25.03.2013 Views

Kshipra Sub Basin - Asian Development Bank

Kshipra Sub Basin - Asian Development Bank

Kshipra Sub Basin - Asian Development Bank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Support to the National Water Mission NAPCC<br />

Appendix 3 <strong>Kshipra</strong> <strong>Sub</strong> <strong>Basin</strong><br />

Figure 33: Structure of Users and Providers<br />

STAKEHOLDER<br />

WATER USERS WATER PROVIDER<br />

Water for final use:<br />

Household demand for drinking purpose<br />

Water for intermediate use/input in<br />

production process:<br />

Household demand for cooking, hygine and<br />

sanitation, bathing, gardening etc.<br />

Agricultural water demand for irrigation<br />

Industrial water demand for process<br />

37<br />

Water suppliers/managers<br />

Formal:<br />

Government managed water supply<br />

department for distribution of canal water for<br />

irrigation and drinking water<br />

Water users association<br />

Informal: Farmers with pump to lift ground<br />

water and sells at a cost either monetized<br />

(cash) or non monetized (in kind)<br />

B. Stakeholder Perceptions to Surface Groundwater and Environment<br />

60. In the <strong>Kshipra</strong> river sub-basin major water user is agriculture sector with changing and ever<br />

increasing demand. Residential sector as water user is important here with declining water table in<br />

and around urban areas of Indore and Ujjain. So, we have focused on farmers, rural households of<br />

various income strata (defined by landholding size) and water managers from irrigation, horticulture<br />

and public health and hygiene departments. Source of information is primary first hand data collected<br />

through rapid rural appraisal through face to face participatory focused group discussions and<br />

community consultations, household surveys and some secondary sources obtained from local<br />

scientists and government handouts. Goal is to identify key issues regarding surface water,<br />

groundwater, water related sectors and the environment to help in preparation of strategic framework<br />

planning. Also, to examine intervention requirements, scope, and strategies to improve the efficiency<br />

of water systems and study how climate change dimensions may effectively be incorporated in IWRM<br />

climate change adaptation roadmaps.<br />

61. The specific goal of PRA and household survey has been to understand community<br />

perception at various levels and to get first hand :<br />

o stakeholder assessment of current issues related to surface and ground water<br />

o the problems and causes of issues<br />

o perception of change in climate induced parameters and impact on water resource<br />

o to test the response to potential initiatives to address water issues<br />

o identify possible initiatives that could be further investigated<br />

1. Adopted Methodology for the PRA<br />

62. The PRA is designed to support the stakeholders through the process of analysis of the<br />

problems and help them identify appropriate response to the difficulties and opportunities. We have<br />

used preset questionnaire as checklist to get structured response. Qualitative response during<br />

focused group discussions has also been recorded, compiled, assessed and presented in the report.<br />

We have followed the conceptual framework of (livelihood, Institutions, Food security and<br />

Empowerment) LIFE approach 7 and Nine Square Mandal in preparation of questionnaire in<br />

cooperation with other team members involved in TA. In the sub basin three locations have been<br />

identified through prior visits, consultative processes with stakeholders. Locations selected are<br />

characterized by primarily diversity in conjunctive water use practices and related challenges. ADB-<br />

PRA team held stakeholder meetings 8 at the villages with stakeholders assembled in focused group<br />

discussion (FGD) in each of the three locations. However, primary data has been collected not only<br />

from FGD but also through household survey (39 households covered) and case analysis (three) – for<br />

7 Ghosh and Roy (2006)<br />

8 PRA meeting participant lists are given in annexure II

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!