Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe
Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe
Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Health</strong> systems in transition <strong>Canada</strong> 87<br />
indicators measuring ICT access, use and skills, the ICT Development Index,<br />
or IDI as it is known, was developed by the United Nations’ International<br />
Telecommunication Union. In 2010, <strong>Canada</strong> was ranked in 26th position on<br />
this index, considerably lower than Australia, France, Sweden, the United<br />
Kingdom and the United States. Moreover, it is the only country in this group<br />
to experience a decline in its IDI ranking between 2008 and 2010 (see Table 4.5).<br />
It is also worth noting that there was a larger rural–urban gap in terms of<br />
individual use of the Internet in <strong>Canada</strong> than in Australia or the United States<br />
(ITU, 2011).<br />
Table 4.5<br />
ICT Development Index (IDI) based on 11 indicators, rank and level, in <strong>Canada</strong> and<br />
selected countries, 2008 and 2010<br />
IDI level in 2008 IDI rank in 2008 IDI level in 2010 IDI rank in 2010<br />
Australia 6.78 14 7.36 14<br />
<strong>Canada</strong> 6.42 20 6.69 26<br />
France 6.55 18 7.09 18<br />
Sweden 7.53 2 8.23 2<br />
United Kingdom 7.03 10 7.60 10<br />
United States 6.55 17 7.09 17<br />
Source: ITU (2011).<br />
<strong>Canada</strong>’s per<strong>for</strong>mance in the use of ICT <strong>for</strong> health delivery is also poor<br />
relative to a number of other developed countries. In a 2009 survey of<br />
high-income countries that included Australia, France, Sweden, the United<br />
Kingdom and the United States, the Commonwealth Fund found that Canadian<br />
family doctors scored the lowest in terms of using EHRs and had the lowest<br />
electronic in<strong>for</strong>mation functionality based on 14 categories among family<br />
doctors in the 11-country comparison (Schoen, et al., 2009). These results, some<br />
of which are summarized in Table 4.6, are consistent with a different survey of<br />
primary care physicians that included Germany, New Zealand, the Netherlands,<br />
<strong>Canada</strong>, Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. In that study,<br />
Canadian physicians were again at the bottom of the league, with only 16%<br />
using some <strong>for</strong>m of EHRs (Jha et al., 2008). However, based on the 2010 results<br />
of a national physician survey showing that 34% of Canadian physicians use<br />
a combination of paper and electronic records (and 16% use only electronic<br />
records), it appears that this take-up rate is improving (CIHI, 2011f).