25.03.2013 Views

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

Canada - World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Health</strong> systems in transition <strong>Canada</strong> 87<br />

indicators measuring ICT access, use and skills, the ICT Development Index,<br />

or IDI as it is known, was developed by the United Nations’ International<br />

Telecommunication Union. In 2010, <strong>Canada</strong> was ranked in 26th position on<br />

this index, considerably lower than Australia, France, Sweden, the United<br />

Kingdom and the United States. Moreover, it is the only country in this group<br />

to experience a decline in its IDI ranking between 2008 and 2010 (see Table 4.5).<br />

It is also worth noting that there was a larger rural–urban gap in terms of<br />

individual use of the Internet in <strong>Canada</strong> than in Australia or the United States<br />

(ITU, 2011).<br />

Table 4.5<br />

ICT Development Index (IDI) based on 11 indicators, rank and level, in <strong>Canada</strong> and<br />

selected countries, 2008 and 2010<br />

IDI level in 2008 IDI rank in 2008 IDI level in 2010 IDI rank in 2010<br />

Australia 6.78 14 7.36 14<br />

<strong>Canada</strong> 6.42 20 6.69 26<br />

France 6.55 18 7.09 18<br />

Sweden 7.53 2 8.23 2<br />

United Kingdom 7.03 10 7.60 10<br />

United States 6.55 17 7.09 17<br />

Source: ITU (2011).<br />

<strong>Canada</strong>’s per<strong>for</strong>mance in the use of ICT <strong>for</strong> health delivery is also poor<br />

relative to a number of other developed countries. In a 2009 survey of<br />

high-income countries that included Australia, France, Sweden, the United<br />

Kingdom and the United States, the Commonwealth Fund found that Canadian<br />

family doctors scored the lowest in terms of using EHRs and had the lowest<br />

electronic in<strong>for</strong>mation functionality based on 14 categories among family<br />

doctors in the 11-country comparison (Schoen, et al., 2009). These results, some<br />

of which are summarized in Table 4.6, are consistent with a different survey of<br />

primary care physicians that included Germany, New Zealand, the Netherlands,<br />

<strong>Canada</strong>, Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. In that study,<br />

Canadian physicians were again at the bottom of the league, with only 16%<br />

using some <strong>for</strong>m of EHRs (Jha et al., 2008). However, based on the 2010 results<br />

of a national physician survey showing that 34% of Canadian physicians use<br />

a combination of paper and electronic records (and 16% use only electronic<br />

records), it appears that this take-up rate is improving (CIHI, 2011f).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!