effectiveness;<br />

• pursue purchasing strategies to obtain best prices <strong>for</strong> Canadians <strong>for</strong> drugs<br />

and vaccines;<br />

• enhance action to influence the prescribing behaviour of health care<br />

professionals so that drugs are used only when needed and the right drug<br />

is used <strong>for</strong> the right problem;<br />

• broaden the practice of e-prescribing through accelerated development<br />

and deployment of EHRs;<br />

• accelerate access to non-patented drugs and achieve international parity<br />

on prices of generic drugs; and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!